Association of Free-to-Total PSA Ratio and 18F-DCFPyL Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Findings in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Single-Center Study

被引:0
作者
Bernardino, Rui M. [1 ,2 ]
Lajkosz, Katherine [3 ]
Yin, Leyi B. [4 ]
Sayyid, Rashid K. [1 ]
Wettstein, Marian [1 ]
Randhawa, Harkanwal [1 ]
Cockburn, Jessica G. [1 ]
Ahmed, Sayeed [1 ]
Thomassian, Rosita [1 ]
Diamandis, Eleftherios [5 ]
Metser, Ur [6 ]
Berlin, Alejandro [7 ,8 ]
Fleshner, Neil E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Urol, Dept Surg Oncol, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Nova Med Sch, Computat & Expt Biol Grp, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Biostat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Hlth Network, Joint Dept Med Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; positron emission tomography; metastases; lymph nodes; CANCER; OUTCOMES; METASTASES; MEN;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.124.267877
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In Canada and across the globe, access to PSMA PET/CT is limited and expensive. For patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after treatment for prostate cancer, novel strategies are needed to better stratify patients who may or may not benefit from a PSMA PET scan. The role of the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio (FPSAR) in posttreatment prostate cancer, specifically in the PSMA PET/CT era, remains unknown. Our aim in this study was to determine the association of FPSAR in patients referred for F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT in the BCR setting and assess the correlation between FPSAR and F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT positivity (local recurrence or distant metastases). Methods: This prospective study included 137 patients who were referred for F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT and had BCR with a total PSA of less than 1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy (RP) (including adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy). Blood samples were collected on the day of F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT. FPSAR was categorized as less than 0.10 or as 0.10 or more. A positive F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scan was defined by a PROMISE classification lesion score of 2 or 3, irrespective of the site of increased tracer uptake (e.g., prostate, pelvic nodes, bone, or viscera). Results: Overall, 137 blood samples of patients with BCR after RP were analyzed to calculate FPSAR. The median age at F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT was 68.6 y (interquartile range, 63.0-72.4 y), and the median PSA at F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT was 0.3 ng/mL (interquartile range, 0.3-0.6 ng/mL). Eighty-six patients (62.8%) had an FPSAR of less than 0.10, whereas 51 patients (37.2%) had an FPSAR of 0.10 or more. An FPSAR of 0.10 or more was identified as an independent predictor of a positive F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scan, with an odds ratio of 6.99 (95% CI, 2.96-16.51; P < 0.001). Conclusion: An FPSAR of 0.10 or more after RP independently correlated with increased odds of a positive F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT scan among BCR post-RP patients. These findings may offer an inexpensive method by which to triage access to F-18-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT in jurisdictions where availability is not replete.
引用
收藏
页码:1731 / 1739
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Stenman UH, Leinonen J, Alfthan H, Rannikko S, Tuhkanen K, Alfthan O., A complex between prostate-specific antigen and a1-antichymotrypsin is the major form of prostate-specific antigen in serum of patients with prostatic cancer: assay of the complex improves clinical sensitivity for cancer, Cancer Res, 51, pp. 222-226, (1991)
  • [2] Magklara A, Scorilas A, Catalona WJ, Diamandis EP., The combination of human glandular kallikrein and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) enhances discrimination between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with moderately increased total PSA, Clin Chem, 45, pp. 1960-1966, (1999)
  • [3] Luderer AA, Chen YT, Soriano TF, Et al., Measurement of the proportion of free to total prostate-specific antigen improves diagnostic performance of prostate-specific antigen in the diagnostic gray zone of total prostate-specific antigen, Urology, 46, pp. 187-194, (1995)
  • [4] Goldberg H, Glicksman R, Woon D, Et al., Can post-treatment free PSA ratio be used to predict adverse outcomes in recurrent prostate cancer?, BJU Int, 127, pp. 654-664, (2021)
  • [5] Woon DTS, Herrera-Caceres JO, Goldberg H, Et al., A high percent free prostate specific antigen in the setting of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is associated with poorer outcomes: a validation study using prospectively collected biobank specimens, J Urol, 204, pp. 289-295, (2020)
  • [6] Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Et al., Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study, Lancet, 395, pp. 1208-1216, (2020)
  • [7] Beheshti M, Manafi-Farid R, Geinitz H, Et al., Multiphasic <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the detection of early recurrence in prostate cancer patients with a PSA level of less than 1 ng/mL: a prospective study of 135 patients, J Nucl Med, 61, pp. 1484-1490, (2020)
  • [8] Goldberg H, Hoffman A, Woon TS, Et al., Can free PSA be used as a biomarker in biochemical recurrence after surgery to predict castrate resistant prostate cancer? [abstract], J Clin Oncol, 36, (2018)
  • [9] Goldberg H, Glicksman R, Fleshner NE, Et al., Free PSA ratio as a predictor of adverse outcomes after curative-intent external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a novel application of an “old” biomarker [abstract], Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 102, (2018)
  • [10] Eiber M, Herrmann K, Calais J, Et al., Prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM classification for the interpretation of PSMA-ligand PET/CT, J Nucl Med, 59, pp. 469-478, (2018)