Religion, Perceptions of Scientists' Moral Culture, and Support for Science in the United States

被引:0
作者
O'Brien, Timothy L. [1 ]
Noy, Shiri [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI USA
[2] Denison Univ, Denison, OH USA
关键词
science; religion; morality; surveys; structural equation models; PUBLIC TRUST; ACCEPTANCE; CATEGORIES; POLITICS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1177/00031224251316904
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
How do perceptions of scientists' moral values relate to support for science in society? Recent advances in the sociology of science and religion suggest that people associate scientists with moral values in addition to factual knowledge, and that concerns about scientists' morality are why members of some religious groups are more critical of science than non-religious people. We test this theory using data from a probability sample of U.S. adults that includes new measures of beliefs about scientists' moral values, such as their compassion, fairness, and generosity (n = 1,513). Results from structural equation models indicate that active members of all religious groups are, to varying degrees, more skeptical than atheists and agnostics of scientists' moral character. A decomposition of direct and indirect effects indicates that beliefs about scientists' moral values play an intermediary role in the relationship between religion and support for science, and that support for science among the religious is partially suppressed by their concerns about scientists' morality. This article offers the first direct evidence of the moral culture the U.S. public associates with scientists. We suggest that religious differences in support for organized science reflect religious differences in beliefs about scientists' moral values.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 290
页数:34
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Abend Gabriel., 2011, European Journal of Sociology/Archives Europennes de Sociologie, V52
[2]   Trust is the common denominator for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: A literature review [J].
Adhikari, Bipin ;
Cheah, Phaik Yeong ;
von Seidlein, Lorenz .
VACCINE: X, 2022, 12
[3]  
Alumkal Antony., 2019, Paranoid Science: The Christian Rights War on Reality
[4]  
Amitai Etzioni, 1974, Daedalus, V103, P205
[5]   Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (03) :397-438
[6]   Crusading for Moral Authority: Christian Nationalism and Opposition to Science [J].
Baker, Joseph O. ;
Perry, Samuel L. ;
Whitehead, Andrew L. .
SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 2020, 35 (03) :587-607
[7]   Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study [J].
Bernal, Jamie Lopez ;
Andrews, Nick ;
Gower, Charlotte ;
Robertson, Chris ;
Stowe, Julia ;
Tessier, Elise ;
Simmons, Ruth ;
Cottrell, Simon ;
Roberts, Richard ;
O'Doherty, Mark ;
Brown, Kevin ;
Cameron, Claire ;
Stockton, Diane ;
McMenamin, Jim ;
Ramsay, Mary .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 373
[8]   The Populist Style in American Politics: Presidential Campaign Discourse, 1952-1996 [J].
Bonikowski, Bart ;
Gidron, Noam .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2016, 94 (04) :1593-1621
[9]  
Boyle J, 2004, THEOR MED BIOETH, V25, P51
[10]  
Burge Ryan P., 2022, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, V61