Simplifying the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid for enhanced accessibility

被引:0
作者
Kim, Ji-yoon [1 ]
Choi, Jae-Hyeon [1 ]
Ryu, Hyunyoung [1 ]
Kang, Hye-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Coll Ecol & Environm Sci, Dept Horse Compan & Wild Anim, Sangju, South Korea
关键词
animal welfare; animal welfare assessment; Animal Welfare Assessment Grid; Five Domains Model; zoo animal welfare; observation-based welfare assessment; simplified welfare assessment; non-expert welfare evaluation; VALIDITY; RATINGS; ZOOS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2024.1459560
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Ensuring animal welfare is essential for both the well-being of zoo animals and the effective management of zoological facilities. This study introduces the Simplified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (S-AWAG), a streamlined adaptation of the original AWAG framework that integrates the Five Domains Model with an observation-based approach. Designed for non-expert users, S-AWAG focuses on easily observable welfare indicators-such as health and environmental conditions-making it particularly suitable for small, private zoos, including petting zoos, roadside zoos, indoor zoos, and animal caf & eacute;s. We conducted welfare assessments on 304 animals from 11 species across nine zoos in South Korea. The results revealed significant differences in welfare standards between accredited and non-accredited zoos, with accredited facilities consistently demonstrating better welfare conditions (p < 0.05). The tool exhibited high inter-rater reliability (IRR = 0.839), confirming its consistency across assessors with varying levels of expertise and ensuring reliable and accurate results. Pearson correlation analysis identified strong positive associations between health and environmental factors, reinforcing the comprehensive nature of the tool's evaluation approach. With its user-friendly, efficient, and adaptable design, S-AWAG has the potential to improve animal welfare standards not only in South Korea but also globally, particularly in smaller, resource-constrained facilities.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Normal behaviour as a basis for animal welfare assessment
    Wechsler, B.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [22] Beak trimming in poultry - an animal welfare assessment
    Petermann, S
    Fiedler, HH
    TIERARZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 1999, 54 (01): : 8 - +
  • [23] Incorporating the Philosophy of Technology into Animal Welfare Assessment
    Courtney Lynd Daigle
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2014, 27 : 633 - 647
  • [24] Animal welfare assessment in farm assurance schemes
    Main, DCJ
    Webster, F
    Green, LE
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 : 108 - 113
  • [25] Test-Retest Reliability of the 'Welfare Quality® Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sows and Piglets'. Part 1. Assessment of the Welfare Principle of 'Appropriate Behavior'
    Friedrich, Lena
    Krieter, Joachim
    Kemper, Nicole
    Czycholl, Irena
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [26] Editorial: Animal Welfare Assessment: Edition 2
    Narayan, Edward
    McElligott, Alan G.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [27] ON-FARM ANIMAL WELFARE ASSESSMENT AND WELFARE IMPROVEMENT IN DAIRY CATTLE
    Winckler, Christoph
    AGROLIFE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 2014, 3 (01): : 163 - 168
  • [28] Interobserver Reliability of the Animal Welfare Indicators Welfare Assessment Protocol for Horses
    Czycholl, Irena
    Klingbeil, Philipp
    Krieter, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2019, 75 : 112 - 121
  • [29] Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare
    Botreau, R.
    Veissier, I.
    Butterworth, A.
    Bracke, M. B. M.
    Keeling, L. J.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 225 - 228
  • [30] Welfare Assessment Tools in Zoos: From Theory to Practice
    Jones, Narelle
    Sherwen, Sally L.
    Robbins, Rachel
    McLelland, David J.
    Whittaker, Alexandra L.
    VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (04)