Simplifying the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid for enhanced accessibility

被引:0
作者
Kim, Ji-yoon [1 ]
Choi, Jae-Hyeon [1 ]
Ryu, Hyunyoung [1 ]
Kang, Hye-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Coll Ecol & Environm Sci, Dept Horse Compan & Wild Anim, Sangju, South Korea
关键词
animal welfare; animal welfare assessment; Animal Welfare Assessment Grid; Five Domains Model; zoo animal welfare; observation-based welfare assessment; simplified welfare assessment; non-expert welfare evaluation; VALIDITY; RATINGS; ZOOS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2024.1459560
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Ensuring animal welfare is essential for both the well-being of zoo animals and the effective management of zoological facilities. This study introduces the Simplified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (S-AWAG), a streamlined adaptation of the original AWAG framework that integrates the Five Domains Model with an observation-based approach. Designed for non-expert users, S-AWAG focuses on easily observable welfare indicators-such as health and environmental conditions-making it particularly suitable for small, private zoos, including petting zoos, roadside zoos, indoor zoos, and animal caf & eacute;s. We conducted welfare assessments on 304 animals from 11 species across nine zoos in South Korea. The results revealed significant differences in welfare standards between accredited and non-accredited zoos, with accredited facilities consistently demonstrating better welfare conditions (p < 0.05). The tool exhibited high inter-rater reliability (IRR = 0.839), confirming its consistency across assessors with varying levels of expertise and ensuring reliable and accurate results. Pearson correlation analysis identified strong positive associations between health and environmental factors, reinforcing the comprehensive nature of the tool's evaluation approach. With its user-friendly, efficient, and adaptable design, S-AWAG has the potential to improve animal welfare standards not only in South Korea but also globally, particularly in smaller, resource-constrained facilities.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Assessment Methods and Indicators of Animal Welfare
    Sejian, Veerasamy
    Lakritz, Jeffrey
    Ezeji, Thaddeus
    Lal, Rattan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2011, 6 (04): : 301 - 315
  • [12] Assessment of animal welfare in husbandry systems
    Bracke, MBM
    Metz, JHM
    ten Cate, AJU
    LIVESTOCK FARMING SYSTEMS, 1997, 89 : 231 - 237
  • [13] Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare
    Dawkins, MS
    ZOOLOGY, 2003, 106 (04) : 383 - 387
  • [14] Overall assessment of animal welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality®
    Botreau, R.
    Veissier, I.
    Perny, P.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2009, 18 (04) : 363 - 370
  • [15] The Extended Welfare Assessment Grid: A Matrix for the Assessment of Welfare and Cumulative Suffering in Experimental Animals
    Honess, Paul
    Wolfensohn, Sarah
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2010, 38 (03): : 205 - 212
  • [16] Risk assessment in animal welfare - Especially referring to animal transport
    Marahrens, M.
    Kleinschmidt, N.
    Di Nardo, A.
    Velarde, A.
    Fuentes, C.
    Truar, A.
    Otero, J. L.
    Di Fede, E.
    Dalla Villa, P.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2011, 102 (02) : 157 - 163
  • [17] Incorporating the Philosophy of Technology into Animal Welfare Assessment
    Daigle, Courtney Lynd
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2014, 27 (04) : 633 - 647
  • [18] Editorial: Animal welfare assessment, Volume III
    Narayan, Edward
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [19] Editorial: Animal Welfare Assessment: Edition 1
    Narayan, Edward
    McElligott, Alan
    Tilbrook, Alan
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [20] Risk assessment principles in evaluation of animal welfare
    Paton, M. W.
    Martin, P. A. J.
    Fisher, A. D.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2013, 22 (02) : 277 - 285