Simplifying the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid for enhanced accessibility

被引:0
作者
Kim, Ji-yoon [1 ]
Choi, Jae-Hyeon [1 ]
Ryu, Hyunyoung [1 ]
Kang, Hye-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Coll Ecol & Environm Sci, Dept Horse Compan & Wild Anim, Sangju, South Korea
关键词
animal welfare; animal welfare assessment; Animal Welfare Assessment Grid; Five Domains Model; zoo animal welfare; observation-based welfare assessment; simplified welfare assessment; non-expert welfare evaluation; VALIDITY; RATINGS; ZOOS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2024.1459560
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Ensuring animal welfare is essential for both the well-being of zoo animals and the effective management of zoological facilities. This study introduces the Simplified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (S-AWAG), a streamlined adaptation of the original AWAG framework that integrates the Five Domains Model with an observation-based approach. Designed for non-expert users, S-AWAG focuses on easily observable welfare indicators-such as health and environmental conditions-making it particularly suitable for small, private zoos, including petting zoos, roadside zoos, indoor zoos, and animal caf & eacute;s. We conducted welfare assessments on 304 animals from 11 species across nine zoos in South Korea. The results revealed significant differences in welfare standards between accredited and non-accredited zoos, with accredited facilities consistently demonstrating better welfare conditions (p < 0.05). The tool exhibited high inter-rater reliability (IRR = 0.839), confirming its consistency across assessors with varying levels of expertise and ensuring reliable and accurate results. Pearson correlation analysis identified strong positive associations between health and environmental factors, reinforcing the comprehensive nature of the tool's evaluation approach. With its user-friendly, efficient, and adaptable design, S-AWAG has the potential to improve animal welfare standards not only in South Korea but also globally, particularly in smaller, resource-constrained facilities.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Animal Welfare Assessment in 16 Zoos in South Korea Using the Modified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid
    Ma, Seung-Aee
    Kang, Hye-Jin
    Lee, Kyuyoung
    Kim, Sun-A
    Han, Jin Soo
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [2] Feasibility and validity of the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid to monitor the welfare of zoo-housed gorillas Gorilla gorilla gorilla
    Brouwers, Stijn P.
    Duchateau, Marie Jose H. M.
    JOURNAL OF ZOO AND AQUARIUM RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (04): : 208 - 217
  • [3] Welfare Assessment of Invertebrates: Adapting the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) for Zoo Decapods and Cephalopods
    Narshi, Tanya M.
    Free, Danielle
    Justice, William S. M.
    Smith, Sarah Jayne
    Wolfensohn, Sarah
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (13):
  • [4] Preliminary validation of a novel tool to assess dog welfare: The Animal Welfare Assessment Grid
    Malkani, Rachel
    Paramasivam, Sharmini
    Wolfensohn, Sarah
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [5] Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare
    de Jong, I. C.
    Hindle, V. A.
    Butterworth, A.
    Engel, B.
    Ferrari, P.
    Gunnink, H.
    Moya, T. Perez
    Tuyttens, F. A. M.
    van Reenen, C. G.
    ANIMAL, 2016, 10 (01) : 117 - 127
  • [6] The Animal Welfare Assessment Contest® as a Tool to Promote Animal Welfare Education
    Kuca, Sharon
    McKinney, Lindsey
    Johnson, Cia
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 468 - 468
  • [7] Scientific assessment of animal welfare
    Hemsworth, P. H.
    Mellor, D. J.
    Cronin, G. M.
    Tilbrook, A. J.
    NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2015, 63 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [8] Ackonc-AWA: A multi-species animal welfare assessment protocol for wild animals under human care to overcome the use of generic welfare checklists
    Racciatti, Debora Silvia
    Feld, Alejandra
    Rial, Laura Analia
    Blanco, Carlos
    Tallo-Parra, Oriol
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [9] Assessment of the impact of government animal welfare policy on farm animal welfare in the UK
    Bennett, RM
    Broom, DM
    Henson, SJ
    Blaney, RJP
    Harper, G
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2004, 13 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Extending the 'Five Domains' model for animal welfare assessment to incorporate positive welfare states
    Mellor, D. J.
    Beausoleil, N. J.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2015, 24 (03) : 241 - 253