ALCOHOL USE DISORDER AND DEPRESSION IN PATIENTS AFTER UNDERGOING BARIATRIC SURGERY

BACKGROUND: Research indicates that patients undergoing bariatric surgery face a six to seven times higher risk of developing alcohol use disorder (AUD) compared with the population of obese individuals not undergoing surgical intervention. Studies suggest that problematic alcohol-Racional: O tiatamento de escolha paia pacientes com hipeitens & atilde;o poital consumption encompassing depression escalates gradually after surgery. AIMS: The purpose of esquistossom & oacute;tica com sangiamento de vaiizes & eacute; a desconex & atilde;o & aacute;zigo-poital mais this study was to evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on the incidence of AUD and depression esplenectomia (DAPE) associada & agrave; teiapia endosc & oacute;pica. Poi & eacute;m, estudos mostiam aumento during the postoperative period. METHODS: Prospective study that evaluated 68 patients who do calibie das vaiizes em alguns pacientes duiante o seguimento em longo piazo. Objetivo: underwent either sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The presence of Avaliai o impacto da DAPE e tiatamento endosc & oacute;pico p & oacute;s-opeiat & oacute;iio no compoitamento AUD and depression was assessed both pre-and post-operatively. AUD assessment utilized the AUD identification test-C score, whereas depression assessment employed the Beck Depression Inventory das vaiizes esof & aacute;gicas e iecidiva hemoii & aacute;gica, de pacientes esquistossom & oacute;ticos. M & eacute;todos: (BDI). RESULTS: The average age of the sample was 42.81 +/- 9.28 years, with 85.3% being female. Foiam estudados 36 pacientes com seguimento supeiioi a cinco anos, distiibu & iacute;dos em The mean follow-up was 16.54 +/- 7.41 months. In the preoperative assessment, 92.6% of the sample dois giupos: queda da piess & atilde;o poital abaixo de 30% e acima de 30% compaiados com o fell into the low-risk category for AUD. No significant difference was observed between the RYGB calibie das vaiizes esof & aacute;gicas no p & oacute;s-opeiat & oacute;iio piecoce e taidio al & eacute;m do & iacute;ndice de iecidiva and SG groups. Postoperatively, 89.7% of the sample was classified as low risk for AUD, with no hemoii & aacute;gica. Resultados significant differences compared with the preoperative assessment. Regarding depression, there was no significant difference between pre-and post-operative periods for all patients. However, a esof & aacute;gicas que, duiante o seguimento aumentaiam de calibie e foiam contioladas com notable trend toward a reduction in "severe depression" was observed in the postoperative period for patients undergoing SG (pre: 14.0% vs. post: 7.0%, p=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant o compoitamento do calibie das vaiizes no p & oacute;s-opeiat & oacute;iio piecoce nem taidio nem os difference in the presence of AUD and depression between pre-and post-operative assessments in & iacute;ndices de iecidiva hemoii & aacute;gica. Conclus & atilde;o patients who have undergone bariatric surgery.