Are patient-reported outcomes improved by implant-assisted maxillary prostheses compared to conventional maxillary dentures? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Michaud, Pierre-Luc [1 ]
Talmazov, Georgi [1 ]
Dort, Hillary [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Clin Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Maxillary dentures; Implants; Satisfaction; Quality of life; Patient-based outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; BONE LOSS; TREATMENT SATISFACTION; CHEWING ABILITY; FOLLOW-UP; CHOICE; BAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105490
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Edentulism can be treated with conventional complete dentures or implant-assisted prostheses. While two-implant assisted overdentures are superior to conventional mandibular dentures, the effectiveness of maxillary options remains unclear. This systematic review aims to assess whether conventional or implantassisted maxillary prostheses provide better satisfaction and quality of life for patients with edentulous maxilla. Data and sources: An electronic search was conducted across Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to May 23, 2024, to find studies comparing satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life in patients using conventional maxillary dentures versus implant-assisted maxillary prostheses. Study selection: Out of 1119 retrieved articles, 1085 were deemed irrelevant after screening, and 34 studies were evaluated for inclusion. Only six studies met the criteria, with the main reason for exclusion being the lack of comparison between new implant prostheses and new conventional dentures, as opposed to old unsatisfactory conventional maxillary dentures. Due to limited sample sizes and high heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible. The literature did not show significant differences in quality of life or satisfaction between conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses, except for patients with pre-treatment preference toward implants. Conclusions: There is no evidence supporting the superiority of either conventional or implant-assisted prosthetic options for restoring the edentulous maxilla. Further well-designed clinical studies are needed to compare new conventional and new implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses with different designs. Clinical significance: Conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses appear equally successful in restoring the quality of life and satisfaction of patients with an edentulous maxilla. The cost and morbidity associated with implant-assisted prostheses may be greater. A properly made conventional denture can serve as a diagnostic tool to assist treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EMG correlations of edentulous patients with implant overdentures and fixed dental prostheses compared to conventional complete dentures and dentates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    von der Gracht, Ina
    Derks, Andreas
    Haselhuhn, Klaus
    Wolfart, Stefan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (07) : 765 - 773
  • [42] Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications
    Bandiaky, Octave N.
    Lokossou, Dohoue L.
    Soueidan, Assem
    Le Bars, Pierre
    Gueye, Moctar
    Mbodj, Elhadj B.
    Le Guehennec, Laurent
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 8 (01): : 294 - 312
  • [43] Assessing health outcomes: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology
    Urretavizcaya, Mikel
    Alvarez, Karen
    Olariaga, Olatz
    Tames, Maria Jose
    Asensio, Ainhoa
    Cajaraville, Gerardo
    Riestra, Ana Cristina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2024,
  • [44] Comparison of rapid versus slow maxillary expansion on patient-reported outcome measures in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rutili, Valentina
    Nieri, Michele
    Franceschi, Debora
    Pierleoni, Felicita
    Giuntini, Veronica
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [45] Comparison of rapid versus slow maxillary expansion on patient-reported outcome measures in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valentina Rutili
    Michele Nieri
    Debora Franceschi
    Felicita Pierleoni
    Veronica Giuntini
    Lorenzo Franchi
    Progress in Orthodontics, 23
  • [46] Life after endometrial cancer: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes
    Shisler, Robert
    Sinnott, Jennifer A.
    Wang, Vivian
    Hebert, Courtney
    Salani, Ritu
    Felix, Ashley S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (02) : 403 - 413
  • [47] Assessment of patient-reported outcomes measures in heart failure: a systematic review
    Mendes, Joao Lazaro
    dos Santos, Cristina Mendes
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2024, 29 (04) : 853 - 867
  • [48] Patient-reported outcomes in bariatric surgery: a systematic review of standards of reporting
    Coulman, K. D.
    Abdelrahman, T.
    Owen-Smith, A.
    Andrews, R. C.
    Welbourn, R.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2013, 14 (09) : 707 - 720
  • [49] A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus
    Ogunsanya, M. E.
    Kalb, S. J.
    Kabaria, A.
    Chen, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 176 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [50] Obesity in Pregnancy - Patient-Reported Outcomes in Qualitative Research: A Systematic Review
    Dadouch, Rachel
    Hall, Chelsea
    Du Mont, Janice
    D'Souza, Rohan
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2020, 42 (08) : 1001 - 1011