Are patient-reported outcomes improved by implant-assisted maxillary prostheses compared to conventional maxillary dentures? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Michaud, Pierre-Luc [1 ]
Talmazov, Georgi [1 ]
Dort, Hillary [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Clin Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Maxillary dentures; Implants; Satisfaction; Quality of life; Patient-based outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; BONE LOSS; TREATMENT SATISFACTION; CHEWING ABILITY; FOLLOW-UP; CHOICE; BAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105490
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Edentulism can be treated with conventional complete dentures or implant-assisted prostheses. While two-implant assisted overdentures are superior to conventional mandibular dentures, the effectiveness of maxillary options remains unclear. This systematic review aims to assess whether conventional or implantassisted maxillary prostheses provide better satisfaction and quality of life for patients with edentulous maxilla. Data and sources: An electronic search was conducted across Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to May 23, 2024, to find studies comparing satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life in patients using conventional maxillary dentures versus implant-assisted maxillary prostheses. Study selection: Out of 1119 retrieved articles, 1085 were deemed irrelevant after screening, and 34 studies were evaluated for inclusion. Only six studies met the criteria, with the main reason for exclusion being the lack of comparison between new implant prostheses and new conventional dentures, as opposed to old unsatisfactory conventional maxillary dentures. Due to limited sample sizes and high heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible. The literature did not show significant differences in quality of life or satisfaction between conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses, except for patients with pre-treatment preference toward implants. Conclusions: There is no evidence supporting the superiority of either conventional or implant-assisted prosthetic options for restoring the edentulous maxilla. Further well-designed clinical studies are needed to compare new conventional and new implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses with different designs. Clinical significance: Conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses appear equally successful in restoring the quality of life and satisfaction of patients with an edentulous maxilla. The cost and morbidity associated with implant-assisted prostheses may be greater. A properly made conventional denture can serve as a diagnostic tool to assist treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH CANCER SCREENING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Kim, A.
    Chung, K. C.
    Keir, C.
    Patrick, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S62 - S62
  • [22] Mode of administration of Patient-Reported outcomes (PROs): a systematic review
    Rutherford, Claudia
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca L.
    Rice, Holly
    King, Madeleine T.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 137 - 137
  • [23] Systematic Review of Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Interventional Radiology
    Datta, Sanjit
    Cramer, Peyton
    Sung, Jeffrey
    Wright, Drew
    Charalel, Resmi
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 20 (08) : 752 - 757
  • [24] Dentoalveolar, periodontal and skeletal effects of maxillary expansion techniques assisted by temporary anchorage devices compared with conventional protocols in growing patients with transverse maxillary deficiency: A systematic review and metaanalysis
    Barreneche-Calle, Laura Marcela
    Marin-Arboleda, Rober David
    Gomez-Gomez, Sandra Liliana
    Agudelo-Suarez, Andres A.
    Ramirez-Ossa, Diana Milena
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 22 (03)
  • [25] Patient-reported outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review
    King, Madeleine T.
    Winters, Zoe E.
    Olivotto, Ivo A.
    Spillane, Andrew J.
    Chua, Boon H.
    Saunders, Christobel
    Westenberg, A. Helen
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Burnett, Petrina
    Butow, Phyllis
    Rutherford, Claudia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 71 : 95 - 108
  • [26] Patient-reported outcomes in Gaucher’s disease: a systematic review
    Junchao Feng
    Zhongchun Gao
    Zhao Shi
    Yue Wang
    Shunping Li
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 18
  • [27] Patient-reported outcomes in Hodgkin lymphoma trials: a systematic review
    Oliva, Esther Natalie
    Ionova, Tatyana
    Laane, Edward
    Csenar, Mario
    Schroer, Julia
    Behringer, Karolin
    Monsef, Ina
    Oeser, Annika
    Skoetz, Nicole
    Salek, Sam
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [28] Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review
    Vandenbroeck, S.
    De Geest, S.
    Zeyen, T.
    Stalmans, I.
    Dobbels, F.
    EYE, 2011, 25 (05) : 555 - 577
  • [29] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES PROJECT IN CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Al-Ghabari, M.
    Michl, K.
    Ahmed
    Bele, S.
    Santana, M.
    Gregory, A.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (SUPPL 1) : S45 - S46
  • [30] Patient-reported outcomes in Gaucher's disease: a systematic review
    Feng, Junchao
    Gao, Zhongchun
    Shi, Zhao
    Wang, Yue
    Li, Shunping
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2023, 18 (01)