Are patient-reported outcomes improved by implant-assisted maxillary prostheses compared to conventional maxillary dentures? A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Michaud, Pierre-Luc [1 ]
Talmazov, Georgi [1 ]
Dort, Hillary [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Clin Sci, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Maxillary dentures; Implants; Satisfaction; Quality of life; Patient-based outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SUPPORTED OVERDENTURES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; BONE LOSS; TREATMENT SATISFACTION; CHEWING ABILITY; FOLLOW-UP; CHOICE; BAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105490
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Edentulism can be treated with conventional complete dentures or implant-assisted prostheses. While two-implant assisted overdentures are superior to conventional mandibular dentures, the effectiveness of maxillary options remains unclear. This systematic review aims to assess whether conventional or implantassisted maxillary prostheses provide better satisfaction and quality of life for patients with edentulous maxilla. Data and sources: An electronic search was conducted across Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to May 23, 2024, to find studies comparing satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life in patients using conventional maxillary dentures versus implant-assisted maxillary prostheses. Study selection: Out of 1119 retrieved articles, 1085 were deemed irrelevant after screening, and 34 studies were evaluated for inclusion. Only six studies met the criteria, with the main reason for exclusion being the lack of comparison between new implant prostheses and new conventional dentures, as opposed to old unsatisfactory conventional maxillary dentures. Due to limited sample sizes and high heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible. The literature did not show significant differences in quality of life or satisfaction between conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses, except for patients with pre-treatment preference toward implants. Conclusions: There is no evidence supporting the superiority of either conventional or implant-assisted prosthetic options for restoring the edentulous maxilla. Further well-designed clinical studies are needed to compare new conventional and new implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses with different designs. Clinical significance: Conventional and implant-assisted complete maxillary prostheses appear equally successful in restoring the quality of life and satisfaction of patients with an edentulous maxilla. The cost and morbidity associated with implant-assisted prostheses may be greater. A properly made conventional denture can serve as a diagnostic tool to assist treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported outcomes of maxillary implant-supported overdentures compared with conventional dentures
    Zembic, Anja
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (04) : 441 - 450
  • [2] Implant-Assisted Dental Rehabilitation of a Patient With Maxillary Rhabdomyosarcoma
    Bektas-Kayhan, Kivanc
    Karagoz, Gizem
    Bayrak, Ozlem
    Kurklu, Esma
    Ozbek, Ceren Damla
    Ak, Gulsum
    Unur, Meral
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 23 (05) : E384 - E386
  • [3] Patient-reported outcomes in patients with severe maxillary bone atrophy restored with zygomatic implant-supported complete dental prostheses: a systematic review
    Saez-Alcaide, Luis Miguel
    Cortes-Breton-Brinkmann, Jorge
    Sanchez-Labrador, Luis
    Perez-Gonzalez, Fabian
    Forteza-Lopez, Alba
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Lopez-Quiles, Juan
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 80 (05) : 363 - 373
  • [4] Patient-reported outcomes of implant-assisted removable partial dentures with magnetic attachments using short implants: A prospective study
    Negoro, Masatoshi
    Kanazawa, Manabu
    Sato, Daisuke
    Shimada, Ryo
    Miyayasu, Anna
    Asami, Mari
    Katheng, Awutsadaporn
    Kusumoto, Yuriko
    Abe, Yuka
    Baba, Kazuyoshi
    Minakuchi, Shunsuke
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 65 (04) : 554 - 558
  • [5] Treatment Outcomes of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses in Patients with Maxillary Defects: A Systematic Review
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Helm, Alexandra
    Cobo-Vazquez, Carlos
    Lam, Walter Y. H.
    Azevedo, Luis
    Pow, Edmond H. N.
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (04) : 429 - 440
  • [6] Maxillary changes under conventional dentures opposing implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Gupta, S
    Lechner, SK
    Duckmanton, NA
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 78 (05) : 949 - 949
  • [7] Converting Bilateral Free-End Removable Partial Dentures to Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Dentures Using 6 mm Short Implants: Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Prospective Clinical Study
    Abou-Ayash, Samir
    Rudaz, Anne-Carole
    Janner, Simone
    Kraus, Dominik
    Schimmel, Martin
    Enkling, Norbert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (15)
  • [8] Survival, complications, and patient-reported outcomes of endodontically treated teeth versus dental implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review
    Sinsareekul, Chanakarn
    Saengthong-aram, Phurit
    Limpuangthip, Nareudee
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 133 (03): : 669 - 676
  • [9] Patient-reported outcomes for keloids: a systematic review
    Tan, Andrea
    Glass, Donald A., II
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI DERMATOLOGIA E VENEREOLOGIA, 2019, 154 (02): : 148 - 165
  • [10] Implant-assisted removable partial dentures: Part II. a systematic review of the effects of implant position on the biomechanical behavior
    Kuroshima, Shinichiro
    Sasaki, Muneteru
    Al-Omari, Farah A.
    Uto, Yusuke
    Ohta, Yoshikazu
    Uchida, Yusuke
    Sawase, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (01) : 40 - 49