Postoperative aortic isthmus size after arch reconstruction with patch augmentation predicts arch reintervention

被引:0
作者
Recco, Dominic P. [1 ,3 ]
Kizilski, Shannen B. [1 ,3 ]
Dafflisio, Gianna J. [1 ]
Ghosh, Reena M. [2 ,3 ]
Kittichokechai, Pakaparn [2 ,3 ]
Gauvreau, Kimberlee [2 ,3 ]
Piekarski, Breanna [1 ]
Prakash, Ashwin [2 ,3 ]
Hoganson, David M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, 300 Longwood Ave,2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
关键词
cardiovascular surgery; congenital heart disease; aortic arch; arch reconstruction; patch augmentation; reintervention; SURGICAL REPAIR; RECURRENT COARCTATION; RECOARCTATION; RISK; OBSTRUCTION; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Rates of reintervention (RI) after patch-augmented reconstruction for hypoplastic aortic arch (HAA) remain moderately high. We analyzed mid-term outcomes of aortic arch reconstruction to define modifiable reintervention risk factors. Methods: Excluding Damus-Kaye-Stansel anastomoses and previous arch repair, 338 patients underwent arch reconstruction between 2000 and 2021 at median age of 6 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4-13 days) and a median weight of 3.2 kg (IQR, 2.8-3.7 kg). Surgical technique was patch augmentation with coarctectomy with or without interdigitation in 269 patients (80%), isolated patch aortoplasty in 41 (12%), and other reconstruction in 28 (8%). Risk factors for reintervention were assessed using competing risk models. Results: At median follow-up of 3.9 years (IQR, 1.1-8.0 years), 35 patients (10.4%) required reintervention (endovascular, n = 30; surgical, n = 12; both, n = 7). The 10-year cumulative incidence of death/transplant was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-20%), and that of and reintervention was 13% (95% CI, 8%-20%). On univariate analysis, isolated patch aortoplasty (P = .002), aortic homograft patch material (P = .006), and postoperative aortic size z-score <=-2 for each segment were associated with greater risk of reintervention: ascending aorta (P = .006), proximal (P = .001) and distal (P = .005) transverse arches, and aortic isthmus (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, aortic homograft (hazard ratio [HR], 6.29; 95% CI, 1.94-20.5; P = .002) and postoperative isthmus z-score <=-2 (HR, 10.5; 95% CI, 5.15-21.5; P < .001) remained significant. Patients with a repaired isthmus z-score <=-2 had a 72.8% (95% CI, 44.6-94.4%) cumulative incidence of reintervention at 10 years, versus 6.8% (95% CI, 4.1%-11.4%) in those with a z-score >-2. Conclusions: Aortic undersizing during patch-augmented reconstruction of HAA results in a >10% rate of reintervention at mid-term follow-up. Achieving adequate postoperative arch size is critical for preventing reintervention, with aortic isthmus size of utmost importance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Reintervention for arch obstruction after stage 1 reconstruction does not adversely affect survival or outcome at Fontan completion [J].
Ballweg, Jean A. ;
Dominguez, Troy E. ;
Tabbutt, Sarah ;
Rome, Jonathan J. ;
Gaynor, J. William ;
Nicolson, Susan C. ;
Spray, Thomas L. ;
Ravishankar, Chitra .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 140 (03) :545-549
[32]   External validation of the ARCH score in patients undergoing aortic arch reconstruction under circulatory arrest [J].
Ahmad, Danial ;
Sa, Michel Pompeu ;
Brown, James A. ;
Yousef, Sarah ;
Wang, Yisi ;
Thoma, Floyd ;
Chu, Danny ;
Kaczorowski, David J. ;
West, David M. ;
Bonatti, Johannes ;
Yoon, Pyongsoo D. ;
Ferdinand, Francis D. ;
Serna-Gallegos, Derek ;
Phillippi, Julie ;
Sultan, Ibrahim .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 169 (04) :1182-1190.e4
[33]   Anatomic reconstruction of recurrent aortic arch obstruction in children [J].
Kadner, A ;
Dave, H ;
Bettex, D ;
Valsangiacomo-Buechel, E ;
Turina, MI ;
Prêtre, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 26 (01) :60-64
[34]   Favourable Anatomy After End-to-Side Repair of Interrupted Aortic Arch [J].
Liu, Jessamine Y. J. ;
Jones, Bryn ;
Cheung, Michael M. H. ;
Galati, John C. ;
Koleff, Jane ;
Konstantinov, Igor E. ;
Grigg, Leeanne E. ;
Brizard, Christian P. ;
d'Udekem, Yves .
HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2014, 23 (03) :256-264
[35]   End-to-side anastomosis and autologous pulmonary artery patch for aortic coarctation and hypoplastic aortic arch [J].
Zhao, Zhenjiang ;
Wu, Chun ;
Dai, Jiangtao ;
Lu, Siwei ;
He, Ling ;
Tian, Jie ;
Jin, Xin ;
Pan, Zhengxia .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2025, 17 (02) :959-968
[36]   Geometry of the Aortic Arch After Initial Hybrid or Norwood Palliation [J].
Haller, Christoph ;
Chetan, Devin ;
Saedi, Arezou ;
Parker, Rachel ;
Van Arsdell, Glen S. ;
Caldarone, Christopher A. ;
Honjo, Osami .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (06) :2077-2086
[37]   Open Aortic Arch Reconstruction After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Worth the Effort? [J].
Quintana, Eduard ;
Bajona, Pietro ;
Schaff, Hartzell V. ;
Dearani, Joseph A. ;
Daly, Richard ;
Greason, Kevin ;
Pochettino, Alberto .
SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 28 (01) :26-35
[38]   Preoperative Aortic Arch Size and Late Outcome After Coarctation Repair by Lateral Thoracotomy [J].
Ramachandran, Preeti ;
Khoury, Philip R. ;
Beekman, Robert H. ;
Michelfelder, Erik C. ;
Manning, Peter B. ;
Tweddell, James S. ;
Cnota, James F. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 106 (02) :575-580
[39]   Minimizing Circulatory Arrest by Using Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion for Aortic Arch Reconstruction in Infants Causes Fewer Postoperative Adverse Events [J].
Selder, J. ;
Algra, S. ;
Evens, F. ;
Freund, M. ;
Strengers, J. ;
Schouten, T. ;
Haas, F. .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2010, 58 (01) :17-22
[40]   Aortic arch types and postoperative outcomes after carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients [J].
Casana, Renato ;
Bissacco, Daniele ;
Malloggi, Chiara ;
Tolva, Valerio S. ;
Odero, Andrea, Jr. ;
Domanin, Maurizio ;
Trimarchi, Santi ;
Silani, Vincenzo ;
Parati, Gianfranco .
INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2020, 39 (06) :485-491