Mechanisms of Proactive Adaptation in a Rewarded Response Inhibition Task: Executive, Motor, or Attentional Effects?

被引:0
|
作者
Meyer, Garance M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Riou, Maelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Boulinguez, Philippe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Sescousse, Guillaume [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France
[2] Univ Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
[3] INSERM, Lyon Neurosci Res Ctr, U 1028, F-69000 Lyon, France
[4] CNRS, Lyon Neurosci Res Ctr CRNL, UMR 5292, F-69000 Lyon, France
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Brain Circuit Therapeut, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Response inhibition; Electroencephalography; Reward; Motivation; Proactive control; COGNITIVE CONTROL; IMPULSIVITY; MOTIVATION; COMPONENT; MONETARY; FMRI; GO; COMPULSIVITY; ADJUSTMENTS; DYSFUNCTION;
D O I
10.3758/s13415-025-01269-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A growing number of studies have demonstrated the effects of reward motivation on inhibitory control performance. However, the exact neurocognitive mechanisms supporting these effects are not fully elucidated. In this preregistered study, we test the hypothesis that changes in speed-accuracy trade-off across contexts that alternatively incentivize fast responses versus accurate inhibition rely on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, a mechanism intended to lock movement initiation in anticipation of stimulus presentation. Thirty healthy participants performed a modified Go/NoGo task in which the motivation to prioritize Go vs. NoGo successes was manipulated using monetary rewards of different magnitudes. High-density EEG was recorded throughout the task. Source-space analyses were performed to track brain oscillatory activities consistent with proactive inhibitory control. We observed that participants adapted their behavior to the motivational context but found no evidence that this adaptation relied on a modulation of proactive inhibitory control, hence failing to provide support for our pre-registered hypothesis. Unplanned analyses of brain-behavior relationships suggested an association between faster reaction times and enhanced top-down attention to the stimuli associated with larger rewards, as well as between increased commission error rates and stronger motor activations when Go stimuli were associated with larger rewards. The latter was related to inter-individual differences in trait reward responsiveness. These results highlight the need to carefully parse the different contributing mechanisms when studying the influence of reward motivation on inhibitory performance in impulsivity disorders. Exploratory results suggest alternative mechanisms that may be directly tested in further studies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neuro-Cognitive Effects of Acute Tyrosine Administration on Reactive and Proactive Response Inhibition in Healthy Older Adults
    Bloemendaal, Mirjam
    Frobose, Monja Isabel
    Wegman, Joost
    Zandbelt, Bram Bastiaan
    van de Rest, Ondine
    Cools, Roshan
    Aarts, Esther
    ENEURO, 2018, 5 (02)
  • [42] Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?
    Simi, Nicoletta
    Mackenzie, Ian Grant
    Leuthold, Hartmut
    Janczyk, Markus
    Dudschig, Carolin
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 76 (03): : 649 - 671
  • [43] No training effects of top-down controlled response inhibition by practicing on the stop-signal task
    You, Yihong
    Failla, Alberto
    van der Kamp, John
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2023, 235
  • [44] A double-blind placebo-controlled experimental study of nicotine: II - Effects on response inhibition and executive functioning
    Dawkins, Lynne
    Powell, Jane H.
    West, Robert
    Powell, John
    Pickering, Alan
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 190 (04) : 457 - 467
  • [45] A double-blind placebo-controlled experimental study of nicotine: II—Effects on response inhibition and executive functioning
    Lynne Dawkins
    Jane H. Powell
    Robert West
    John Powell
    Alan Pickering
    Psychopharmacology, 2007, 190 : 457 - 467
  • [46] Examining methodological variation in response inhibition: The effects of outcome measures and task characteristics on age-related differences
    Klenberg, Liisa
    Narhi, Vesa
    Korkman, Marit
    Hokkanen, Laura
    CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 21 (05) : 586 - 602
  • [47] Neural mechanisms of response-preparation and inhibition in bilingual and monolingual children: Lateralized Readiness Potentials (LRPs) during a nonverbal Stroop task
    Nayak, Srishti
    Salem, Hiba Z.
    Tarullo, Amanda R.
    DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 41
  • [48] Slow walking on a treadmill desk does not negatively affect executive abilities: an examination of cognitive control, conflict adaptation, response inhibition, and post-error slowing
    Larson, Michael J.
    LeCheminant, James D.
    Carbine, Kaylie
    Hill, Kyle R.
    Christenson, Edward
    Masterson, Travis
    LeCheminant, Rick
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [49] Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection
    Iani, Cristina
    Rubichi, Sandro
    Gherri, Elena
    Nicoletti, Roberto
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2009, 37 (03) : 358 - 367
  • [50] After-effects of goal shifting and response inhibition: A comparison of the stop-change and dual-task paradigms
    Verbruggen, Frederick
    Logan, Gordon D.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 61 (08): : 1151 - 1159