An evaluation of the recently approved drugs for treating atopic dermatitis in the context of their safety and efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThe present paper aimed to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of crisaborole, delgocitinib, and ruxolitinib in treating mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).MethodsMEDLINE and Google Scholar databases were utilized to search articles published during the years 2015-2024. The review was limited to randomized controlled studies that measured specific outcomes for safety and efficacy aspects, including adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) to evaluate safety and Investigator's static global assessment (ISGA) or improvement of at least 75% of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) to evaluate efficacy.ResultsThe review included 17 articles in the analysis. The safety odds ratios (ORs) among participants using crisaborole, delgocitinib, and ruxolitinib were 1.14, 95% CI [0.97-1.36], 1.18, 95% CI [0.84-1.67], and 0.72, 95% CI [0.55-0.94], respectively, when compared to control groups. The three studied topical AD treatments were found to be significantly more effective compared to control groups (crisaborole, OR = 1.78, 95% CI [1.51-2.10], delgocitinib, OR = 6.34, 95% CI [3.57-11.27], and ruxolitinib, OR = 7.30, 95% CI [5.10-10.44]).ConclusionDelgocitinib and ruxolitinib demonstrated favorable safety and effectiveness profiles across various age cohorts, whereas crisaborole raised concerns over its safety and efficacy, particularly in children.