Impact pathways: navigating risks in the pharmaceutical supply chain - a multi-actor perspective

被引:1
作者
Ciceri, Claudia [1 ]
Borsani, Camilla [1 ]
Guida, Michela [1 ]
Farinelli, Marco [1 ]
Caniato, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Sch Management, Milan, Italy
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; Supply chain risk management; Pharmaceutical supply chain; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/IJOPM-06-2024-0458
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aims to comprehensively map and prioritize risks in the pharmaceutical supply chain, focusing on European and North American countries through a multi-actor perspective.Design/methodology/approachThrough a structured literature review on supply chain risk management in the pharmaceutical supply chain, we identified 84 risks. After shortlisting the 15 most critical ones, we applied the analytic hierarchy process to prioritize risks affecting the pharmaceutical supply chain, considering both the perspective of individual actors and the entire supply chain.FindingsThis study first analyzed the pharmaceutical supply chain risk management literature to identify the most critical risks. It then offered a novel perspective on risk prioritization through a multi-actor analytic hierarchy process, revealing how different actors assign varying levels of priority to these risks based on their unique roles and business contexts.Originality/valueRecent disruptions, such as COVID-19 and the Ukraine conflict, reshaped pharmaceutical supply chain risk priorities, revealing a ranking that diverges significantly from the literature. Each supply chain actor prioritized risks differently based on their role, highlighting a fragmented approach and emphasizing the need for more collaborative, systemic risk management. This study introduces new research directions to address unmet, real-world needs within pharmaceutical supply chain risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 62
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   A reinforcement learning-based framework for disruption risk identification in supply chains [J].
Aboutorab, Hamed ;
Hussain, Omar K. ;
Saberi, Morteza ;
Hussain, Farookh Khadeer .
FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2022, 126 :110-122
[2]  
Alicke K., 2020, McKinsey and Company, V1, P1
[3]   A collaborative multi-criteria decision making technique for risk factor prioritization [J].
Ammarapala, Veeris ;
Luxhoj, James T. .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2007, 10 (04) :465-485
[4]   Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions [J].
Baryannis, George ;
Validi, Sahar ;
Dani, Samir ;
Antoniou, Grigoris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (07) :2179-2202
[5]   A new approach for the conception of an information system related to the medicines supply chain in Morocco [J].
Benazzouz, Touria ;
Echchatbi, Abdelwahed ;
Charkaoui, Abdelkabir .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (02) :163-169
[6]   From supply chain risk to system-wide disruptions: research opportunities in forecasting, risk management and product design [J].
Browning, Tyson ;
Kumar, Maneesh ;
Sanders, Nada ;
Sodhi, ManMohan S. ;
Thuerer, Matthias ;
Tortorella, Guilherme L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 43 (12) :1841-1858
[7]   Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas [J].
Busby, Joshua W. ;
Baker, Kyri ;
Bazilian, Morgan D. ;
Gilbert, Alex Q. ;
Grubert, Emily ;
Rai, Varun ;
Rhodes, Joshua D. ;
Shidore, Sarang ;
Smith, Caitlin A. ;
Webber, Michael E. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 77
[8]  
Cannella AA, 2008, ACAD MANAGE J, V51, P768
[9]   COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review [J].
Chowdhury, Priyabrata ;
Paul, Sanjoy Kumar ;
Kaisar, Shahriar ;
Moktadir, Md. Abdul .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2021, 148
[10]  
de Oliveira B. R., 2024, Trends in Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, pe240009, DOI [10.46420/TAES.e240009, DOI 10.46420/TAES.E240009]