College Student Political Participation in the Context of a Polarized Nation and an International Pandemic: Do Campus Civic Engagement Efforts Matter?

被引:0
作者
Kumler, Lori M. [1 ]
Howell, Aaron J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Denison Univ, Informat Technol Serv, Granville, OH 43023 USA
[2] Univ Mt Union, Alliance, OH USA
关键词
College students; political participation; political socialization; political information efficacy; campus voter outreach; PERCEIVED PARTY POLARIZATION; VOTER TURNOUT; INFORMATION EFFICACY; PARTISANSHIP; NUDGE;
D O I
10.1080/15512169.2024.2414876
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
U.S. universities devote substantial resources to increasing student political engagement, especially voting; research identifies several factors affecting student political participation, including socialization theories (e.g. family, friends, school), distance from home (Niemi and Hanmer), and choice architecture (Thaler, Sunstein, and Balz). Other research suggests that increased party polarization leads to higher voter turnout (Abramowitz and Stone; Crepaz). Our study sought to understand student political behavior (voting and registration) and political polarization during fall 2020 in the context of a polarized nation and an international pandemic. Based on 326 surveys of undergraduates and in-depth follow-up interviews, where 85% of our student sample reported voting, results suggest support for several factors that contribute to voting: level of political information efficacy, participation in campus organizations and events, friends, and family. On measures of social distance ("polarization"), participants felt more distant from Trump and less distant from Biden, and participants who felt closer to Biden felt significantly more prepared to vote than participants who felt distant to Biden. Surprisingly, minority students were less likely to vote. A second analysis compared a subsample of student fraternity/sorority members ("Greek" members) from 2016 and those from 2020. The 2020 Greek members voted at higher rates and were more active on social media although voter registration rates did not differ. Results suggest that several factors contributed to student voting in our sample: parent/family encouragement, a cultivated campus voting culture, campus outreach efforts to first year students, and increased voting avenues during the pandemic.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]  
Javakhishvili Nino., 2016, An Anthology of Social Themes, pAth
[22]   Nudge Nudge, Think Think: Two Strategies for Changing Civic Behaviour [J].
John, Peter ;
Smith, Graham ;
Stoker, Gerry .
POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2009, 80 (03) :361-370
[23]   Political information efficacy and young voters - Introduction [J].
Kaid, Lynda Lee ;
McKinney, Mitchell S. ;
Tedesco, John C. .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2007, 50 (09) :1093-1111
[24]  
Kaplan Norman., 1968, Readings in Reference Group Theory and Research, P461
[25]   Bringing out the best in people: A psychological perspective [J].
Kaplan, Rachel ;
Kaplan, Stephen .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (04) :826-829
[26]   Exposure to Political Discussion in College is Associated With Higher Rates of Political Participation Over Time [J].
Klofstad, Casey A. .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2015, 32 (02) :292-309
[27]  
Krupnikov Yanna., 2022, OTHER DIVIDE POLARIZ
[28]   Using Campus Presidential Debate Watch Events to Nudge: Enlisting Reference Group Leaders and Incentives in the Quest for Increasing Student Political Participation and Efficacy [J].
Kumler, Lori M. ;
Whittaker, Brianna M. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2020, 16 (02) :176-197
[29]   Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences [J].
Layman, Geoffrey C. ;
Carsey, Thomas M. ;
Horowitz, Juliana Menasce .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 9 :83-110
[30]  
Lazarsfeld P. F., 1944, PEOPLES CHOICE VOTER