Effects of the LGS geometry on the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and the Pyramid wavefront sensor

被引:0
|
作者
Oyarzun, F. [1 ]
Heritier, C. T. [1 ]
Chambouleyron, V [2 ]
Fusco, T. [1 ,3 ]
Rouquette, P. [1 ]
Neichel, B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, LAM, CNES, CNRS, Marseille, France
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, ONERA, DOTA, F-91123 Palaiseau, France
来源
ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS IX | 2024年 / 13097卷
关键词
Wavefront sensing; Shack-Hartmann; Pyramid wavefront sensor; laser guide star;
D O I
10.1117/12.3018283
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this work we study the effects of the laser guide star (LGS) on the measurements of both the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWFS) and the Pyramid wavefront sensor (PWFS). We started by describing the LGS geometry and the general effects on each wavefront sensor. Then, we introduced a statistical analysis to predict the centroiding variance for the SHWFS when using an LGS, which we tested for read-out noise and photon noise. We found good agreement between end-to-end simulations and the predictions of the model. We found that the centroiding variance, as expected, follows closely the elongation of the LGS, with the X and Y centroiding evolving each according to the LGS geometry. For the PWFS, we used a convolutional model to compute sensitivity maps. With these maps we could observe that the size of the LGS greately decreases the sensitivity in the low frequencies. We could also obtain a better definition of the size of the LGS, which takes into account the depth of field of the telescope, which can be used to predict the sensitivity of the instrument by computing an equivalent modulation radius equivalent to the LGS size.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wavefront reconstruction for the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Topa, DM
    OPTICAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS SOFTWARE II, 2002, 4769 : 101 - 115
  • [2] RGB Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Jain, Prateek
    Schwiegerling, Jim
    JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2008, 55 (4-5) : 737 - 748
  • [3] Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor precision and accuracy
    Neal, DR
    Copland, J
    Neal, D
    ADVANCED CHARACTERIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR OPTICAL, SEMICONDUCTOR, AND DATA STORAGE COMPONENTS, 2002, 4779 : 148 - 160
  • [4] Aspheric metrology with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Greivenkamp, JE
    Smith, DG
    Gappinger, RO
    Williby, GA
    4TH IBEROAMERICAN MEETING ON OPTICS AND 7TH LATIN AMERICAN MEETING ON OPTICS, LASERS, AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2001, 4419 : 1 - 4
  • [5] The Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor for the Rubin Observatory
    Ballesta, Jerome
    Tison, Guillaume
    Meyer, Rafael
    Sebag, Jacques
    Thomas, Sandrine
    ADVANCES IN OPTICAL AND MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR TELESCOPES AND INSTRUMENTATION IV, 2020, 11451
  • [6] Detecting error of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Jiang, WH
    Xian, H
    Shen, F
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS AND APPLICATIONS, 1997, 3126 : 534 - 544
  • [7] LGS Na-spot elongation and Rayleigh scattering effects on Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor performances
    Viard, E
    Delplancke, F
    Hubin, N
    Ageorges, N
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 3762 : 8 - 19
  • [8] Electron Multiplying CMOS as Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Buton, C.
    Fereyre, P.
    Fournier, M.
    Mayer, F.
    Barbier, R.
    HIGH ENERGY, OPTICAL, AND INFRARED DETECTORS FOR ASTRONOMY VII, 2016, 9915
  • [9] A comparison of the Shack-Hartmann and pyramid wavefront sensors
    Chew, Theam Yong
    Clare, Richard M.
    Lane, Richard G.
    OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 268 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [10] A Hybrid Wavefront Sensor: Combining Shack-Hartmann and Pyramid Wavefront Sensors to Enable High Dynamic Range and Sensitivity
    Scoggins, Casey
    Wu, Oliver
    Guthery, Charlotte
    Kim, Daewook
    OPTICAL MANUFACTURING AND TESTING 2024, 2024, 13134