Efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for elective induction of labor before due date

被引:0
|
作者
Tamai, Junko [1 ]
Ikenoue, Satoru [1 ]
Akita, Keisuke [1 ]
Fukuma, Yuka [1 ]
Tanaka, Yuya [1 ]
Hasegawa, Keita [1 ]
Otani, Toshimitsu [1 ]
Kasuga, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
before due date; controlled-release PGE(2) vaginal insert; dinoprostone; labor induction; vaginal delivery; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/jog.16123
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The induction of labor before due date has recently been proved to reduce the rate of cesarean sections and is not associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes as compared to expectant management. Controlled-release dinoprostone (PGE(2)) vaginal insert has recently been approved for use in Japan. However, evidence regarding its efficacy in cervical ripening and labor induction before due date remains limited. We aimed to compare the efficacy of PGE(2) vaginal inserts and mechanical dilation for labor induction before due date. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 206 mothers at 37, 38, and 39 weeks' gestation delivered at our institution between January 2021 and October 2022. Perinatal outcomes, including the success rate of vaginal delivery, were compared between the PGE(2) (n = 46) and metreurynter/laminaria tent (non-PGE(2)) (n = 160) groups. The success rate of vaginal delivery was defined as the proportion of women who delivered vaginally within 48 h of initiating oxytocin augmentation. Results The success rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group (37/49, 80.4%) than in the non-PGE(2) group (106/177, 66.2%). Emergency cesarean section related to non-reassuring fetal status was performed with none in the PGE(2) group and with eight (5.0%) in the non-PGE(2) group. Conclusions The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group for elective labor induction between 37 and 39 weeks. The PGE(2) vaginal insert could increase the success rate of vaginal delivery for elective induction of labor at 39 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:2226 / 2230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of acidic vaginal pH on the efficacy of dinoprostone (PGE2) vaginal tablet for labor induction in full term pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial
    Panagiotopoulos, Michail
    Pergialiotis, Vasilios
    Antsaklis, Panagiotis
    Theodora, Marianna
    Sindos, Michail
    Daskalaki, Maria-Anastasia
    Koutroumanis, Pelopidas
    Daskalakis, George
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (07) : 730 - 736
  • [42] Prediction of the efficacy of dinoprostone slow release vaginal insert (Propess) for cervical ripening: A prospective cohort study
    Daykan, Yair
    Biron-Shental, Tal
    Navve, Daniella
    Miller, Netanella
    Bustan, Mor
    Sukenik-Halevy, Rivka
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (09) : 1739 - 1746
  • [43] Dinoprostone tablet versus continuous vaginal insert (Propess®) for elective induction in low-risk nulliparous women at term
    Nien, Yu-Cheng
    Kung, Hsiao-Fan
    Chen, Ming-Jer
    Chen, Wei -Chi
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (06): : 858 - 862
  • [44] The efficacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Bezircioglu, I.
    Akin, M. K.
    Baloglu, A.
    Bicer, M.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (03) : 356 - 358
  • [45] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Vallikkannu, Narayanan
    Laboh, Naumi
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Lim, Boon Kiong
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (04) : 1027 - 1036
  • [46] Oxytocin versus sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary for labor induction of unfavorable cervix with Bishop score ≥4 and ≥6: A randomized controlled trial
    Koc, Onder
    Duran, Buelent
    Ozdemirci, Safak
    Albayrak, Mustafa
    Koc, Ummugulsum
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (04) : 790 - 798
  • [47] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Narayanan Vallikkannu
    Naumi Laboh
    Peng Chiong Tan
    Jesrine Gek Shan Hong
    Mukhri Hamdan
    Boon Kiong Lim
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 1027 - 1036
  • [48] A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction
    Girija S.
    Manjunath A.P.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (2) : 153 - 160
  • [49] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Gel for Labor Induction
    Shivarudraiah, Girija
    Palaksha, Manjunath Attibele
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2011, 61 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [50] Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial
    De Bonrostro Torralba, Carlos
    Tejero Cabrejas, Eva Lucia
    Envid Lazaro, Blanca Mar
    Franco Royo, Maria Jesus
    Roca Arquillue, Montserrat
    Campillos Maza, Jose Manuel
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (07) : 913 - 919