Efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for elective induction of labor before due date

被引:0
|
作者
Tamai, Junko [1 ]
Ikenoue, Satoru [1 ]
Akita, Keisuke [1 ]
Fukuma, Yuka [1 ]
Tanaka, Yuya [1 ]
Hasegawa, Keita [1 ]
Otani, Toshimitsu [1 ]
Kasuga, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
before due date; controlled-release PGE(2) vaginal insert; dinoprostone; labor induction; vaginal delivery; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/jog.16123
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The induction of labor before due date has recently been proved to reduce the rate of cesarean sections and is not associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes as compared to expectant management. Controlled-release dinoprostone (PGE(2)) vaginal insert has recently been approved for use in Japan. However, evidence regarding its efficacy in cervical ripening and labor induction before due date remains limited. We aimed to compare the efficacy of PGE(2) vaginal inserts and mechanical dilation for labor induction before due date. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 206 mothers at 37, 38, and 39 weeks' gestation delivered at our institution between January 2021 and October 2022. Perinatal outcomes, including the success rate of vaginal delivery, were compared between the PGE(2) (n = 46) and metreurynter/laminaria tent (non-PGE(2)) (n = 160) groups. The success rate of vaginal delivery was defined as the proportion of women who delivered vaginally within 48 h of initiating oxytocin augmentation. Results The success rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group (37/49, 80.4%) than in the non-PGE(2) group (106/177, 66.2%). Emergency cesarean section related to non-reassuring fetal status was performed with none in the PGE(2) group and with eight (5.0%) in the non-PGE(2) group. Conclusions The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group for elective labor induction between 37 and 39 weeks. The PGE(2) vaginal insert could increase the success rate of vaginal delivery for elective induction of labor at 39 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:2226 / 2230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety of the use of dinoprostone gel and vaginal insert for induction of labor: A multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria
    Pellegrini, Rosamaria
    Ammar, Oumaima
    Lecis, Serena
    Huri, Mor
    Facchinetti, Fabio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2025, 168 (03) : 1039 - 1046
  • [32] Comparison of perinatal outcomes between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and metreurynter for cervical ripening in labor induction: A retrospective single-center study in Japan
    Yamaguchi, Mizuki
    Takakura, Sho
    Enomoto, Naosuke
    Teishikata, Yasuhiro
    Kitamura, Asa
    Maki, Shintaro
    Tanaka, Kayo
    Maezawa, Tadashi
    Tanaka, Hiroaki
    Ikeda, Tomoaki
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (12) : 4256 - 4262
  • [33] Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction
    Ramsey, PS
    Ogburn, PL
    Harris, DY
    Heise, RH
    Ramin, KD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (04) : 843 - 846
  • [34] Comparison of outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone vaginal insert (PROPESS) and double balloon cook catheter in term nulliparous pregnancies
    Li, Shiyu
    He, Hua
    Zheng, Wenpei
    Liu, Jing
    Chen, Chaoli
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [35] A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study
    Huang, Fenghua
    Chen, Huijun
    Wu, Xuechun
    Li, Jiafu
    Guo, Juanjuan
    Zhang, Xiaoqin
    Qiao, Yuan
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (03) : 1343 - 1350
  • [36] Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix
    Chuying Du
    Yukun Liu
    Yinglin Liu
    Hong Ding
    Rui Zhang
    Jianping Tan
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 1221 - 1227
  • [37] Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix
    Du, Chuying
    Liu, Yukun
    Liu, Yinglin
    Ding, Hong
    Zhang, Rui
    Tan, Jianping
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (06) : 1221 - 1227
  • [38] Clinical significances of Bishop score and vaginal bleeding to controlled-release dinoprostone delivery system (PROPESS) efficacy for cervical ripening: A retrospective single-center study in Japan
    Imai, Kenji
    Aoki, Chieko
    Tano, Sho
    Iitani, Yukako
    Nakamura, Noriyuki
    Ushida, Takafumi
    Kajiyama, Hiroaki
    Kotani, Tomomi
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (04) : 1154 - 1160
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of misoprostol vaginal insert vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor
    Redling, Katharina
    Schaedelin, Sabine
    Huhn, Evelyn Annegret
    Hoesli, Irene
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (02) : 176 - 182
  • [40] Safety and efficacy of mifepristone versus dinoprostone gel in induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial
    Jindal, Nidhi
    Rao, Rohini
    Dhiman, Bishan
    Kandoria, Meenakshi
    Jamwal, Ankita
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (08) : 1530 - 1535