Efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for elective induction of labor before due date

被引:0
|
作者
Tamai, Junko [1 ]
Ikenoue, Satoru [1 ]
Akita, Keisuke [1 ]
Fukuma, Yuka [1 ]
Tanaka, Yuya [1 ]
Hasegawa, Keita [1 ]
Otani, Toshimitsu [1 ]
Kasuga, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
before due date; controlled-release PGE(2) vaginal insert; dinoprostone; labor induction; vaginal delivery; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/jog.16123
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The induction of labor before due date has recently been proved to reduce the rate of cesarean sections and is not associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes as compared to expectant management. Controlled-release dinoprostone (PGE(2)) vaginal insert has recently been approved for use in Japan. However, evidence regarding its efficacy in cervical ripening and labor induction before due date remains limited. We aimed to compare the efficacy of PGE(2) vaginal inserts and mechanical dilation for labor induction before due date. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 206 mothers at 37, 38, and 39 weeks' gestation delivered at our institution between January 2021 and October 2022. Perinatal outcomes, including the success rate of vaginal delivery, were compared between the PGE(2) (n = 46) and metreurynter/laminaria tent (non-PGE(2)) (n = 160) groups. The success rate of vaginal delivery was defined as the proportion of women who delivered vaginally within 48 h of initiating oxytocin augmentation. Results The success rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group (37/49, 80.4%) than in the non-PGE(2) group (106/177, 66.2%). Emergency cesarean section related to non-reassuring fetal status was performed with none in the PGE(2) group and with eight (5.0%) in the non-PGE(2) group. Conclusions The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group for elective labor induction between 37 and 39 weeks. The PGE(2) vaginal insert could increase the success rate of vaginal delivery for elective induction of labor at 39 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:2226 / 2230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Austin, S. Campbell
    Sanchez-Ramos, Luis
    Adair, C. David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (06) : 624.e1 - 624.e9
  • [22] Dinoprostone vaginal insert vs the Foley catheter in labor induction. Observational study
    Mlodawski, Jakub
    Mlodawska, Marta
    Armanska, Justyna
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 48 (03) : 665 - 669
  • [23] Induction of labour: A comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil®) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2®)
    Kho, Ee Min
    Sadler, Lynn
    McCowan, Lesley
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 48 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [24] Induction of labor with repeated prostaglandin administration after failure of dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study comparing dinoprostone and misoprostol
    Mancarella, Matteo
    Torro, Diego Costa
    Moggio, Giulia
    Bounous, Valentina E.
    Biglia, Nicoletta
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, : 19 - 26
  • [25] Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction:: A randomized controlled trial
    Dällenbach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [26] Pre-induction cervical ripening in post-term pregnancies with a vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone pessary
    Lo Dico, G.
    Fasullo, P.
    Bagarella, D.
    Barreca, P. V.
    Lucido, A. M.
    Pollina, A.
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI OSTETRICIA E GINECOLOGIA, 2006, 28 (10-11): : 487 - 490
  • [27] Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean section: a retrospective comparative study
    Rodriguez Gomez, Leire
    Burgos, Jorge
    Cobos, Patricia
    Carlos Melchor, Juan
    Osuna, Carmen
    del Mar Centeno, Maria
    Larrieta, Rosa
    Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis
    Martinez-Astorquiza, Txanton
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (04) : 397 - 402
  • [28] Vaginal dinoprostone insert compared with two different oral misoprostol regimens for labor induction in nulliparous and multiparous women
    Erhardt, Damaris
    Radan, Anda
    Mathis, Jerome
    Surbek, Daniel
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 103 (11) : 2306 - 2313
  • [29] Effects of intravaginally inserted controlled-release dinoprostone and oxytocin for labor induction on umbilical cord blood gas parameters
    Keskin, Huseyin Levent
    Kabacaoglu, Gokalp
    Secen, Elcin Islek
    Ustuner, Isik
    Yegin, Gulin
    Avsar, Ayse Filiz
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 13 (04) : 257 - 260
  • [30] Effect of vaginal washing before intravaginal dinoprostone insertion for labor induction: A randomized clinical trial
    Abide, Cigdem Yayla
    Eken, Meryem Kurek
    Ozkaya, Enis
    Yenidede, Ilter
    Ergen, Evrim Bostanci
    Kilicci, Cetin
    Sanverdi, Ilhan
    Eroglu, Mustafa
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (12) : 2149 - 2155