Efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for elective induction of labor before due date

被引:0
|
作者
Tamai, Junko [1 ]
Ikenoue, Satoru [1 ]
Akita, Keisuke [1 ]
Fukuma, Yuka [1 ]
Tanaka, Yuya [1 ]
Hasegawa, Keita [1 ]
Otani, Toshimitsu [1 ]
Kasuga, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Tanaka, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
before due date; controlled-release PGE(2) vaginal insert; dinoprostone; labor induction; vaginal delivery; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1111/jog.16123
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim The induction of labor before due date has recently been proved to reduce the rate of cesarean sections and is not associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes as compared to expectant management. Controlled-release dinoprostone (PGE(2)) vaginal insert has recently been approved for use in Japan. However, evidence regarding its efficacy in cervical ripening and labor induction before due date remains limited. We aimed to compare the efficacy of PGE(2) vaginal inserts and mechanical dilation for labor induction before due date. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 206 mothers at 37, 38, and 39 weeks' gestation delivered at our institution between January 2021 and October 2022. Perinatal outcomes, including the success rate of vaginal delivery, were compared between the PGE(2) (n = 46) and metreurynter/laminaria tent (non-PGE(2)) (n = 160) groups. The success rate of vaginal delivery was defined as the proportion of women who delivered vaginally within 48 h of initiating oxytocin augmentation. Results The success rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group (37/49, 80.4%) than in the non-PGE(2) group (106/177, 66.2%). Emergency cesarean section related to non-reassuring fetal status was performed with none in the PGE(2) group and with eight (5.0%) in the non-PGE(2) group. Conclusions The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE(2) group for elective labor induction between 37 and 39 weeks. The PGE(2) vaginal insert could increase the success rate of vaginal delivery for elective induction of labor at 39 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:2226 / 2230
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of Vaginal pH on Efficacy of Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening/Labor Induction: A Prospective Double-Blind Study
    Onen, Fiahin
    Ozaksit, Gulnur
    Yilmaz, Bulent
    Gungor, Tayfun
    Bilge, Umit
    Sut, Necdet
    Mollamahmutoglu, Leyla
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 9 (04) : 206 - 211
  • [2] Optimal cervical-ripening method for labor induction in Japan after the era of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert
    Furuya, Natsumi
    Hasegawa, Junichi
    Saji, Shota
    Homma, Chika
    Nishimura, Yoko
    Suzuki, Nao
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [3] A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening
    Silfeler, Dilek B.
    Tandogan, Bulent
    Ayvaci, Habibe
    Silfeler, Ibrahim
    Yenidede, Ilter
    Dayicioglu, Vedat
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 284 (06) : 1331 - 1337
  • [4] Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Hongye
    Hong, Shukun
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Duan, Yan
    Yin, Hongmei
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (14) : 2382 - 2388
  • [5] Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert
    Maggi, Claudia
    Mazzoni, Giorgia
    Gerosa, Vera
    Fratelli, Nicola
    Prefumo, Federico
    Sartori, Enrico
    Lojacono, Andrea
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (10) : 1268 - 1273
  • [6] A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening
    Dilek B. Silfeler
    Bulent Tandogan
    Habibe Ayvaci
    Ibrahim Silfeler
    Ilter Yenidede
    Vedat Dayicioglu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 284 : 1331 - 1337
  • [7] Effect of vaginal douching with normal saline before insertion of dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction
    Verma, Manju Lata
    Pandey, Manjari
    Singh, Uma
    Sachan, Rekha
    Sankhwar, Pushp Lata
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 13 (01) : 265 - 270
  • [8] Original Using dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor: A single institute experience
    Tseng, Jen-Yu
    Lin, I-Chia
    Chang, Wen-Hsun
    Yeh, Chang-Ching
    Horng, Huann-Cheng
    Wang, Peng-Hui
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 59 (05): : 723 - 727
  • [9] Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial
    Sebiha Özkan
    Eray Çalışkan
    Emek Doğer
    İzzet Yücesoy
    Semih Özeren
    Birol Vural
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 280 : 19 - 24
  • [10] Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial
    Ozkan, Sebiha
    Caliskan, Eray
    Doger, Emek
    Yucesoy, Izzet
    Ozeren, Semih
    Vural, Birol
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 280 (01) : 19 - 24