A Robust Human-Autonomy Collaboration Framework With Experimental Validation

被引:0
|
作者
Uzun, M. Yusuf [1 ]
Inanc, Emirhan [1 ]
Yildiz, Yildiray [1 ]
机构
[1] Bilkent Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkiye
来源
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS | 2024年 / 8卷
关键词
Adaptation models; Long short term memory; Mathematical models; Collaboration; Training; Automation; Vectors; Shared control; adaptive control; human in the loop; long short term memory; uncertain systems; SHARED CONTROL;
D O I
10.1109/LCSYS.2024.3467188
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this letter, we introduce a robust human-autonomy collaboration framework focusing on flight control applications. The objective is to optimize performance by always keeping the human operator in control of the vehicle while compensating for human limitations. A significant aspect of this framework is its robustness to human intent estimation errors. This is achieved by precisely modulating the automation assistance to prevent undesired interference with the human operator. We provide human-in-the-loop experimental results, demonstrating significant performance improvements when intent estimation is accurate. Experiments also validate that the pilots maintain vehicle control even when the estimation is faulty.
引用
收藏
页码:2313 / 2318
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2017, 46 : 3 - 12
  • [22] Modelling situated intent for human-autonomy teaming: a human-centric approach
    Hammarback, Jimmy
    Johansson, Bjoern J. E.
    Alfredson, Jens
    Lundberg, Jonas
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2024, 25 (06) : 731 - 752
  • [23] The Evaluation of a Playbook Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming in Single Pilot Operations
    Tokadli, Guliz
    Dorneich, Michael C.
    Matessa, Michael
    Eda, Seiya
    2019 IEEE/AIAA 38TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2019,
  • [24] A conceptual model of team dynamical behaviors and performance in human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    Amazeen, Polemnia G.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 52 : 497 - 507
  • [25] A supportive situation awareness model for human-autonomy teaming in collaborative driving
    Kridalukmana, Rinta
    Lu, Hai Yan
    Naderpour, Mohsen
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2020, 21 (06) : 658 - 683
  • [26] Testing Human-Autonomy Teaming Concepts on a Global Positioning System Interface
    Russell, Ricky
    HUMAN INTERFACE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION: INFORMATION IN APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, HIMI 2018 HELD AS PART OF HCII 2018, PART II, 2018, 10905 : 450 - 464
  • [27] Evaluating Effects of Enhanced Autonomy Transparency on Trust, Dependence, and Human-Autonomy Team Performance over Time
    Luo, Ruikun
    Du, Na
    Yang, X. Jessie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2022, 38 (18-20) : 1962 - 1971
  • [28] Application of Human-Autonomy Teaming to an Advanced Ground Station for Reduced Crew Operations
    Ho, Nhut
    Johnson, Walter
    Panesar, Karanvir
    Wakeland, Kenny
    Sadler, Garrett
    Wilson, Nathan
    Bao Nguyen
    Lachter, Joel
    Brandt, Summer
    2017 IEEE/AIAA 36TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2017,
  • [29] Towards Neuro-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning For Trustworthy Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Gurung, Priti
    Li, Jiang
    Rawat, Danda B.
    ASSURANCE AND SECURITY FOR AI-ENABLED SYSTEMS, 2024, 13054
  • [30] Trusting machine intelligence: artificial intelligence and human-autonomy teaming in military operations
    Mayer, Michael
    DEFENCE AND SECURITY ANALYSIS, 2023, 39 (04): : 521 - 538