Acetabular Augments Used in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-year Follow-Up of Implant Survivorships, Functional Scores, and Radiographic Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Braunstein, Doris [1 ]
Greenberg, Arieh [1 ,2 ]
Chaudhry, Faran [1 ,3 ]
Daud, Anser [1 ,2 ]
Sa, Oleg A. [1 ,2 ]
Gross, Allan E. [1 ,2 ]
Kuzyk, Paul R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; acetabular defect; acetabular augment; hip; flying buttress augment; dome augment; TRABECULAR METAL AUGMENTS; POROUS TANTALUM AUGMENTS; PELVIC DISCONTINUITY; BONE LOSS; DEFECTS; RECONSTRUCTION; COMPONENT; CAGE; ALLOGRAFT; RING;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acetabular bone loss is a major challenge in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous tantalum augments have emerged as a viable solution to acetabular bone loss in revision THA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, clinical, and radiological outcomes of these implants. Methods: We identified 104 augment implants from our retrospective chart review of revision THA from June 2003 to July 2013. Of these patients, 75 (72.1%) were women, the mean age at surgery was 66 years (range, 27 to 87), and the mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range, 0.25 to 18.2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, with failure defined as revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular reconstruction. Results: There was significant improvement in the Harris Hip Score from 40.0 to 77.3 (P < 0.001) and the Oxford Hip Score from 14.9 to 36.3 (P < 0.001). Survivorship for failure due to aseptic loosening was 98.8% (95% CI [confidence interval] 96.4 to 100) at 24 months with 60 hips at risk, and 90.4% (95% CI 83.0 to 97.8) at 60 and 120 months with 38 and 18 hips at risk, respectively. The overall number of complications was 34 (32.7%). Of these complications, 21 (20.2%) required repeat revision surgery. The revision rate due to aseptic loosening of the augment, infection, dislocation, aseptic loosening of the femoral component, reconstruction failure, and heterotopic ossification was seven (6.7%), five (4.8%), four (3.8%), two (1.9%), two (1.9%), and one (0.96%), respectively. Conclusions: Treatment of acetabular defects during revision THA using porous tantalum augments provides acceptable implant survivorship and favorable clinical outcomes at mid-term (5 to 10 years) and long-term (> 10 years) follow-up. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 757
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High survivorship of highly cross-linked polyethylene in revision Total hip Arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study
    Lim, Seung-Jae
    Yeo, Ingwon
    Park, Chan-Woo
    Lee, Kyung-Jae
    Min, Byung-Woo
    Park, Youn-Soo
    ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 1 (01)
  • [22] Anterior Cortical Window Technique Instead of Extended Trochanteric osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
    Park, Chan Ho
    Yeom, Jiung
    Park, Jung-Wee
    Won, Seok Hyung
    Lee, Young-Kyun
    Koo, Kyung-Hoi
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 11 (04) : 396 - 402
  • [23] High survivorship of highly cross-linked polyethylene in revision Total hip Arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up study
    Seung-Jae Lim
    Ingwon Yeo
    Chan-Woo Park
    Kyung-Jae Lee
    Byung-Woo Min
    Youn-Soo Park
    Arthroplasty, 1
  • [24] Acetabular reconstruction using a roof reinforcement ring with hook for total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip-osteoarthritis - Minimum 10-year follow-up results
    Siebenrock, KA
    Tannast, M
    Kim, S
    Morgenstern, W
    Ganz, R
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (04) : 492 - 498
  • [25] Radiographic Progression of Osteoarthritis after Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up Outcome According to the Tonnis Grade
    Min, Byung-Woo
    Kang, Chang Soo
    Lee, Kyung-Jae
    Bae, Ki-Cheor
    Cho, Chul-Hyun
    Choi, Jung-Hoon
    Sohn, Hyuk-Joon
    Sin, Hong-Kwan
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [26] Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum A MINIMUM FIVE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY
    Gibon, E.
    Barut, N.
    Courpied, J-P
    Hamadouche, M.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (06) : 725 - 732
  • [27] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up
    Yoshino, Kensuke
    Tsukeoka, Tadashi
    Tsuneizumi, Yoshikazu
    Lee, Tae Hyun
    Nakamura, Junichi
    Suzuki, Masahiko
    Ohtori, Seiji
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (11) : 3495 - 3501
  • [28] A 2-to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup
    Stigbrand, Hampus
    Gustafsson, Oscar
    Ullmark, Gosta
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (03) : 815 - 822
  • [29] Use of constrained acetabular components for hip instability: An average 10-year follow-up study
    Bremner, BRB
    Goetz, DD
    Callaghan, JJ
    Capello, WN
    Johnston, RC
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (07) : 131 - 137
  • [30] Hip Squeaking A 10-Year Follow-Up Study
    Chevillotte, Christophe
    Pibarot, Vincent
    Carret, Jean-Paul
    Bejui-Hugues, Jacques
    Guyen, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (06) : 1008 - 1013