Acetabular Augments Used in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 10-year Follow-Up of Implant Survivorships, Functional Scores, and Radiographic Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Braunstein, Doris [1 ]
Greenberg, Arieh [1 ,2 ]
Chaudhry, Faran [1 ,3 ]
Daud, Anser [1 ,2 ]
Sa, Oleg A. [1 ,2 ]
Gross, Allan E. [1 ,2 ]
Kuzyk, Paul R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; acetabular defect; acetabular augment; hip; flying buttress augment; dome augment; TRABECULAR METAL AUGMENTS; POROUS TANTALUM AUGMENTS; PELVIC DISCONTINUITY; BONE LOSS; DEFECTS; RECONSTRUCTION; COMPONENT; CAGE; ALLOGRAFT; RING;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.09.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acetabular bone loss is a major challenge in the setting of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Porous tantalum augments have emerged as a viable solution to acetabular bone loss in revision THA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, clinical, and radiological outcomes of these implants. Methods: We identified 104 augment implants from our retrospective chart review of revision THA from June 2003 to July 2013. Of these patients, 75 (72.1%) were women, the mean age at surgery was 66 years (range, 27 to 87), and the mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range, 0.25 to 18.2). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, with failure defined as revision for aseptic loosening of the acetabular reconstruction. Results: There was significant improvement in the Harris Hip Score from 40.0 to 77.3 (P < 0.001) and the Oxford Hip Score from 14.9 to 36.3 (P < 0.001). Survivorship for failure due to aseptic loosening was 98.8% (95% CI [confidence interval] 96.4 to 100) at 24 months with 60 hips at risk, and 90.4% (95% CI 83.0 to 97.8) at 60 and 120 months with 38 and 18 hips at risk, respectively. The overall number of complications was 34 (32.7%). Of these complications, 21 (20.2%) required repeat revision surgery. The revision rate due to aseptic loosening of the augment, infection, dislocation, aseptic loosening of the femoral component, reconstruction failure, and heterotopic ossification was seven (6.7%), five (4.8%), four (3.8%), two (1.9%), two (1.9%), and one (0.96%), respectively. Conclusions: Treatment of acetabular defects during revision THA using porous tantalum augments provides acceptable implant survivorship and favorable clinical outcomes at mid-term (5 to 10 years) and long-term (> 10 years) follow-up. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 757
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Custom Triflange Acetabular Components for Large Acetabular Defects: Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
    Moore, K. David
    McClenny, Michelle D.
    Wills, Bradley W.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 41 (03) : E316 - E320
  • [2] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring with a Metal Augment: A Minimum Eight-Year Follow-Up Study
    Kim, Han Soul
    Kim, Ji Wan
    Chang, Jae Suk
    Kim, Chul-Ho
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (06):
  • [3] Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up
    Sakai, Takashi
    Ohzono, Kenji
    Nishii, Takashi
    Takao, Masaki
    Miki, Hidenobu
    Nakamura, Nobuo
    Sugano, Nobuhiko
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (04) : 605 - 610
  • [4] Acetabular Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Impacted Morselized Allograft and a Cementless Cup Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up
    Lee, Joong-Myung
    Nam, Hee-Tae
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (07) : 1057 - 1060
  • [5] Acetabular Distraction Technique: A Multicenter Study With a Minimum 2-Year Radiographic Follow-Up
    Melnic, Christopher M.
    Salimy, Mehdi S.
    Minutillo, Gregory T.
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    Sheth, Neil P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09) : S398 - S403
  • [6] Cup-Cage Construct for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean Follow-Up of 7.7 Years
    Chaudhry, Faran
    Daud, Anser
    Greenberg, Arieh
    Braunstein, Doris
    Safir, Oleg A.
    Gross, Allan E.
    Kuzyk, Paul R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (10) : 2555 - 2560
  • [7] Results of revision total hip arthroplasty with Anatomic BR stem: 10-year minimum follow-up
    Tsukeoka, Tadashi
    Lee, Tae Hyun
    Tsuruoka, Hiroaki
    Murata, Tadao
    Suzuki, Masahiko
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2011, 21 (05) : 482 - 487
  • [8] Custom Triflange Acetabular Implants: Average 10-Year Follow-Up
    Meding, John B.
    Meding, Lindsey K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07) : S201 - S205
  • [9] Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up
    Takashi Sakai
    Kenji Ohzono
    Takashi Nishii
    Masaki Takao
    Hidenobu Miki
    Nobuo Nakamura
    Nobuhiko Sugano
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 605 - 610
  • [10] Extended Fixation for Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-Up of 2 Years
    Tang, Hao
    Huang, Yong
    Zhou, Yixin
    Ma, Zhuyi
    Guo, Shengjie
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (01) : 205 - 213