Propofol Priming for Enhancing Induction Safety in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yadav, Tarun [1 ]
Golhar, Mayuri [1 ]
Saini, Chhavi [1 ]
机构
[1] Pt BD Sharma PGIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Dose; Hypotension; General anaesthesia; COINDUCTION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2025/76353.20448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Propofol is popular for inducing general anaesthesia, but it has drawbacks such as hypotension and bradycardia in a dose-dependent manner, especially in hypertensive patients. Reducing the total dose of Propofol using the priming principle has proven to be effective; however, it has not been studied in high-risk hypertensive patients. Therefore, the current study was planned. Aim: To evaluate the effects of priming on Propofol induction in controlled hypertensive patients, with objectives to assess haemodynamic parameters, total dose, and side- effects. Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, double-blind randomised controlled trail was performed at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma (B.D.) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS) Rohtak, Haryana, India, from April 2023 to April 2024. A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with controlled hypertension were randomly assigned to either Group 1 (study group, n=30), where Propofol priming was used, or Group 2 (control group, n=30). Demographics, total Propofol dose, haemodynamic parameters {Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)}, and adverse events were evaluated using International Bussiness Machine (IBM) Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normalisation, and the Mann's-Whitney U test, Independent t-test, and Chi-square test were used for data analysis. Results: In Group 1 (study), the mean age was 49.36 +/- 9.42 years, while in Group 2 (control), it was 49.36 +/- 9.19 years (p=0.91). A lesser dose of Propofol was needed in the study group (Group 1) (90.07 +/- 19.73 mg) compared to the control group (Group 2) (120.00 +/- 21.81 mg) (p=0.001). Haemodynamic alterations were more pronounced in the controls compared to the study group. After induction, a significant fall in MAP was observed in the controls compared to the study group (67.63 +/- 5.86 mmHg vs. 90.63 +/- 4.33 mmHg) (p=0.001). Adverse effects, such as pain at the injection site, were reported in one patient (n=1) in Group 2. Conclusion: The priming principle significantly reduces the total Propofol dose and leads to more stable haemodynamics during general anaesthesia induction in controlled hypertensive patients. Priming with Propofol is advised for patients with hypertension when inducing general anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:UC1 / UC5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gabapentin Use in Pediatric Spinal Fusion Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
    Rusy, Lynn M.
    Hainsworth, Keri R.
    Nelson, Tom J.
    Czarnecki, Michelle L.
    Tassone, J. Channing
    Thometz, John G.
    Lyon, Roger M.
    Berens, Richard J.
    Weisman, Steven J.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 110 (05): : 1393 - 1398
  • [32] A randomized, prospective double-blind comparison of the efficacy of generic propofol (sulphite additive) with Diprivan®
    Olufolabi, AJ
    Gan, TJ
    Lacassie, HJ
    White, WD
    Habib, AS
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (04) : 341 - 345
  • [33] Pain on Injection of MCT/LCT Preparations of Propofol and Etomidate: A Double-blind Randomised Comparative Study
    Dutta, Harsaprava
    Chattopadhyay, Suman
    Pal, Rita
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (02)
  • [34] Ketofol as an Anesthetic Agent in Patients With Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial
    Maheswari, Neha
    Panda, Nidhi B.
    Mahajan, Shalvi
    Luthra, Ankur
    Pattnaik, Smita
    Bhatia, Nidhi
    Karthigeyan, Madhivanan
    Kaloria, Narender
    Chauhan, Rajeev
    Soni, Shiv
    Jangra, Kiran
    Bhagat, Hemant
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 35 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [35] Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring between propofol and remimazolam during total intravenous anesthesia in the cervical spine surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Myoung Hwa
    Park, Jinyoung
    Park, Yoon Ghil
    Cho, Yong Eun
    Kim, Dawoon
    Lee, Dong Jun
    Kwak, Kyu Wan
    Lee, Jongyun
    Han, Dong Woo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 78 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [36] The effects of ciprofol on haemodynamics under general anaesthesia during thoracoscopic surgery: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
    Lifang Lan
    Jianping Liao
    Liuying Qin
    Xuemei Wang
    Tan Qin
    Yanhua Chen
    Jingchen Liu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 25 (1)
  • [37] Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study
    Meng, Qing-Tao
    Cao, Chen
    Liu, Hui-Min
    Xia, Zhong-Yuan
    Li, Wei
    Tang, Ling-Hua
    Chen, Rong
    Jiang, Meng
    Wu, Yang
    Leng, Yan
    Lee, Chris C.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (03) : 1515 - 1524
  • [38] A double-blind randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of topical lidocaine in extended flexible endoscopic nasal examinations
    Bonaparte, J. P.
    Javidnia, H.
    Kilty, S.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 36 (06) : 550 - 557
  • [39] The safety and efficacy of alfentanil combined with midazolam in fiberoptic bronchoscopy sedation: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Wang, Longfei
    Wu, Qiuyue
    Wang, Ming
    Ming, Wanquan
    Sheng, Cheng
    Zhang, Yonghua
    Chen, Yongbin
    Cao, Yunfei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [40] A randomized double-blind controlled study of the efficacy of ketofol with propofol-fentanyl and propofol alone in termination of pregnancy
    Wang, Yanfen
    Jiang, Xi
    Pang, Lei
    Dong, Su
    Feng, Yanhua
    Prajapati, Sujan Surya
    Yuan, Changji
    Ma, Haichun
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 6 (34): : 2510 - 2514