Propofol Priming for Enhancing Induction Safety in Hypertensive Patients: A Prospective Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Yadav, Tarun [1 ]
Golhar, Mayuri [1 ]
Saini, Chhavi [1 ]
机构
[1] Pt BD Sharma PGIMS, Dept Anaesthesiol, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Dose; Hypotension; General anaesthesia; COINDUCTION; ANESTHESIA;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2025/76353.20448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Propofol is popular for inducing general anaesthesia, but it has drawbacks such as hypotension and bradycardia in a dose-dependent manner, especially in hypertensive patients. Reducing the total dose of Propofol using the priming principle has proven to be effective; however, it has not been studied in high-risk hypertensive patients. Therefore, the current study was planned. Aim: To evaluate the effects of priming on Propofol induction in controlled hypertensive patients, with objectives to assess haemodynamic parameters, total dose, and side- effects. Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, double-blind randomised controlled trail was performed at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Pt. Bhagwat Dayal Sharma (B.D.) Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (PGIMS) Rohtak, Haryana, India, from April 2023 to April 2024. A total of 60 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with controlled hypertension were randomly assigned to either Group 1 (study group, n=30), where Propofol priming was used, or Group 2 (control group, n=30). Demographics, total Propofol dose, haemodynamic parameters {Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)}, and adverse events were evaluated using International Bussiness Machine (IBM) Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normalisation, and the Mann's-Whitney U test, Independent t-test, and Chi-square test were used for data analysis. Results: In Group 1 (study), the mean age was 49.36 +/- 9.42 years, while in Group 2 (control), it was 49.36 +/- 9.19 years (p=0.91). A lesser dose of Propofol was needed in the study group (Group 1) (90.07 +/- 19.73 mg) compared to the control group (Group 2) (120.00 +/- 21.81 mg) (p=0.001). Haemodynamic alterations were more pronounced in the controls compared to the study group. After induction, a significant fall in MAP was observed in the controls compared to the study group (67.63 +/- 5.86 mmHg vs. 90.63 +/- 4.33 mmHg) (p=0.001). Adverse effects, such as pain at the injection site, were reported in one patient (n=1) in Group 2. Conclusion: The priming principle significantly reduces the total Propofol dose and leads to more stable haemodynamics during general anaesthesia induction in controlled hypertensive patients. Priming with Propofol is advised for patients with hypertension when inducing general anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:UC1 / UC5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraoperative methadone for day-case gynaecological laparoscopy: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial
    Green, Kyle W.
    Popovic, Gordana
    Baitch, Luke
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 52 (03) : 168 - 179
  • [22] A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy
    Mandel, Jeff E.
    Tanner, Jonathan W.
    Lichtenstein, Gary R.
    Metz, David C.
    Katzka, David A.
    Ginsberg, Gregory G.
    Kochman, Michael L.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (02): : 434 - 439
  • [23] Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Jiejuan Chen
    Xiaohua Zou
    Bailong Hu
    Yang Yang
    Feng Wang
    Qian Zhou
    Minhuan Shen
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [24] Bispectral index-guided comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant with propofol to achieve an adequate depth for endotracheal intubation - A double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Choudhary, Annu
    Singh, Swati
    Alam, Faseehullah
    Kumar, Harsh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (04) : 334 - 339
  • [25] Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Remimazolam Tosilate Applied in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial
    Cui, Xiaozhen
    Cheng, Zhi
    Li, Han
    Zhang, Xiaobao
    Luan, Hengfei
    Zhao, Zhibin
    Zhu, Pin
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 2889 - 2896
  • [26] Safety and efficacy of fentanyl versus pethidine in cataract surgery under propofol- based sedation: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial
    Shetabi, Hamidreza
    Hashemi, Seyed
    Haghi, Fariba
    Farsani, Dariush Moradi
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 25
  • [27] Interleaved Propofol-Ketamine Maintains DBS Physiology and Hemodynamic Stability: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kornilov, Evgeniya
    Erdman, Halen Baker
    Kahana, Eilat
    Fireman, Shlomo
    Zarchi, Omer
    Israelashvili, Michal
    Reiner, Johnathan
    Glik, Amir
    Weiss, Penina
    Paz, Rony
    Bergman, Hagai
    Tamir, Idit
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2024, 39 (04) : 694 - 705
  • [28] Effect of gabapentin on pain after cardiac surgery: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Rapchuk, I. L.
    O'Connell, L.
    Liessmann, C. D.
    Cornelissen, H. R.
    Fraser, J. F.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2010, 38 (03) : 445 - 451
  • [29] Effect of pneumatic leg compression on post-induction hypotension in elderly patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Park, J. -Y.
    Yu, J.
    Kim, C. -S.
    Baek, J. -W.
    Jo, Y.
    Kim, Y. -K.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 (06) : 730 - 738
  • [30] Ketamine/Propofol Versus Midazolam/Fentanyl for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Trial
    Nejati, Amir
    Moharari, Reza Shariat
    Ashraf, Haleh
    Labaf, Ali
    Golshani, Keihan
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (08) : 800 - 806