Transformative Routes to Sustainable Development: The Nexus Between Fiscal Decentralization and Sustainable Environment in Developing Countries

被引:2
作者
Ali, Sajjad [1 ]
Gill, Abid Rashid [1 ]
Ali, Minhaj [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamia Univ Bahawalpur, Dept Econ, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
[2] European Univ Lefke, Adv Res Ctr, TR-10, Mersin, Northern Cyprus, Turkiye
关键词
fiscal decentralization; environmental sustainability index; institutional quality index; developing economies; CS-ARDL; NONRENEWABLE ENERGY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; KUZNETS CURVE; CO2; EMISSIONS; PURE THEORY; QUALITY; IMPACT; POLICY; PERSPECTIVE; TRADE;
D O I
10.1177/10704965241295757
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The debate on fiscal decentralization (FD)'s potential impact on environmental sustainability is expanding, but actual evidence is few. A balanced dataset of 21 developing nations from 2000 to 2020 is used to explore how FD impacts environmental sustainability. We employ second-generation unit root tests, Westerlund cointegration, and cross-section autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) models for empirical assessment. In addition, a novel Environmental Sustainable Development Index (ESDI) is used. The results demonstrate FD enhances ESDI. Economic growth, total natural resource rent, and population growth impair sustainability, while institutional quality enhances it. Eco-friendly natural resource exploitation helps countries become more sustainable. These goals require modern sustainable development methods. Analysis of FD and institutional quality policies reveals how nations combat environmental pollution, providing policymakers with empirical evidence for global climate change initiatives. According to the findings, local governments should be empowered to reduce emissions, mitigate environmental harm, and establish sustainable industrial practices.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 317
页数:27
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change, and economic growth [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, J .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (03) :546-579
[2]  
Agnolucci P, 2017, J ENVIRON ECON POLIC, V6, P415, DOI 10.1080/21606544.2017.1325780
[3]   A path towards environmental sustainability: The role of clean energy and democracy in ecological footprint of Pakistan [J].
Ahmed, Zahoor ;
Caglar, Abdullah Emre ;
Murshed, Muntasir .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 358
[4]  
Baoping R., 2018, REFORM, V4, P5
[5]  
BARRERA-ROLDAN A., 2002, ECOL INDIC, V2, P251, DOI [10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00058-4, DOI 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00058-4]
[6]   Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries [J].
Bekun, Festus Victor ;
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 657 :1023-1029
[7]   Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries [J].
Ben Jebli, Mehdi ;
Ben Youssef, Slim ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 :824-831
[8]   Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach [J].
Besley, T ;
Coate, S .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2003, 87 (12) :2611-2637
[9]  
Bodman Philip., 2009, Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach
[10]   Measuring the immeasurable -: A survey of sustainability indices [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Jochem, Patrick E. P. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (01) :1-8