The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology - Assessment of utility and the risk of malignancy

被引:0
|
作者
Prakash, Annu E. [1 ,2 ]
Sukumaran, Renu [1 ]
Nayak, Nileena [1 ]
Lakshmi, K. [1 ,3 ]
Mathews, Anitha [1 ]
Kattoor, Jayasree [1 ]
机构
[1] Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
[2] Sree Narayana Inst Med Sci, Dept Pathol, Kunnukara, Kerala, India
[3] KIMS Hosp, Dept Pathol, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
关键词
Fine-needle biopsy; predictive value of tests; salivary glands; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; CYTOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS; EXPERIENCE; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.4103/ijc.IJC_158_21
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background:Cytological diagnosis of salivary gland lesions furnishes several challenges to pathologists and clinicians owing to their diverse morphology and varying reporting terminology. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology was proposed to overcome these defects. The aim of this study was to grade histopathologically diagnosed cases of salivary gland pathology using Milan system and to correlate Milan system with histopathological diagnosis. The study aims to assess the utility of the Milan system and the risk of malignancy in each category.Materials and Methods:This is a retrospective study of 4 years duration. All the cases of salivary gland pathology with fine-needle aspiration cytology findings from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrieved and classified according to the Milan system. Histopathology follow-up of these cases were reviewed from the archives, and risk of malignancy was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard.Results:Cytology slides of 151 cases were reviewed, and the Milan system was applied. Histopathology follow-up was obtained in 94 cases (attrition rate = 37.74%). The percentage of cases in each category were as follows: nondiagnostic = 9.27%, nonneoplastic = 4.64%, atypia of undetermined significance = 3.97%, benign neoplasm = 23.84%, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential = 8.61%, suspicious for malignancy = 11.92%, and malignant = 37.75%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Milan system were 94.20%, 96.00%, 98.48%, and 85.71%, respectively.Conclusion:The Milan system has high sensitivity and specificity in comparison with histopathology. This system proves helpful to the pathologist as well as the clinician in achieving uniformity of reporting terminology by classifying salivary gland lesions into subcategories with prognostic relevance.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 582
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retrospective application of the Milan System for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: A Cancer Center experience
    Leite, Amanda Almeida
    Vargas, Pablo Agustin
    dos Santos Silva, Alan Roger
    Galvis, Marisol Miranda
    de Sa, Raisa Sales
    Lopes Pinto, Clovis Antonio
    Kowalski, Luiz Paulo
    Saieg, Mauro
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 48 (09) : 821 - 826
  • [32] Enhanced performance of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: Point of view from an Asian country
    Higuchi, Kayoko
    Urano, Makoto
    Nakaguro, Masato
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 128 (05) : 305 - 306
  • [33] Cytological features of a lymphoepithelial cyst of the salivary gland with application of the second edition of Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology
    Ishida, Mitsuaki
    Kataoka, Isako
    Tomiuka, Mari
    Okanishi, Hiroyuki
    Ariga, Kozue
    Uragami, Mayumi
    Deguchi, Chihiro
    Ono, Shizuka
    Takeda, Reika
    Hirose, Yoshinobu
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 21 (02)
  • [34] Risk stratification and clinical outcome in the atypia of undetermined significance category in the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology
    Wangsiricharoen, Sintawat
    Maleki, Zahra
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 129 (02) : 132 - 139
  • [35] Implementation of the MILAN system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: Interobserver concordance and cytohistological correlation of discordant cases
    Garg, Neha
    Diwaker, Preeti
    Pathak, Priya
    Aggarwal, Divya
    Arora, Vinod K.
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 47 (08) : 769 - 775
  • [36] The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC): An ASC-IAC-Sponsored System for Reporting Salivary Gland Fine-Needle Aspiration
    Rossi, Esther Diana
    Baloch, Zubair W.
    Pusztaszeri, Marc
    Faquin, William C.
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2018, 62 (03) : 157 - 165
  • [37] Comparative analysis of inter-observer variability between conventional reporting system of salivary gland cytology with Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology
    Khan, Lubna
    Sudarsini, Saheeta
    Mishra, Vandana
    Dwivedi, Shobha
    Kala, Chayanika
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 50 (06) : 295 - 299
  • [38] The Second Edition of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: System Application, Outcome, and Cytohistological Correlation
    Onyszczuk, Magdalena
    Drozdzowska, Bogna
    JOURNAL OF CYTOLOGY, 2025, 42 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [39] The Role of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A 5-Year Institutional Experience
    Viswanathan, Kartik
    Sung, Simon
    Scognamiglio, Theresa
    Yang, Grace C. H.
    Siddiqui, Momin T.
    Rao, Rema A.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 126 (08) : 541 - 551
  • [40] Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology- An experience from Western Indian Population
    Gaikwad, Vaishali
    Anupriya, Chanda
    Naik, Leena
    JOURNAL OF CYTOLOGY, 2020, 37 (02) : 93 - 98