Political ideology shapes support for the use of AI in policy-making

被引:0
|
作者
Gur, Tamar [1 ]
Hameiri, Boaz [2 ]
Maaravi, Yossi [1 ]
机构
[1] Reichman Univ, Adelson Sch Entrepreneurship, Herzliyya, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Social & Policy Studies, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); political ideology; artificial intelligence in governance; technology acceptance; governance; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; BIAS; CONSERVATIVES; PERSONALITY; ACCEPTANCE; CHATGPT; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2024.1447171
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In a world grappling with technological advancements, the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in governance is becoming increasingly realistic. While some may find this possibility incredibly alluring, others may see it as dystopian. Society must account for these varied opinions when implementing new technologies or regulating and limiting them. This study (N = 703) explored Leftists' (liberals) and Rightists' (conservatives) support for using AI in governance decision-making amidst an unprecedented political crisis that washed through Israel shortly after the proclamation of the government's intentions to initiate reform. Results indicate that Leftists are more favorable toward AI in governance. While legitimacy is tied to support for using AI in governance among both, Rightists' acceptance is also tied to perceived norms, whereas Leftists' approval is linked to perceived utility, political efficacy, and warmth. Understanding these ideological differences is crucial, both theoretically and for practical policy formulation regarding AI's integration into governance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Designing for adaptation: Static and dynamic robustness in policy-making
    Howlett, Michael
    Ramesh, M.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 101 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [42] SNAP EXCLUSIONS AND THE ROLE OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN POLICY-MAKING
    Hutler, Brian
    Barnhill, Anne
    SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY, 2021, 38 (01) : 266 - 288
  • [43] Interactive policy-making - a model of management for public works
    Driessen, PPJ
    Glasbergen, P
    Verdaas, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 128 (02) : 322 - 337
  • [44] Policy-making for Indigenous entrepreneurship: towards an inclusive approach
    Olumekor, Michael
    Khan, Mohammad Saud
    Oppioli, Michele
    Calandra, Davide
    Polbitsyn, Sergey N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT, 2024, 45 (03): : 447 - 474
  • [45] Coalition bargaining time and governments' policy-making productivity
    Back, Hanna
    Bergman, Matthew
    Mueller, Wolfgang C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 63 (04) : 1263 - 1285
  • [46] Translating health information into policy-making: A pragmatic framework
    Funk, Tjede
    Sharma, Tarang
    Chapman, Evelina
    Kuchenmuller, Tanja
    HEALTH POLICY, 2022, 126 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [47] DOES HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AFFECT POLICY-MAKING AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN SWEDEN?
    Rosen, Mans
    Werko, Sophie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 30 (03) : 265 - 272
  • [48] Using economic analysis in health workforce policy-making
    Araujo, Edson C.
    Evans, Timothy Grant
    Maeda, Akiko
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 32 (01) : 41 - 63
  • [49] Appropriate policy-making for rural regions management in Iran
    Afsharipour, Ali
    Barghi, Hamid
    Ghanbari, Yosef
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 109
  • [50] The Language of Resilience: Ideas and Action in Contemporary Policy-making
    Jacobs, Keith
    Malpas, Jeff
    HOUSING THEORY & SOCIETY, 2018, 35 (04) : 394 - 409