Economic Evaluation of a Novel Lung Cancer Diagnostic in a Population of Patients With a Positive Low-Dose Computed Tomography Result

被引:0
|
作者
Morris, Michael J. [1 ]
Habib, Sheila A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Do Valle, Maggie L. [5 ]
Schneider, John E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Brooke Army Med Ctr, Ft Sam Houston, TX USA
[2] South Texas Vet Hlth Care Syst, Audie L Murphy Mem Vet Hosp, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] UT Hlth San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] UT Hlth Long Sch Med, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Avalon Hlth Econ, Coral Gables, FL 33134 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH | 2024年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
cost-offset analysis; cost saving; economic evaluation; lung cancer diagnostic; lung cancer; indeterminate pulmonary nodules; PULMONARY NODULES; BIOPSY; COMPLICATIONS; MORTALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.36469/jheor.2024.121512
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Early detection of lung cancer is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Although advancesin diagnostic technologies have significantly enhanced the ability to identify lung cancer in earlier stages, there are still limitations. The alarming rate of false positives has resulted in unnecessary utilization of medical resources and increased risk of adverse events from invasive procedures. Consequently, there is a critical need for advanced diagnostics after an initial low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan. Objectives: This study evaluated the potential cost savings for US payers of CyPath degrees Lung, a novel diagnostic tool utilizing flow cytometry and machine learning for the early detection of lung cancer, in patients with positive LDCT scans with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) ranging from 6 to 29 mm. Methods: A cost offset model was developed to evaluate the net expected savings associated with the use of CyPath degrees Lung relative to the current standard of care for individuals whose IPNs range from 6 to 29 mm. Perspectives from both Medicare and private payers in a US setting are included, with a 1-year time horizon. Cost calculations included procedure expenses, complication costs, and diagnostic assessment costs per patient. Primary outcomes of this analysis include cost savings per cohort and cost savings per patient. Results: Our analysis showed positive cost savings from a private payer's perspective, with expected savings of $895 202 311 per cohort and $6460 per patient, across all patients. Scenario analysis resulted in cost savings of $890 829 889 per cohort, and $6429 per patient. Similarly, savings of $378 689 020 per cohort or $2733 per patient were yielded for Medicare payers, across all patients. In addition, scenario analysis accounting for false negative patients from a Medicare payer perspective yielded savings of $376 902 203 per cohort and $2720 per patient. Discussion: The results suggest substantial cost savings, primarily due to reductions in follow-up diagnostic assessments and procedures, and highlight the importance of accurate diagnostic tools in reducing unnecessary healthcare expenditures. Conclusion: CyPath degrees Lung utilization yields savings for private and Medicare payers relative to the current standard of care in a US setting for individuals with 6 to 20 mm IPNs.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 79
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening: The (Other) Lung Cancer Revolution
    Horst, C.
    Callister, M. E. J.
    Janes, S. M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 31 (10) : 697 - 701
  • [32] Lung cancer screening: Early diagnosis with low-dose computed tomography
    Ladage D.
    Delorme S.
    best practice onkologie, 2022, 17 (1-2) : 32 - 41
  • [33] Supplementary data for a model-based health economic evaluation on lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in a high-risk population
    Du, Yihui
    Sidorenkov, Grigory
    Heuvelmans, Marjolein A.
    Groen, Harry J. M.
    Vermeulen, Karin M.
    Greuter, Marcel J. W.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 31
  • [34] Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography
    Sadate, Alexandre
    Occean, Bob V.
    Beregi, Jean-Paul
    Hamard, Aymeric
    Addala, Takieddine
    de Forges, Helene
    Fabbro-Peray, Pascale
    Frandon, Julien
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 134 : 107 - 114
  • [35] Variation in Model-Based Economic Evaluations of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A Methodological Review
    Peters, Jaime L.
    Snowsill, Tristan M.
    Griffin, Edward
    Robinson, Sophie
    Hyde, Chris J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (04) : 656 - 665
  • [36] Does the evidence support the implementation of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography?
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 12 (04) : 257 - 260
  • [37] Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening for Lung Cancer
    Christensen, Jared D.
    Chiles, Caroline
    CLINICS IN CHEST MEDICINE, 2015, 36 (02) : 147 - +
  • [38] Screening rate and influential factors of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography in Asian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Jinxin
    Yue, Na
    Wu, Jingwei
    Shi, Naiyang
    Wang, Qiang
    Cui, Tingting
    Zheng, Mengyun
    Sun, Siqing
    Jin, Hui
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 44 (02) : 246 - 254
  • [39] What is the balance of benefits and harms for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography?
    Bradley, Stephen H.
    Shinkins, Bethany
    Kennedy, Martyn P. T.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2021, 114 (04) : 164 - 170
  • [40] Benefit-to-radiation-risk of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening
    Hendrick, R. Edward
    Smith, Robert A.
    CANCER, 2024, 130 (02) : 216 - 223