Economic Evaluation of a Novel Lung Cancer Diagnostic in a Population of Patients With a Positive Low-Dose Computed Tomography Result

被引:0
|
作者
Morris, Michael J. [1 ]
Habib, Sheila A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Do Valle, Maggie L. [5 ]
Schneider, John E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Brooke Army Med Ctr, Ft Sam Houston, TX USA
[2] South Texas Vet Hlth Care Syst, Audie L Murphy Mem Vet Hosp, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] UT Hlth San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] UT Hlth Long Sch Med, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Avalon Hlth Econ, Coral Gables, FL 33134 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH | 2024年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
cost-offset analysis; cost saving; economic evaluation; lung cancer diagnostic; lung cancer; indeterminate pulmonary nodules; PULMONARY NODULES; BIOPSY; COMPLICATIONS; MORTALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.36469/jheor.2024.121512
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Early detection of lung cancer is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Although advancesin diagnostic technologies have significantly enhanced the ability to identify lung cancer in earlier stages, there are still limitations. The alarming rate of false positives has resulted in unnecessary utilization of medical resources and increased risk of adverse events from invasive procedures. Consequently, there is a critical need for advanced diagnostics after an initial low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan. Objectives: This study evaluated the potential cost savings for US payers of CyPath degrees Lung, a novel diagnostic tool utilizing flow cytometry and machine learning for the early detection of lung cancer, in patients with positive LDCT scans with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) ranging from 6 to 29 mm. Methods: A cost offset model was developed to evaluate the net expected savings associated with the use of CyPath degrees Lung relative to the current standard of care for individuals whose IPNs range from 6 to 29 mm. Perspectives from both Medicare and private payers in a US setting are included, with a 1-year time horizon. Cost calculations included procedure expenses, complication costs, and diagnostic assessment costs per patient. Primary outcomes of this analysis include cost savings per cohort and cost savings per patient. Results: Our analysis showed positive cost savings from a private payer's perspective, with expected savings of $895 202 311 per cohort and $6460 per patient, across all patients. Scenario analysis resulted in cost savings of $890 829 889 per cohort, and $6429 per patient. Similarly, savings of $378 689 020 per cohort or $2733 per patient were yielded for Medicare payers, across all patients. In addition, scenario analysis accounting for false negative patients from a Medicare payer perspective yielded savings of $376 902 203 per cohort and $2720 per patient. Discussion: The results suggest substantial cost savings, primarily due to reductions in follow-up diagnostic assessments and procedures, and highlight the importance of accurate diagnostic tools in reducing unnecessary healthcare expenditures. Conclusion: CyPath degrees Lung utilization yields savings for private and Medicare payers relative to the current standard of care in a US setting for individuals with 6 to 20 mm IPNs.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 79
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lung-Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Gould, Michael K.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (19) : 1813 - 1820
  • [22] Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Lei, Fang
    Lee, Eunice
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2019, 46 (02) : E60 - E71
  • [23] Lung cancer screening by low-dose spiral computed tomography
    van Klaveren, RJ
    Habbema, JDF
    Pedersen, JH
    de Koning, HJ
    Oudkerk, M
    Hoogsteden, HC
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (05) : 857 - 866
  • [24] Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer
    Patz, Edward F., Jr.
    Pinsky, Paul
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Sicks, JoRean D.
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Tammemaegi, Martin C.
    Chiles, Caroline
    Black, William C.
    Aberle, Denise R.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (02) : 269 - 274
  • [25] Evaluation of a Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Program in Henan, China
    Guo, Lan-Wei
    Chen, Qiong
    Shen, Yin-Chen
    Meng, Qing-Cheng
    Zheng, Li-Yang
    Wu, Yue
    Cao, Xiao-Qin
    Xu, Hui-Fang
    Liu, Shu-Zheng
    Sun, Xi-Bin
    Qiao, You-Lin
    Zhang, Shao-Kai
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (11) : E2019039
  • [26] Recommendations for Implementing Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Europe
    Veronesi, Giulia
    Baldwin, David R.
    Henschke, Claudia I.
    Ghislandi, Simone
    Iavicoli, Sergio
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    De Koning, Harry J.
    Shemesh, Joseph
    Field, John K.
    Zulueta, Javier J.
    Horgan, Denis
    Fiestas Navarrete, Lucia
    Infante, Maurizio Valentino
    Novellis, Pierluigi
    Murray, Rachael L.
    Peled, Nir
    Rampinelli, Cristiano
    Rocco, Gaetano
    Rzyman, Witold
    Scagliotti, Giorgio Vittorio
    Tammemagi, Martin C.
    Bertolaccini, Luca
    Triphuridet, Natthaya
    Yip, Rowena
    Rossi, Alexia
    Senan, Suresh
    Ferrante, Giuseppe
    Brain, Kate
    van der Aalst, Carlijn
    Bonomo, Lorenzo
    Consonni, Dario
    Van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Novello, Silvia
    Devaraj, Anand
    Saghir, Zaigham
    Pelosi, Giuseppe
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06) : 1 - 24
  • [27] Lung Cancer Screening With Low-dose Computed Tomography An Analysis of the MEDCAC Decision
    Parker, Mark S.
    Groves, Robert C.
    Fowler, Alpha A., III
    Shepherd, Ray W.
    Cassano, Anthony D.
    Cafaro, Patricia L.
    Chestnut, Geoffrey T.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2015, 30 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [28] Effectiveness of a single low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A population-based perspective cohort study in China
    Yu, Zhifu
    Ni, Ping
    Yu, Huihui
    Zuo, Tingting
    Liu, Yunyong
    Wang, Danbo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 154 (04) : 659 - 669
  • [29] The impact of patients' preferences on the decision of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening
    Wu, Fu-Zong
    Kuo, Pei-Lun
    Wu, Carol C.
    Wu, Ming-Ting
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 : S236 - S238
  • [30] Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography is not a Question of Logistics
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    Provencio-Pulla, Mariano
    Casan Clara, Pere
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2017, 53 (10): : 593 - 594