Active learning aims to reduce the high labeling cost involved in training machine learning models on large datasets by efficiently labeling only the most informative samples. Recently, deep active learning has shown success on various tasks. However, the conventional evaluation schemes are either incomplete or below par. This study critically assesses various active learning approaches, identifying key factors essential for choosing the most effective active learning method. It includes a comprehensive guide to obtain the best performance for each case, in image classification and semantic segmentation. For image classification, the AL methods improve by a large-margin when integrated with data augmentation and semi-supervised learning, but barely perform better than the random baseline. In this work, we evaluate them under more realistic settings and propose a more suitable evaluation protocol. For semantic segmentation, previous academic studies focused on diverse datasets with substantial annotation resources. In contrast, data collected in many driving scenarios is highly redundant, and most medical applications are subject to very constrained annotation budgets. The study evaluates active learning techniques under various conditions including data redundancy, the use of semi-supervised learning, and differing annotation budgets. As an outcome of our study, we provide a comprehensive usage guide to obtain the best performance for each case.