Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force

被引:0
|
作者
Botwright, Siobhan [1 ,2 ]
Sittimart, Manit [1 ]
Chavarina, Kinanti Khansa [1 ]
Bayani, Diana Beatriz [3 ]
Merlin, Tracy [4 ]
Surgey, Gavin [5 ]
Suharlim, Christian [6 ]
Espinoza, Manuel A. [7 ]
Culyer, Anthony J. [8 ]
Oortwijn, Wija [5 ]
Teerawattananon, Yot [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Publ Hlth, Hlth Intervent & Technol Assessment Program HITAP, Nonthaburi, Thailand
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Hlth Technol Assessment AHTA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Management Sci Hlth, Medford, MA USA
[7] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Santiago, Chile
[8] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, England
关键词
evidence-informed priority setting; good practices; guidelines; HTA; BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; RECOMMENDATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; CONFLICTS; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines are intended to support successful implementation of HTA by enhancing consistency and transparency in concepts, methods, process, and use, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the decision-making process. This report lays out good practices and practical recommendations for developing or updating HTA guidelines to ensure successful implementation. Methods: The task force was established in 2022 and comprised experts and academics from various geographical regions, each with substantial experience in developing HTA guidelines for national health policymaking. Literature reviews and key-informant interviews were conducted to inform these good practices. Stakeholder consultations, open peer reviews, and expert opinions validated the recommendations. A series of teleconferences among task force members was held to iteratively refine the report. Results: The recommendations cover 6 key aspects throughout the guideline development cycle: (1) setting objectives, scope, and principles of the guideline, (2) building a team for a quality guideline, (3) defining a stakeholder engagement plan, (iv) developing content and utilizing available resources, (v) putting in place appropriate institutional arrangements, and (vi) monitoring and evaluating guideline success. Conclusion: This report presents a set of resources and context-appropriate practices for developing or updating HTA guidelines. Across all contexts, the recommendations emphasize transparency, building trust among stakeholders, and fostering a culture of ongoing learning and improvement. The report recommends timing development and revision of guidelines according to the HTA landscape and pace of HTA institutionalization. Because HTA is increasingly used to inform different kinds of decision making in a variety of country contexts, it will be important to continue to monitor lessons learned to ensure the recommendations remain relevant and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identification, Review, and Use of Health State Utilities in Cost-Effectiveness Models: An ISPOR Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force Report
    Brazier, John
    Ara, Roberta
    Azzabi, Ismail
    Busschbach, Jan
    Chevrou-Severac, Helene
    Crawford, Bruce
    Cruz, Luciane
    Karnon, John
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Paisley, Suzy
    Pickard, A. Simon
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (03) : 267 - 275
  • [32] Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research-An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Crown, William
    Buyukkaramikli, Nasuh
    Thokala, Praveen
    Morton, Alec
    Sir, Mustafa Y.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Tosh, Jon
    Padula, William V.
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Wong, Peter K.
    Pasupathy, Kalyan S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (03) : 310 - 319
  • [33] The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report
    McGhan, William F.
    Al, Maiwenn
    Doshi, Jalpa A.
    Kamae, Isao
    Marx, Steven E.
    Rindress, Donna
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (08) : 1086 - 1099
  • [35] Development of the Indian Reference Case for undertaking economic evaluation for health technology assessment
    Sharma, Deepshikha
    Prinja, Shankar
    Aggarwal, Arun K.
    Rajsekar, Kavitha
    Bahuguna, Pankaj
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - SOUTHEAST ASIA, 2023, 16
  • [36] Recommendations for the Conduct and Reporting of Modeling and Simulation Studies in Health Technology Assessment
    Dahabreh, Issa J.
    Trikalinos, Thomas A.
    Balk, Ethan M.
    Wong, John B.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (08) : 575 - +
  • [37] Health Technology Assessment in Osteoporosis
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    Kanis, John A.
    Compston, Juliet
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Flamion, Bruno
    Bergmann, Pierre
    Body, Jean-Jacques
    Boonen, Steven
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Devogelaer, Jean-Pierre
    Goemaere, Stefan
    Kaufman, Jean-Marc
    Rozenberg, Serge
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 93 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [38] Health Technology Assessment in the UK
    Raftery, James
    Powell, John
    LANCET, 2013, 382 (9900) : 1278 - 1285
  • [39] Health Technology Assessment in Osteoporosis
    Mickael Hiligsmann
    John A. Kanis
    Juliet Compston
    Cyrus Cooper
    Bruno Flamion
    Pierre Bergmann
    Jean-Jacques Body
    Steven Boonen
    Olivier Bruyere
    Jean-Pierre Devogelaer
    Stefan Goemaere
    Jean-Marc Kaufman
    Serge Rozenberg
    Jean-Yves Reginster
    Calcified Tissue International, 2013, 93 : 1 - 14
  • [40] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN SERBIA
    Atanasijevic, Dragana
    Zah, Vladimir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 33 (03) : 384 - 389