Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force

被引:0
|
作者
Botwright, Siobhan [1 ,2 ]
Sittimart, Manit [1 ]
Chavarina, Kinanti Khansa [1 ]
Bayani, Diana Beatriz [3 ]
Merlin, Tracy [4 ]
Surgey, Gavin [5 ]
Suharlim, Christian [6 ]
Espinoza, Manuel A. [7 ]
Culyer, Anthony J. [8 ]
Oortwijn, Wija [5 ]
Teerawattananon, Yot [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Publ Hlth, Hlth Intervent & Technol Assessment Program HITAP, Nonthaburi, Thailand
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Hlth Technol Assessment AHTA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Management Sci Hlth, Medford, MA USA
[7] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Santiago, Chile
[8] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, England
关键词
evidence-informed priority setting; good practices; guidelines; HTA; BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; RECOMMENDATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; CONFLICTS; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines are intended to support successful implementation of HTA by enhancing consistency and transparency in concepts, methods, process, and use, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the decision-making process. This report lays out good practices and practical recommendations for developing or updating HTA guidelines to ensure successful implementation. Methods: The task force was established in 2022 and comprised experts and academics from various geographical regions, each with substantial experience in developing HTA guidelines for national health policymaking. Literature reviews and key-informant interviews were conducted to inform these good practices. Stakeholder consultations, open peer reviews, and expert opinions validated the recommendations. A series of teleconferences among task force members was held to iteratively refine the report. Results: The recommendations cover 6 key aspects throughout the guideline development cycle: (1) setting objectives, scope, and principles of the guideline, (2) building a team for a quality guideline, (3) defining a stakeholder engagement plan, (iv) developing content and utilizing available resources, (v) putting in place appropriate institutional arrangements, and (vi) monitoring and evaluating guideline success. Conclusion: This report presents a set of resources and context-appropriate practices for developing or updating HTA guidelines. Across all contexts, the recommendations emphasize transparency, building trust among stakeholders, and fostering a culture of ongoing learning and improvement. The report recommends timing development and revision of guidelines according to the HTA landscape and pace of HTA institutionalization. Because HTA is increasingly used to inform different kinds of decision making in a variety of country contexts, it will be important to continue to monitor lessons learned to ensure the recommendations remain relevant and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility of Modeling Studies for Informing Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report
    Caro, J. Jaime
    Eddy, David M.
    Kan, Hong
    Kaltz, Cheryl
    Patel, Bimal
    Eldessouki, Randa
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (02) : 174 - 182
  • [22] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making-Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Marsh, Kevin
    IJzerman, Maarten
    Thokala, Praveen
    Baltussen, Rob
    Boysen, Meindert
    Kalo, Zoltan
    Lonngren, Thomas
    Mussen, Filip
    Peacock, Stuart
    Watkins, John
    Devlin, Nancy
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [23] GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR GOOD PRACTICES IN HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT UNITS
    Sampietro-Colom, Laura
    Lach, Krzysztof
    Pasternack, Iris
    Wasserfallen, Jean-Blaise
    Cicchetti, Americo
    Marchetti, Marco
    Kidholm, Kristian
    Arentz-Hansen, Helene
    Rosenmoeller, Magdalene
    Wild, Claudia
    Kahveci, Rabia
    Ulst, Margus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 31 (06) : 457 - 465
  • [24] A Roadmap for Increasing the Usefulness and Impact of Patient-Preference Studies in Decision Making in Health: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Hauber, Brett
    Heidenreich, Sebastian
    Janssen, Ellen
    Bast, Alice
    Hanmer, Janel
    Danyliv, Andriy
    Low, Eric
    Bouvy, Jacoline C.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (02) : 153 - 162
  • [25] Prospective Observational Studies to Assess Comparative Effectiveness: The ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report
    Berger, Marc L.
    Dreyer, Nancy
    Anderson, Fred
    Towse, Adrian
    Sedrakyan, Art
    Normand, Sharon-Lise
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (02) : 217 - 230
  • [26] Application of Constrained Optimization Methods in Health Services Research: Report 2 of the ISPOR Optimization Methods Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Crown, William
    Buyukkaramikli, Nasuh
    Sir, Mustafa Y.
    Thokala, Praveen
    Morton, Alec
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Tosh, Jonathan C.
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Padula, William V.
    Pasupathy, Kalyan S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 (09) : 1019 - 1028
  • [27] Expectations for the Development of Health Technology Assessment in Brazil
    Simoes Correa Galendi, Julia
    Caramori, Carlos Antonio
    Lemmen, Clarissa
    Mueller, Dirk
    Stock, Stephanie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (22)
  • [28] Historical development of health technology assessment in Thailand
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    Tantivess, Sripen
    Yothasamut, Jomkwan
    Kingkaew, Pritaporn
    Chaisiri, Kakanang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 : 241 - 252
  • [29] Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: Report of the ISPOR task force on good research practices - budget impact analysis
    Mauskopf, Josephine A.
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    Annemans, Lieven
    Caro, Jaime
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Nuijten, Mark
    Orlewska, Ewa
    Watkins, John
    Trueman, Paul
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (05) : 336 - 347
  • [30] Clinical Outcome Assessments: Conceptual Foundation-Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment - Emerging Good Practices for Outcomes Research Task Force
    Walton, Marc K.
    Powers, Johnh. H., III
    Hobart, Jeremy
    Patrick, Donald
    Marquis, Patrick
    Vamvakas, Spiros
    Isaac, Maria
    Molsen, Elizabeth
    Cano, Stefan
    Burke, Laurie B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (06) : 741 - 752