Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force

被引:0
|
作者
Botwright, Siobhan [1 ,2 ]
Sittimart, Manit [1 ]
Chavarina, Kinanti Khansa [1 ]
Bayani, Diana Beatriz [3 ]
Merlin, Tracy [4 ]
Surgey, Gavin [5 ]
Suharlim, Christian [6 ]
Espinoza, Manuel A. [7 ]
Culyer, Anthony J. [8 ]
Oortwijn, Wija [5 ]
Teerawattananon, Yot [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Publ Hlth, Hlth Intervent & Technol Assessment Program HITAP, Nonthaburi, Thailand
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Hlth Technol Assessment AHTA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Management Sci Hlth, Medford, MA USA
[7] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Santiago, Chile
[8] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, England
关键词
evidence-informed priority setting; good practices; guidelines; HTA; BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; RECOMMENDATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; CONFLICTS; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines are intended to support successful implementation of HTA by enhancing consistency and transparency in concepts, methods, process, and use, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the decision-making process. This report lays out good practices and practical recommendations for developing or updating HTA guidelines to ensure successful implementation. Methods: The task force was established in 2022 and comprised experts and academics from various geographical regions, each with substantial experience in developing HTA guidelines for national health policymaking. Literature reviews and key-informant interviews were conducted to inform these good practices. Stakeholder consultations, open peer reviews, and expert opinions validated the recommendations. A series of teleconferences among task force members was held to iteratively refine the report. Results: The recommendations cover 6 key aspects throughout the guideline development cycle: (1) setting objectives, scope, and principles of the guideline, (2) building a team for a quality guideline, (3) defining a stakeholder engagement plan, (iv) developing content and utilizing available resources, (v) putting in place appropriate institutional arrangements, and (vi) monitoring and evaluating guideline success. Conclusion: This report presents a set of resources and context-appropriate practices for developing or updating HTA guidelines. Across all contexts, the recommendations emphasize transparency, building trust among stakeholders, and fostering a culture of ongoing learning and improvement. The report recommends timing development and revision of guidelines according to the HTA landscape and pace of HTA institutionalization. Because HTA is increasingly used to inform different kinds of decision making in a variety of country contexts, it will be important to continue to monitor lessons learned to ensure the recommendations remain relevant and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force
    Botwright, Siobhan
    Sittimart, Manit
    Chavarina, Kinanti Khansa
    Bayani, Diana Beatriz Samson
    Merlin, Tracy
    Surgey, Gavin
    Suharlim, Christian
    Espinoza, Manuel A.
    Culyer, Anthony J.
    Oortwijn, Wija
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2025, 40 (01)
  • [2] Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force
    Oortwijn, Wija
    Husereau, Don
    Abelson, Julia
    Barasa, Edwine
    Bayani, Diana
    Santos, Vania Canuto
    Culyer, Anthony
    Facey, Karen
    Grainger, David
    Kieslich, Katharina
    Ollendorf, Daniel
    Pichon-Riviere, Andres
    Sandman, Lars
    Strammiello, Valentina
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (06) : 869 - 886
  • [3] Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment: A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force
    Oortwijn, Wija
    Husereau, Don
    Abelson, Julia
    Barasa, Edwine
    Bayani, Diana Dana
    Santos, Vania Canuto
    Culyer, Anthony
    Facey, Karen
    Grainger, David
    Kieslich, Katharina
    Ollendorf, Daniel
    Pichon-Riviere, Andres
    Sandman, Lars
    Strammiello, Valentina
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 38 (01)
  • [4] Identifying the Need for Good Practices in Health Technology Assessment: Summary of the ISPOR HTA Council Working Group Report on Good Practices in HTA
    Kristensen, Finn Borlum
    Husereau, Don
    Huic, Mirjana
    Drummond, Michael
    Berger, Marc L.
    Bond, Kenneth
    Augustovski, Federico
    Booth, Andrew
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    IJzerman, Maarten J.
    Jonsson, Egon
    Ollendorf, Daniel A.
    Ruether, Alric
    Siebert, Uwe
    Sharma, Jitendar
    Wailoo, Allan
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [5] Criteria and Process for Initiating and Developing an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report
    Malone, Daniel C.
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Roberts, Mark S.
    Willke, Richard J.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (04) : 409 - 415
  • [6] Mapping Health Technology Assessment Agency Approaches for Biosimilar Value Assessment: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report
    Lacosta, Teresa Barcina
    Inotai, Andras
    Pereira, Catarina Lopes
    Barbier, Liese
    Simoens, Steven
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (05) : 543 - 551
  • [7] Challenges of Health Technology Assessment in Pluralistic Healthcare Systems: An ISPOR Council Report
    Drummond, Michael F.
    Augustovski, Federico
    Bhattacharyya, Devarshi
    Campbell, Jonathan
    Chaiyakanapruk, Nathorn
    Chen, Yingyao
    Galindo-Suarez, Rosa Maria
    Guerino, John
    Mejia, Aurelio
    Mujoomdar, Michelle
    Ollendorf, Daniel
    Ronquest, Naoko
    Torbica, Aleksandra
    Tsiao, Emily
    Watkins, John
    Yeung, Kai
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (08) : 1257 - 1267
  • [8] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [9] The Beneluxa Initiative domain task force health technology assessment: a comparison of member countries' past health technology assessments
    Vreman, Rick A.
    van Hoof, Daan
    Nachtnebel, Anna
    Daems, Joel
    van de Casteele, Marc
    Fogarty, Emer
    Adams, Roisin
    Timmers, Lonneke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [10] Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force
    Husereau, Don
    Drummond, Michael
    Augustovski, Federico
    De Bekker-Grob, Esther
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Carswell, Chris
    Caulley, Lisa
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    Greenberg, Dan
    Loder, Elizabeth
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    Mullins, C. Daniel
    Petrou, Stavros
    Pwu, Raoh-Fang
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : 10 - 31