A Comparison of Systematic, Targeted, and Combined Biopsy Using Machine Learning for Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk: A Multi-Center Study

被引:0
|
作者
Arafa, Mostafa A. [1 ,2 ]
Omar, Islam [3 ]
Farhat, Karim H. [1 ]
Elshinawy, Mona [4 ]
Khan, Farrukh [5 ]
Alkhathami, Faisal A. [5 ]
Mokhtar, Alaa [6 ]
Althunayan, Abdulaziz [1 ,5 ]
Rabah, Danny M. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Badawy, Abdel-Hameed A. [3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Canc Res Chair, Surg Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Alexandria Univ, High Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] New Mexico State Univ, Klipsch Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Las Cruces, NM USA
[4] New Mexico State Univ, Engn Technol & Surveying Engn Dept, Las Cruces, NM USA
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Machine learning; Prostate cancer risk; Systematic biopsy; Targeted biopsy; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1159/000540425
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aims of the study were to construct a new prognostic prediction model for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) patients using machine-learning (ML) techniques and to compare those models across systematic and target biopsy detection techniques. Methods: The records of the two main hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were analyzed for data on diagnosed PCa from 2019 to 2023. Four ML algorithms were utilized for the prediction and classification of PCa. Results: A total of 528 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 3.5 ng/mL who had undergone transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy were evaluated. The total number of confirmed PCa cases was 234. Age, prostate volume, PSA, body mass index (BMI), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) score, number of regions of interest detected in MRI, and the diameter of the largest size lesion were significantly associated with PCa. Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB) (ML algorithms) accurately predicted PCa. Yet, their performance for classification and prediction of PCa was higher and more accurate for cases detected by targeted and combined biopsy (systematic and targeted together) compared to systematic biopsy alone. F1, the area under the curve (AUC), and the accuracy of XGB and RF models for targeted biopsy and combined biopsy ranged from 0.94 to 0.97 compared to the AUC of systematic biopsy for RF and XGB algorithms, respectively. Conclusions: The RF model generated and presented an excellent prediction capability for the risk of PCa detected by targeted and combined biopsy compared to systematic biopsy alone. ML models can prevent missed PCa diagnoses by serving as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 500
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Necessity Using PSA, MRI, and Hematologic Parameters
    Sungur, Mustafa
    Aykac, Aykut
    Aydin, Mehmet Erhan
    Celik, Ozer
    Kaya, Coskun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [42] Comparison of machine learning models based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound videos for the prediction of prostate cancer
    Qi, Xiaoyang
    Wang, Kai
    Feng, Bojian
    Sun, Xingbo
    Yang, Jie
    Hu, Zhengbiao
    Zhang, Maoliang
    Lv, Cheng
    Jin, Liyuan
    Zhou, Lingyan
    Wang, Zhengping
    Yao, Jincao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [43] Machine-learning Algorithm-based Risk Prediction and Screening-detected Prostate Cancer in A Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Cohort
    Chang, Chia-Cheng
    Chiou, Jiun-Kai
    Lin, Cheng-Jian
    Lu, Kevin
    Li, Jian-Ri
    Chang, Li-Wen
    Hung, Sheng-Chun
    Cheng, Chen-Li
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 44 (04) : 1683 - 1693
  • [44] Machine Learning-Based Objective Evaluation Model of CTPA Image Quality: A Multi-Center Study
    Sun, Qihang
    Liu, Zhongxiao
    Ding, Tao
    Shi, Changzhou
    Hou, Nailong
    Sun, Cunjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2025, 18 : 997 - 1005
  • [45] Work Disability Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning, Comparison of Two Methods
    Saarela, Katja
    Huhta-Koivisto, Vili
    Nurminen, Jukka K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN COMPUTING RESEARCH (ICR'22), 2022, 1431 : 13 - 21
  • [46] Predicting High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Machine Learning Methods
    Barlow, Henry
    Mao, Shunqi
    Khushi, Matloob
    DATA, 2019, 4 (03)
  • [47] Comparison of Regional Saturation Biopsy, Targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Levels of 4-20 ng/ml: A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jiang, Xingkang
    Chen, Mingzhe
    Tian, Jing
    Li, Xiaohua
    Liu, Ranlu
    Wang, Yong
    Zhao, Yang
    Peng, Shuanghe
    Niu, Yuanjie
    Xu, Yong
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (04): : 944 - 953
  • [48] The accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive patients using combined magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy
    Uno, Hiromi
    Taniguchi, Tomoki
    Seike, Kensaku
    Kato, Daiki
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Horie, Kengo
    Nakane, Keita
    Koie, Takuya
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (07) : 2982 - 2989
  • [49] Prediction of Cervical Cancer from Behavior Risk Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Akter L.
    Ferdib-Al-Islam
    Islam M.M.
    Al-Rakhami M.S.
    Haque M.R.
    SN Computer Science, 2021, 2 (3)
  • [50] Combined systematic versus stand-alone multiparametric MRI-guided targeted fusion biopsy: nomogram prediction of non-organ-confined prostate cancer
    Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah
    Mykyta Kachanov
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    Dirk Beyersdorff
    Raisa S. Pompe
    Su Jung Oh-Hohenhorst
    Margit Fisch
    Tobias Maurer
    Markus Graefen
    Lars Budäus
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 81 - 88