A Comparison of Systematic, Targeted, and Combined Biopsy Using Machine Learning for Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk: A Multi-Center Study

被引:0
|
作者
Arafa, Mostafa A. [1 ,2 ]
Omar, Islam [3 ]
Farhat, Karim H. [1 ]
Elshinawy, Mona [4 ]
Khan, Farrukh [5 ]
Alkhathami, Faisal A. [5 ]
Mokhtar, Alaa [6 ]
Althunayan, Abdulaziz [1 ,5 ]
Rabah, Danny M. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Badawy, Abdel-Hameed A. [3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Canc Res Chair, Surg Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Alexandria Univ, High Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] New Mexico State Univ, Klipsch Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Las Cruces, NM USA
[4] New Mexico State Univ, Engn Technol & Surveying Engn Dept, Las Cruces, NM USA
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[6] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Machine learning; Prostate cancer risk; Systematic biopsy; Targeted biopsy; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1159/000540425
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aims of the study were to construct a new prognostic prediction model for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) patients using machine-learning (ML) techniques and to compare those models across systematic and target biopsy detection techniques. Methods: The records of the two main hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were analyzed for data on diagnosed PCa from 2019 to 2023. Four ML algorithms were utilized for the prediction and classification of PCa. Results: A total of 528 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) greater than 3.5 ng/mL who had undergone transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy were evaluated. The total number of confirmed PCa cases was 234. Age, prostate volume, PSA, body mass index (BMI), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) score, number of regions of interest detected in MRI, and the diameter of the largest size lesion were significantly associated with PCa. Random Forest (RF) and XGBoost (XGB) (ML algorithms) accurately predicted PCa. Yet, their performance for classification and prediction of PCa was higher and more accurate for cases detected by targeted and combined biopsy (systematic and targeted together) compared to systematic biopsy alone. F1, the area under the curve (AUC), and the accuracy of XGB and RF models for targeted biopsy and combined biopsy ranged from 0.94 to 0.97 compared to the AUC of systematic biopsy for RF and XGB algorithms, respectively. Conclusions: The RF model generated and presented an excellent prediction capability for the risk of PCa detected by targeted and combined biopsy compared to systematic biopsy alone. ML models can prevent missed PCa diagnoses by serving as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 500
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of updated imaging software on the performance of machine learning models for breast cancer diagnosis: a multi-center, retrospective study
    Cai, Lie
    Golatta, Michael
    Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
    Barr, Richard G.
    Pfob, Andre
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2025,
  • [32] Improving predictive performance in incident heart failure using machine learning and multi-center data
    Sabovcik, Frantisek
    Ntalianis, Evangelos
    Cauwenberghs, Nicholas
    Kuznetsova, Tatiana
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [33] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy and Pretherapeutic Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment: a Systematic Review
    Diamand, R.
    Mjaess, G.
    Ploussard, G.
    Fiard, G.
    Oderda, M.
    Lefebvre, Y.
    Sirtaine, N.
    Roumeguere, T.
    Peltier, A.
    Albisinni, S.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2022, 32 (06):
  • [34] Predictive model for abdominal liposuction volume in patients with obesity using machine learning in a longitudinal multi-center study in Korea
    Sang, Hyunji
    Park, Jaeyu
    Kim, Soeun
    Lee, Myeongcheol
    Lee, Hojae
    Lee, Sun-Ho
    Yon, Dong Keon
    Rhee, Sang Youl
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [35] Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning
    Stojadinovic, Miroslav
    Stojadinovic, Milorad
    Jankovic, Slobodan
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2025, : 1737 - 1746
  • [36] Comparison of MRI/US Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Systematic Biopsy in Biopsy-Naive Prostate Patients with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen: A Diagnostic Study
    Huang, Chen
    Huang, Yuhua
    Pu, Jinxian
    Xi, Qilin
    Wei, Xuedong
    Qiu, Feng
    Wang, Ximing
    Zhao, Xiaojun
    Guo, Linchuan
    Hou, Jianquan
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 14 : 1395 - 1407
  • [37] Machine learning-based prediction of infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A multi-center study
    Xin, A.
    Li, Kangshuo
    Yan, Lijing L.
    Chandramouli, Chanchal
    Hu, Rundong
    Jin, Xurui
    Li, Ping
    Chen, Mulei
    Qian, Geng
    Chen, Yundai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 375 : 131 - 141
  • [38] Machine and Deep Learning Prediction Of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using Multiparametric MRI
    Bertelli, Elena
    Mercatelli, Laura
    Marzi, Chiara
    Pachetti, Eva
    Baccini, Michela
    Barucci, Andrea
    Colantonio, Sara
    Gherardini, Luca
    Lattavo, Lorenzo
    Pascali, Maria Antonietta
    Agostini, Simone
    Miele, Vittorio
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [39] Development of prediction model to estimate future risk of ovarian lesions: A multi-center retrospective study
    Jing, Bilin
    Chen, Gaowen
    Yang, Miner
    Zhang, Zhi
    Zhang, Yue
    Zhang, Jingyao
    Xie, Juncheng
    Hou, Wenjie
    Xie, Yong
    Huang, Yi
    Zhao, Lijie
    Yuan, Hua
    Liao, Weilin
    Wang, Yifeng
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 35
  • [40] Machine learning for the prediction of prostate cancer biopsy based on 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantification
    Wildeboer, R. R.
    van Sloun, R. J. G.
    Huang, P.
    Wijkstra, H.
    Mischi, M.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2018,