Analyzing the Trade-Offs between Soil Health Enhancement, Carbon Sequestration, and Productivity in Central India's Black Soil through Conservation Agriculture

被引:0
|
作者
Kumbhar, Chetna [1 ]
Kharche, Vilas [1 ]
Ramteke, Pratik [1 ]
Jadhao, Shyam [1 ]
Bhoyar, Sanjay [1 ]
Konde, Nitin [1 ]
Mali, Dnyaneshwar [1 ]
Sonune, Bhagwan [1 ]
El-Hendawy, Salah [2 ]
Mattar, Mohamed A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Dr Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dept Soil Sci & Agr Chem, Akola 444104, India
[2] King Saud Univ, Dept Plant Prod, Coll Food & Agr Sci, POB 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr Sci, Dept Agr Engn, POB 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
关键词
conservation tillage; Vertisol; legume intercropping; soil properties; carbon pools; yield sustainability; INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT; ORGANIC-MATTER DYNAMICS; NO-TILL; CROP-ROTATION; SEMIARID ENVIRONMENT; CHEMICAL-PROPERTIES; RESIDUE MANAGEMENT; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; GANGETIC PLAINS; POULTRY LITTER;
D O I
10.3390/su16198319
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The impact of conservation tillage (CST) practices on soil properties, carbon sequestration and yield sustainability over short, medium, and long durations remain insufficiently understood, especially in semiarid Central India. Therefore, our objective was to investigate the effects and optimal duration of CST adoption for enhancing soil properties, carbon sequestration, and sustainable yields. We conducted a study in farmers' fields in the Akola district of Central India, where CST had been practised for 4 to 15 years, within a soybean + pigeon pea-chickpea cropping sequence. Our findings revealed significant (p < 0.05) improvements in soil physical properties with short-term CST practices (4 to 6 years), alongside increasing availability of nitrogen and phosphorus, with longer durations of CST implementation (10 to 15 years). The lowest soil organic carbon (SOC) was observed in conventional tillage (CT_y), while all CST practices increased SOC content over CT_y, ranging from 22.2 to 38.4%. Further, experimental soil dominated passive C pools (Cfrac3 + Cfrac4). Consequently, long-term CST practices facilitated positive C sequestration rates, contrasting with negative or minimal sequestration observed in CT_y and short-term CST treatments. However, compared to CST, CT_y demonstrated higher soybean equivalent yields and comparable chickpea equivalent yields mainly due to delayed germinations induced by lower soil temperatures in CST plots. We conclude that integrating site-specific characteristics, management practices, and regional climate conditions into conservation agriculture frameworks maximizes efficacy and ensures sustainable productivity. These findings help optimize agricultural practices considering potential yield losses or minimal changes despite implementing CST.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration: Between Myth and Farmer Reality
    Govaerts, B.
    Verhulst, N.
    Castellanos-Navarrete, A.
    Sayre, K. D.
    Dixon, J.
    Dendooven, L.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2009, 28 (03) : 97 - 122
  • [2] Trade-offs and synergies of soil carbon sequestration: Addressing knowledge gaps related to soil management strategies
    Maenhout, Peter
    Di Bene, Claudia
    Cayuela, Maria Luz
    Diaz-Pines, Eugenio
    Govednik, Anton
    Keuper, Frida
    Mavsar, Sara
    Mihelic, Rok
    O'Toole, Adam
    Schwarzmann, Ana
    Suhadolc, Marjetka
    Syp, Alina
    Valkama, Elena
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2024, 75 (03)
  • [3] Trade-offs between soil carbon sequestration and reactive nitrogen losses under straw return in global agroecosystems
    Xia, Longlong
    Lam, Shu Kee
    Wolf, Benjamin
    Kiese, Ralf
    Chen, Deli
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (12) : 5919 - 5932
  • [4] Sustaining the properties of black soil in Central India through crop residue management in a conservation-agriculture-based soybean-wheat system
    Yadav, Devideen
    Vishwakarma, Anand Kumar
    Sharma, Narinder Kumar
    Biswas, Ashis Kumar
    Ojasvi, Prabhat Ranjan
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Kumawat, Anita
    Singh, Deepak
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 32 (10) : 2906 - 2921
  • [5] Conservation agriculture enhances crop productivity and soil carbon fractions in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India
    Mishra, Ajay Kumar
    Shinjo, Hitoshi
    Jat, Hanuman Sahay
    Jat, Mangi Lal
    Jat, Raj Kumar
    Funakawa, Shinya
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [6] Conservation tillage and nutrient management effects on productivity and soil carbon sequestration under double cropping of rice in north eastern region of India
    Yadav, Gulab Singh
    Lal, Rattan
    Meena, Ram Swaroop
    Babu, Subhash
    Das, Anup
    Bhowmik, S. N.
    Datta, Mrinmoy
    Layak, Jayanta
    Saha, Poulami
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 105 : 303 - 315
  • [7] A "Win-Win" for Soil Conservation? How Indiana Row-Crop Farmers Perceive the Benefits (and Trade-offs) of No-Till Agriculture
    Kawa, Nicholas C.
    CULTURE AGRICULTURE FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 43 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [8] Improving soil health and crop productivity through conservation agriculture and nitrogen management in rice-mustard-maize systems
    Marahatta, Santosh
    Sah, Shrawan Kumar
    Mcdonald, Andrew
    Timsina, Jagadish
    Devkota, Krishna Prasad
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2025, 325
  • [9] Potato production through bio-resources: Long-term effects on tuber productivity, quality, carbon sequestration and soil health in temperate Himalayas
    Paul, Jai
    Choudhary, Anil K.
    Sharma, S.
    Savita
    Bohra, Mamta
    Dixit, A. K.
    Kumar, Pankaj
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2016, 213 : 152 - 163
  • [10] Potential of conservation tillage and altered land configuration to improve soil properties, carbon sequestration and productivity of maize based cropping system in eastern Himalayas, India
    Yadav, Gulab Singh
    Das, Anup
    Babu, Subhash
    Mohapatra, Kamal Prasad
    Lal, Rattan
    Rajkhowa, Dipjyoti
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (02) : 279 - 290