Mandible bone mineral density estimation using spectral panoramic X-ray imaging

被引:0
作者
Somerkivi, Villeseveri [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sellerer, Thorsten [1 ,2 ]
Berthe, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Haemisch, York [4 ]
Pantsar, Tuomas [4 ]
Lohman, Henrik [4 ]
Kaasalainen, Touko [5 ,6 ]
Pfeiffer, Franz [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Nat Sci, Dept Phys, James Franck Str 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Munich Inst Biomed Engn, Garching, Germany
[3] Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Varex Imaging Corp, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Helsinki, HUS Diag Ctr, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Diag & Intervent Radiol, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[8] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Adv Study, Garching, Germany
关键词
Radiography; Dual-Energy Scanned Projection; X-Rays; Bone Density; OSTEOPOROSIS; SKELETAL;
D O I
10.5624/isd.20240231
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining mandible bone mineral density (BMD) scores using spectral panoramic imaging. Materials and Methods: Areal BMD scores were measured from the body and angle of the mandible in 3 anthropomorphic head phantoms using a spectral panoramic system (Planmeca Promax Mid, Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) equipped with a DC-Vela detector (Varex Imaging Corporation, Salt Lake City, USA). These results were compared to synthetic panoramic images generated from dual-energy CT acquisitions. Reproducibility was evaluated by repeatedly scanning 1 phantom with minor patient positioning errors, and the linearity of the BMD scores was assessed using calcium inserts in a Gammex 472 phantom (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, USA). Results: The experimental and synthetic panoramic images appeared visually similar. The mean synthetic score was 0.640 g/cm2, and the anthropomorphic phantoms produced a root mean squared error of 0.0292 g/cm2 with a correlation coefficient of 0.969. Typical patient positioning errors did not substantially increase the error, which measured 0.0296 g/cm2 and 0.0474 g/cm2 for the left and right sides, respectively. Linearity tests using the Gammex phantom yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.998 for BMD scores ranging from 0.03 to 2.7 g/cm2. Conclusion: The BMD data obtained from spectral panoramic imaging are consistent with both dual-energy CT and Gammex phantom measurements. Consequently, spectral panoramic imaging shows potential as a method for osteoporosis screening, leveraging the widespread use of panoramic imaging. (Imaging Sci Dent 20240231)
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 64
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Relationship of bone mineral density with panoramic radiomorphometric indices in tobacco users in India
    Suman, B.
    Redhu, Anju
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE AND RADIOLOGY, 2020, 32 (02) : 119 - 126
  • [22] The accuracy of panoramic radiography as a screening of bone mineral density in women: a systematic review
    Kinalski, Mateus Azevedo
    Boscato, Noeli
    Damian, Melissa Feres
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (02)
  • [23] EVALUATION OF PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY MEASURES FOR IDENTIFYING REDUCED BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN ELDERLY
    Nalcaci, Rana
    Baran, Ilgi
    Orkun, Sevim
    Tosun, Aliye
    Misirlioglu, Melda
    TURK GERIATRI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS, 2010, 13 (01): : 18 - 25
  • [24] EVALUATION OF PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY MEASURES FOR IDENTIFYING REDUCED BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN ELDERLY
    Nalcaci, Rana
    Baran, Ilgi
    Orkun, Sevim
    Tosun, Aliye
    Misirlioglu, Melda
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, 2010, 13 (01): : 18 - 25
  • [25] A Panoramic X-ray as a Supportive Diagnostic Tool for the Screening of Osteoporosis in Patients with Hemophilia A and B
    Czajkowska, Sylwia
    Rupa-Matysek, Joanna
    Nijakowski, Kacper
    Gil, Lidia
    Surdacka, Anna
    Kulczyk, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (21)
  • [26] BMD-GAN: Bone Mineral Density Estimation Using X-Ray Image Decomposition into Projections of Bone-Segmented Quantitative Computed Tomography Using Hierarchical Learning
    Gu, Yi
    Otake, Yoshito
    Uemura, Keisuke
    Soufi, Mazen
    Takao, Masaki
    Sugano, Nobuhiko
    Sato, Yoshinobu
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION, MICCAI 2022, PT VI, 2022, 13436 : 644 - 654
  • [27] Trabecular bone volume and bone mineral density in the mandible
    Lindh, C
    Petersson, A
    Klinge, B
    Nilsson, M
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 26 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [28] Minimum detectable limits of measuring bone mineral density using an energy dispersive X-ray diffraction system
    Allday, AW
    Farquharson, MJ
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2001, 61 (3-6) : 589 - 592
  • [29] Bone mineral density assessment using the EOS® low-dose X-ray device: a feasibility study
    Sapin, E.
    Briot, K.
    Kolta, S.
    Gravel, P.
    Skalli, W.
    Roux, C.
    Mitton, D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2008, 222 (H8) : 1263 - 1271
  • [30] Assessment of bone mineral density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses
    Lin, Hsiang-Yu
    Shih, Shou-Chuan
    Chuang, Chih-Kuang
    Chen, Ming-Ren
    Niu, Dau-Ming
    Lin, Shuan-Pei
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2013, 8