Last generation fluted modular titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty: a narrative review of mid- and long-term outcomes

被引:0
作者
Randelli, Filippo [1 ]
Fioruzzi, Alberto [1 ]
Barion, Giacomo [2 ]
Volpe, Giulia [2 ]
Vigano, Martino [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Gaetano Pini CTO Orthopaed Inst, Hip Dept, Via Festa Perdono 7, I-20122 Milan, MI, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Orthoped & Tramatol, Milan, MI, Italy
来源
ANNALS OF JOINT | 2024年 / 9卷
关键词
Modular stem; revision stem; revision total hip arthroplasty (revision THA); stem survival; stem fracture; FEMORAL BONE LOSS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; REPLACEMENT; CLASSIFICATIONS; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.21037/aoj-23-35
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: Tapered fluted titanium stems (TFTS), were introduced to overcome proximal femur bone defects. They obtain stable fixation even in catastrophic proximal bone loss. Modular ones have the advantage to adjust length, rotation, off-set independently from the distal module. Shortterm publications have been showing favorable outcomes burdened by an unacceptably high rate of stem failure. Still, there is a paucity of mid- and long-term reports. This narrative review aims at analyzing recent literature on modular TFTS with at least 5 years of minimum follow-up to gain a better understanding of implant survival, performance, and complications. Methods: A search of the PubMed database was performed with selected key terms. Results were screened after the application of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data were subsequently evaluated to obtain an up-to-date overview of the results and complications of TFTS. Key Content and Findings: Modular TFTS showed a consistent increase in patient reported outcomes that persists at 10 years and above. Femoral fractures were the most common intraoperative complication. Despite modularity, dislocation still occurs at a variable rate (1.2-12%). With revision for any cause as an endpoint, overall survival approaches 83% after 10 years of follow-up. If femoral revision only is evaluated, excellent survival rates (>95%) have been published. Stem subsidence over 5 mm was reported in less than 5% of patients, only 1 requiring femoral revision. The mean incidence of stem mechanical failure was 3.39%, although most breakages occurred in stems eventually retired from the market. Conclusions: Satisfactory survival rates were observed, with an acceptable rate of complications. Stem mechanical failure, excluding those stems eventually retired from the market, remains a marginal event. Therefore, the use of modular TFTS in revision surgery is safe and effective even in the long term.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Clinical, radiographic, and survivorship analysis of a modular fluted tapered stem in revision hip arthroplasty
    Ferraz Picado, Celso Herminio
    Savarese, Aniello
    Cardamoni, Vitor dos Santos
    Sugo, Arthur Tomotaka
    Garcia, Flavio Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 28 (01)
  • [12] Reproducible fixation with a tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty at 8-15 years follow-up
    Rodriguez, Jose A.
    Deshmukh, Ajit J.
    Robinson, Jonathan
    Cornell, Charles N.
    Rasquinha, Vijay J.
    Ranawat, Amar S.
    Ranawat, Chitranjan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (09) : 214 - 218
  • [13] Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review
    Koutalos, Antonios A.
    Varitimidis, Sokratis
    Malizos, Konstantinos N.
    Karachalios, Theofilos
    [J]. HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 32 (04) : 475 - 487
  • [14] Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular, Cementless Femoral Stem: Long-Term Follow-Up
    Valtanen, Rosa S.
    Hwang, Katherine L.
    Amanatullah, Derek F.
    Huddleston, James I.
    Maloney, William J.
    Goodman, Stuart B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (05) : 903 - 908
  • [15] Mid-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Long Cementless Monobloc Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Chatelet, Jean-Christophe
    Ait-Si-Selmi, Tarik
    Machenaud, Alain
    Ramos-Pascual, Sonia
    Fessy, Michel-Henri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (01) : 261 - 267
  • [16] What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Huang, Yong
    Zhou, Yixin
    Shao, Hongyi
    Gu, Jianming
    Tang, Hao
    Tang, Qiheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (10) : 3108 - 3113
  • [17] The Long-Term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Cemented β-Titanium Stem
    Takaoka, Yusuke
    Goto, Koji
    Kuroda, Yutaka
    Kawai, Toshiyuki
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (08) : 2167 - 2172
  • [18] Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty
    Zhang, Heng
    Zhou, Jiansheng
    Liu, Yang
    Guan, Jianzhong
    Ding, Hai
    Wang, Zhiyan
    Dong, Qirong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [19] Indications, complications and outcomes of modular stems in total hip revision arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature
    Cottino, Umberto
    Pirato, Francesco
    Battaglia, Domenico L.
    Dettoni, Federico
    Bruzzone, Matteo
    Rossi, Roberto
    [J]. MINERVA ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 75 (03): : 243 - 254
  • [20] Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty
    Hoberg, Maik
    Konrads, Christian
    Engelien, Jana
    Oschmann, Dorothee
    Holder, Michael
    Walcher, Matthias
    Rudert, Maximilian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (09) : 1709 - 1713