Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in patients with endothelial dystrophy without edema

被引:0
作者
Shemer, Asaf [1 ,2 ]
Fradkin, Maayan [1 ,2 ]
Dubinsky-Pertzov, Biana [1 ,2 ]
Reitblat, Olga [2 ,3 ]
Simaan, Francis [1 ,2 ]
Sella, Ruti [2 ,3 ]
Pras, Eran [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Einan-Lifshitz, Adi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shamir Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[4] Shamir Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Matlows Ophthalmo Genet Lab, Zerifin, Israel
关键词
REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; CATARACT-SURGERY; KERATOPLASTY;
D O I
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001578
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of several intraocular lens (IOL) formulas for patients with endothelial dystrophy (ED) without edema treated with cataract surgery alone. Setting: 1 academic, tertiary referral center. Design: Comparative retrospective cohort study. Methods: The predicted refractive results of patients with ED who underwent cataract surgery were assessed and compared with a matched control group. The accuracy of 5 different IOL formulas, Haigis, Holladay 1, Barrett Universal II (BUII), SRK/T, and Kane, was evaluated and compared between the groups. The SDs of the prediction error (PE) of all formulas were compared. Results:221 eyes were included in this study. 50 (23%) eyes of patients with ED and 171 (77%) control eyes. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in clinical and demographical characteristics (P > .05). The postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.37 diopters (D) in the ED group and -0.30 D in the control group (P = .8). Overall, both groups had a comparable SD of the PE and absolute PE in all formulas (P > .05). In the ED group, absolute PE was 0.34 D for Haigis, 0.32 D for Holladay 1, 0.32 D for BUII, 0.38 D for SRK/T, and 0.32 D for Kane formulas. No statistically significant difference between formulas was found. Conclusions: The prediction accuracy of IOL power calculation in patients with ED was found comparable both between formulas and in comparison with healthy controls. This suggests that in patients with guttate without edema, the IOL power calculations are as effective and accurate as in healthy eyes.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Intraocular lens power calculation using standard formulas and ray tracing after DMEK in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy [J].
Alnawaiseh, Maged ;
Zumhagen, Lars ;
Rosentreter, Andre ;
Eter, Nicole .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 17
[2]  
Amin S, 2013, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V54
[3]  
[Anonymous], Terms of Use Kane Formula
[5]   A Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in High Myopia [J].
Bernardes, Joao ;
Raimundo, Miguel ;
Lobo, Conceicao ;
Murta, Joaquim Neto .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 37 (03) :207-+
[6]   Diurnal Variation of Visual Acuity and Refraction in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy [J].
Brandi-Dohrn, Franziska ;
Jiang, Jana ;
Grewing, Viviane ;
Fritz, Marianne ;
Zander, Daniel ;
Lieberum, Judith-Lisa ;
Kladny, Anne-Marie ;
Siegel, Helena ;
Bixler, Stephanie ;
Mueller, Claudia ;
Reinhard, Thomas ;
Wacker, Katrin .
CORNEA, 2024, 43 (01) :83-87
[7]   Visual and refractive outcomes of laser cataract surgery [J].
Chen, Heather ;
Hyatt, Thomas ;
Afshari, Natalie .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 25 (01) :49-53
[8]   Advancements in intraocular lens power calculation formulas [J].
Chung, Jinkwon ;
Bu, Jennifer J. ;
Afshari, Natalie A. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01) :35-40
[9]   Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Fuchs' Corneal Dystrophy [J].
del Buey, Maria A. ;
Cristobal, Jose A. ;
Ascaso, Francisco J. ;
Lavilla, Laura ;
Lanchares, Elena .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (07) :3199-3202
[10]   Optimizing intraocular lens power calculation using adjusted conventional keratometry for cataract surgery combined with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty [J].
Diener, Raphael ;
Treder, Maximilian ;
Lauermann, Jost Lennart ;
Eter, Nicole ;
Alnawaiseh, Maged .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 260 (09) :3087-3093