The Methodological Quality of Studies on Physical Exercise in Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

被引:1
|
作者
Nitz, Alexandrina Cavalcante Rodrigues [1 ,2 ]
Campos, Maria Joao [3 ]
Antunes, Ana Amelia Moraes [4 ]
Freitas, Emilly da Silva [5 ]
Toscano, Chrystiane Vasconcelos Andrade [6 ]
Ferreira, Jose Pedro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Fac Sport Sci & Phys Educ, P-3040248 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Sarah Network Hosp Rehabil, BR-60861634 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[3] Univ Coimbra, Fac Sport Sci & Phys Educ, Res Unit Sport & Phys Act CIDAF, uid dtp 04213 2020, P-3040248 Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Sarah Network Hosp Rehabil, BR-30510000 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Ceara, Physiotherapy Dept, BR-60430160 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[6] Fed Univ Alagoas UFAL, Inst Phys Educ & Sport, Res Project Phys Exercise People Autism Spectrum D, Maceio, AL, Brazil
关键词
physical activity; physical fitness; well-being; neurodevelopment disorder; teenager; rehabilitation; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12202039
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses point to the benefits of physical exercise for adolescents with cerebral palsy, improving physical conditioning, muscle strength, balance, and walking speed. However, given the high number of reviews that include randomized and non-randomized studies, it is increasingly necessary to assess the methodological quality of these reviews. This scoping review investigated the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of physical exercise in adolescents with cerebral palsy to elucidate the methodological limitations of the research and the priorities to be observed in future research. Method: The electronic search used PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Studies published between 2016 and 2023 were selected. The terms used were "cerebral palsy" combined with "physical fitness", "exercise", and "physical activity". Results: A total of 219 original reviews were selected. Of these, 19 reviews were included for data analysis. AMSTAR2 was used to assess the methodological quality of the reviews. Three reviews presented high methodological quality (15.78%) and three had moderate methodological quality (15.78%). The remaining reviews had low or critically low methodological quality, according to AMSTAR2. Interpretation: This study evidenced that systematic reviews have variable methodological quality and that new studies are still needed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of resveratrol: A methodological systematic review
    Lu, Cuncun
    Ke, Lixin
    Zhang, Qiang
    Deng, Xiuxiu
    Shang, Wenru
    Zhao, Xiaoxiao
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Xie, Yanming
    Wang, Zhifei
    PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [2] Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob
    Sultan, Omer Sheriff
    Jayaraman, Jayakumar
    Peters, Ove A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2018, 44 (06) : 903 - 913
  • [3] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF NETWORK META-ANALYSES
    Chambers, J.
    Naci, H.
    Wouters, O.
    Pyo, J.
    Gunjal, S.
    Kennedy, I
    Hoey, M.
    Winn, A.
    Neumann, P. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A31 - A31
  • [4] A Reporting Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Sports Physical Therapy: A Review of Reviews
    Cho, Sung-Hyoun
    Shin, In-Soo
    HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [5] Meningioma systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an assessment of reporting and methodological quality
    George, Alan M.
    Gupta, Shubhi
    Keshwara, Sumirat M.
    Mustafa, Mohammad A.
    Gillespie, Conor S.
    Richardson, George E.
    Steele, Amy C.
    Najafabadi, Amir H. Zamanipoor
    Dirven, Linda
    Marson, Anthony G.
    Islim, Abdurrahman I.
    Jenkinson, Michael D.
    Millward, Christopher P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 36 (06) : 678 - 685
  • [6] AN ASSESSMENT OF THE REPORTING AND METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF MENINGIOMA SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES
    George, A. M.
    Gupta, S.
    Keshwara, S. M.
    Mustafa, M. A.
    Gillespie, C. S.
    Richardson, G. E.
    Steele, A. C.
    Islim, A. I.
    Jenkinson, M. D.
    Millward, C. P.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 : 51 - 52
  • [7] Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology
    Oliveras, Isabel
    Losilla, Josep-Maria
    Vives, Jaume
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 86 : 59 - 70
  • [8] Acupuncture for cancer pain: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Zhang, Yanji
    Zhang, Yingrong
    Liu, Suzhen
    Li, Bocun
    Song, Zhe
    Han, Qi
    Wang, Chang
    Wang, Yiwei
    Yu, Yanxin
    Xia, Hongjie
    Wang, Chun
    Li, Jia
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [9] Idiopathic facial palsy: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Agostini, F.
    Mangone, M.
    Santilli, V.
    Paoloni, M.
    Bernetti, A.
    Saggini, R.
    Paolucci, T.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2020, 34 (04): : 1245 - 1255
  • [10] Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Evaluating Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Tendinopathies: A Scoping Review
    Shahabi, Saeed
    Lankarani, Kamran Bagheri
    Ezati, Rozhin
    Shahali, Shabnam
    JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 2024, 23 (03) : 136 - 151