Automated liver magnetic resonance elastography quality control and liver stiffness measurement using deep learning

被引:0
|
作者
Ozkaya, Efe [1 ,2 ]
Nieves-Vazquez, Heriberto A. [3 ]
Yuce, Murat [1 ,2 ]
Yasokawa, Kazuya [1 ,2 ]
Altinmakas, Emre [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Jun [4 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Biomed Engn & Imaging Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Diagnost Mol & Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnetic resonance elastography; Deep learning; Quality control; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-025-04883-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measures liver stiffness for fibrosis staging, but its utility can be hindered by quality control (QC) challenges and measurement variability. The objective of the study was to fully automate liver MRE QC and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using a deep learning (DL) method.MethodsIn this retrospective, single center, IRB-approved human study, a curated dataset involved 897 MRE magnitude slices from 146 2D MRE scans [1.5 T and 3 T MRI, 2D Gradient Echo (GRE), and 2D Spin Echo-Echo Planar Imaging (SE-EPI)] of 69 patients (37 males, mean age 51.6 years). A SqueezeNet-based binary QC model was trained using combined and individual inputs of MRE magnitude slices and their 2D Fast-Fourier transforms to detect artifacts from patient motion, aliasing, and blurring. Three independent observers labeled MRE magnitude images as 0 (non-diagnostic quality) or 1 (diagnostic quality) to create a reference standard. A 2D U-Net segmentation model was trained on diagnostic slices with liver masks to support LSM. Intersection over union between the predicted segmentation and confidence masks identified measurable areas for LSM on elastograms. Cohen's unweighted Kappa coefficient, mean LSM error (%), and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to compare the DL-assisted approach with the observers' annotations. An efficiency analysis compared the DL-assisted vs manual LSM durations.ResultsThe top QC ensemble model (using MRE magnitude alone) achieved accuracy, precision, and recall of 0.958, 0.982, and 0.886, respectively. The mean LSM error between the DL-assisted approach and the reference standard was 1.9% +/- 4.6%. DL-assisted approach completed LSM for 29 diagnostic slices in under 1 s, compared to 20 min manually.ConclusionAn automated DL-based classification of liver MRE diagnostic quality, liver segmentation, and LSM approach demonstrates a promising high performance, with potential for clinical adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Liver Stiffness Measurements Using Magnetic Resonance Elastography After Eradicating Hepatitis C Virus
    Kumada, Takashi
    Toyoda, Hidenori
    Yasuda, Satoshi
    Sone, Yasuhiro
    Ogawa, Sadanobu
    Takeshima, Kenji
    Tada, Toshifumi
    Ito, Takanori
    Sumida, Yoshio
    Tanaka, Junko
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 12 (04) : E00337
  • [42] Simultaneous multislice rapid magnetic resonance elastography of the liver
    Majeed, Waqas
    Kalra, Prateek
    Kolipaka, Arunark
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2020, 33 (04)
  • [43] Prediction of major complications after hepatectomy using liver stiffness values determined by magnetic resonance elastography
    Sato, N.
    Kenjo, A.
    Kimura, T.
    Okada, R.
    Ishigame, T.
    Kofunato, Y.
    Shimura, T.
    Abe, K.
    Ohira, H.
    Marubashi, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (09) : 1192 - 1199
  • [44] Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Transient Elastography for Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis Assessments in the Liver Transplant Setting
    Ellik, Zeynep Melekoglu
    Idilman, Ilkay S.
    Kartal, Aysun
    Balaban, Yasemin
    Elhan, Atilla H.
    Karcaaltincaba, Musturay
    Ozkan, Hasan
    Idilman, Ramazan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 33 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [45] Magnetic resonance elastography in evaluation of liver fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease
    Demirtas, Duygu
    Unal, Emre
    Idilman, Ilkay S.
    Akcoren, Zuhal
    Goktas, Mehmet Akif
    Boyraz, Meryem Seda
    Karahan, Sevilay
    Orhan, Diclehan
    Haliloglu, Mithat
    Karcaaltincaba, Musturay
    Ozen, Hasan
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [46] Segmental Liver Stiffness Evaluated with Magnetic Resonance Elastography Is Responsive to Endovascular Intervention in Patients with Budd-Chiari Syndrome
    Xu, Peng
    Lyu, Lulu
    Ge, Haitao
    Sami, Muhammad Umair
    Liu, Panpan
    Hu, Chunfeng
    Xu, Kai
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (05) : 773 - 780
  • [47] Magnetic resonance elastography of healthy livers at 3.0 T: Normal liver stiffness measured by SE-EPI and GRE
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Park, Sae-Jin
    Lee, Kyung Bun
    Han, Joon Koo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 107 : 46 - 53
  • [48] In silico evaluation and optimisation of magnetic resonance elastography of the liver
    McGrath, Deirdre M.
    Bradley, Christopher R.
    Francis, Susan T.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (22)
  • [49] Intra-individual comparison of liver stiffness measurements by magnetic resonance elastography and two-dimensional shear-wave elastography in 888 patients
    Ichikawa, Hideo
    Yasuda, Eisuke
    Kumada, Takashi
    Takeshima, Kenji
    Ogawa, Sadanobu
    Tsunekawa, Akikazu
    Goto, Tatsuya
    Nakaya, Koji
    Akita, Tomoyuki
    Tanaka, Junko
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2023, 42 (01) : 65 - 77
  • [50] Magnetic Resonance Elastography in the Liver at 3 Tesla Using a Second Harmonic Approach
    Herzka, D. A.
    Kotys, M. S.
    Sinkus, R.
    Pettigrew, R. I.
    Gharib, A. M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (02) : 284 - 291