共 50 条
Automated liver magnetic resonance elastography quality control and liver stiffness measurement using deep learning
被引:0
|作者:
Ozkaya, Efe
[1
,2
]
Nieves-Vazquez, Heriberto A.
[3
]
Yuce, Murat
[1
,2
]
Yasokawa, Kazuya
[1
,2
]
Altinmakas, Emre
[1
,2
]
Ueda, Jun
[4
]
Taouli, Bachir
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Biomed Engn & Imaging Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Diagnost Mol & Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
来源:
基金:
美国国家科学基金会;
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
Magnetic resonance elastography;
Deep learning;
Quality control;
MR ELASTOGRAPHY;
DISEASE;
D O I:
10.1007/s00261-025-04883-2
中图分类号:
R8 [特种医学];
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100207 ;
1009 ;
摘要:
PurposeMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measures liver stiffness for fibrosis staging, but its utility can be hindered by quality control (QC) challenges and measurement variability. The objective of the study was to fully automate liver MRE QC and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using a deep learning (DL) method.MethodsIn this retrospective, single center, IRB-approved human study, a curated dataset involved 897 MRE magnitude slices from 146 2D MRE scans [1.5 T and 3 T MRI, 2D Gradient Echo (GRE), and 2D Spin Echo-Echo Planar Imaging (SE-EPI)] of 69 patients (37 males, mean age 51.6 years). A SqueezeNet-based binary QC model was trained using combined and individual inputs of MRE magnitude slices and their 2D Fast-Fourier transforms to detect artifacts from patient motion, aliasing, and blurring. Three independent observers labeled MRE magnitude images as 0 (non-diagnostic quality) or 1 (diagnostic quality) to create a reference standard. A 2D U-Net segmentation model was trained on diagnostic slices with liver masks to support LSM. Intersection over union between the predicted segmentation and confidence masks identified measurable areas for LSM on elastograms. Cohen's unweighted Kappa coefficient, mean LSM error (%), and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to compare the DL-assisted approach with the observers' annotations. An efficiency analysis compared the DL-assisted vs manual LSM durations.ResultsThe top QC ensemble model (using MRE magnitude alone) achieved accuracy, precision, and recall of 0.958, 0.982, and 0.886, respectively. The mean LSM error between the DL-assisted approach and the reference standard was 1.9% +/- 4.6%. DL-assisted approach completed LSM for 29 diagnostic slices in under 1 s, compared to 20 min manually.ConclusionAn automated DL-based classification of liver MRE diagnostic quality, liver segmentation, and LSM approach demonstrates a promising high performance, with potential for clinical adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文