Automated liver magnetic resonance elastography quality control and liver stiffness measurement using deep learning

被引:0
|
作者
Ozkaya, Efe [1 ,2 ]
Nieves-Vazquez, Heriberto A. [3 ]
Yuce, Murat [1 ,2 ]
Yasokawa, Kazuya [1 ,2 ]
Altinmakas, Emre [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Jun [4 ]
Taouli, Bachir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Biomed Engn & Imaging Inst, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Diagnost Mol & Intervent Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnetic resonance elastography; Deep learning; Quality control; MR ELASTOGRAPHY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-025-04883-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measures liver stiffness for fibrosis staging, but its utility can be hindered by quality control (QC) challenges and measurement variability. The objective of the study was to fully automate liver MRE QC and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using a deep learning (DL) method.MethodsIn this retrospective, single center, IRB-approved human study, a curated dataset involved 897 MRE magnitude slices from 146 2D MRE scans [1.5 T and 3 T MRI, 2D Gradient Echo (GRE), and 2D Spin Echo-Echo Planar Imaging (SE-EPI)] of 69 patients (37 males, mean age 51.6 years). A SqueezeNet-based binary QC model was trained using combined and individual inputs of MRE magnitude slices and their 2D Fast-Fourier transforms to detect artifacts from patient motion, aliasing, and blurring. Three independent observers labeled MRE magnitude images as 0 (non-diagnostic quality) or 1 (diagnostic quality) to create a reference standard. A 2D U-Net segmentation model was trained on diagnostic slices with liver masks to support LSM. Intersection over union between the predicted segmentation and confidence masks identified measurable areas for LSM on elastograms. Cohen's unweighted Kappa coefficient, mean LSM error (%), and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated to compare the DL-assisted approach with the observers' annotations. An efficiency analysis compared the DL-assisted vs manual LSM durations.ResultsThe top QC ensemble model (using MRE magnitude alone) achieved accuracy, precision, and recall of 0.958, 0.982, and 0.886, respectively. The mean LSM error between the DL-assisted approach and the reference standard was 1.9% +/- 4.6%. DL-assisted approach completed LSM for 29 diagnostic slices in under 1 s, compared to 20 min manually.ConclusionAn automated DL-based classification of liver MRE diagnostic quality, liver segmentation, and LSM approach demonstrates a promising high performance, with potential for clinical adoption.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stable Automated Segmentation of Liver MR Elastography Images for Clinical Stiffness Measurement
    Dzyubak, Bogdan
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Glaser, Kevin
    Yin, Meng
    Talwalkar, Jayant
    Chen, Jun
    Manduca, Armando
    Ehman, Richard L.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS IN MOLECULAR, STRUCTURAL, AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2013, 8672
  • [32] Liver stiffness measured by magnetic resonance elastography as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary case-control study
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Koshiishi, Tsuyota
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Enomoto, Nobuyuki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Araki, Tsutomu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (01) : 156 - 162
  • [33] Risk Prediction Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Elastography-Assessed Liver Stiffness for Predicting Posthepatectomy Liver Failure in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Cho, Hyo Jung
    Ahn, Young Hwan
    Sim, Min Suh
    Eun, Jung Woo
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Kim, Bong Wan
    Huh, Jimi
    Lee, Jei Hee
    Kim, Jai Keun
    Lee, Buil
    Cheong, Jae Youn
    Kim, Bohyun
    GUT AND LIVER, 2022, 16 (02) : 277 - 289
  • [34] Magnetic resonance elastography is as accurate as liver biopsy for liver fibrosis staging
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Nakazawa, Tadao
    Kondo, Tetsuo
    Funayama, Satoshi
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (05) : 1268 - 1275
  • [35] Liver stiffness in magnetic resonance elastography is prognostic for sorafenib-treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Cho, Sung Won
    Cheong, Jae Youn
    Huh, Jimi
    Kim, Jai Keun
    Lee, Jei Hee
    Ahn, Hye Ri
    Cho, Hyo Jung
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 2507 - 2517
  • [36] Temporal changes in liver stiffness after Fontan operation: Results of serial magnetic resonance elastography
    Egbe, Alexander
    Miranda, William R.
    Connolly, Heidi M.
    Khan, Arooj R.
    Al-Otaibi, Mohamad
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    Simonetto, Douglas
    Kamath, Patrick
    Warnes, Carole
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 258 : 299 - 304
  • [37] Advances in Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver
    Li, Jiahui
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur
    Yin, Meng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 28 (03) : 331 - +
  • [38] Predictive Value of Liver Stiffness Measurement by Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Complications after Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liang, Jiaxu
    Qiu, Bo
    Yin, Suo
    Chen, Yong
    Zhang, Sijia
    DIGESTION, 2022, 103 (05) : 357 - 366
  • [39] Spleen stiffness in a healthy pediatric population undergoing liver magnetic resonance elastography
    Serai, Suraj D.
    Glenn, Alexandra
    Trout, Andrew T.
    Lerebo, Wondwossen T.
    Gee, Michael S.
    Khanna, Geetika
    Anupindi, Sudha A.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, : 846 - 856
  • [40] Measurement of stiffness changes in immobilized muscle using magnetic resonance elastography
    Muraki, Takayuki
    Domire, Zachary J.
    McCullough, Matthew B.
    Chen, Qingshan
    An, Kai-Nan
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 25 (05) : 499 - 503