REHABILITATION OF ALVEOLAR BONE THROUGH GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION WITH AUTOGENOUS BONE AND XENOGRAFTS: CBCT STUDY

被引:0
作者
Andreea, Tibeica [1 ]
Catalin, Tibeica Silviu [2 ]
Marcel, Costuleanu [2 ]
Doriana, Agop-Forna [2 ]
Norina, Forna [1 ]
机构
[1] Gr T Popa UMPh Iasi, Fac Dent Implantol Removable Dentures Dent Technol, Iasi, Romania
[2] Gr T Popa UMPh Iasi, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Surg, Iasi, Romania
来源
ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION | 2024年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
alveolar bone; guided tissue regeneration; autogenous bone; xenografts; HORIZONTAL RIDGE AUGMENTATION; GRAFT MATERIALS; BLOCK GRAFTS; OSTEOBLASTS;
D O I
10.6261/RJOR.2024.3.16.11
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to assess the bone gain achieved through guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques using bovine-origin xenograft versus porcine-origin xenograft combined with autogenous bone. Materials and method. The study was conducted on 62 patients (28 male; 34 female), aged between 40-79 years. All patients had partial edentulousness and were candidates for dental implants and the rehabilitation of the resorbed alveolar bone through guided tissue regeneration (GTR) techniques. The characteristics of the study groups are presented in Tables 1.1-1.2. Based on the type of graft material used, the patients were divided into two study groups: bovine-origin xenograft + autogenous bone group (30 patients; 41 implant sites); porcine-origin xenograft + autogenous bone group (32 patients; 50 implant sites). The CBCT examination (Sirona Orthophos XG) was used to measure alveolar bone parameters (preoperatively and six months postoperatively): height, width, and osteodensity of the alveolar bone at the implant sites. Results. The average vertical bone gain (height) was lower in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (5.3076 mm) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (5.8736 mm). The average horizontal bone gain (width) was higher in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (4.4273 mm) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (4.1624 mm). The osteodensity gain was higher in alveolar sites reconstructed with bovine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (279.59 HU) compared to those reconstructed with porcine-origin xenografts combined with autogenous bone (254.24 HU). Conclusions. Postoperative bone gain in vertical and horizontal dimensions, as well as osteodensity, were statistically significant both in the overall group and for each of the investigated categories (sex, age group, location). The use of guided bone regeneration technique using combination of xenografts with autogenous bone are effective in the reconstruction of alveolar bone.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 118
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION AND BONE-GRAFTS IN THE TREATMENT OF FURCATION DEFECTS
    CAFFESSE, RG
    NASJLETI, CE
    PLOTZKE, AE
    ANDERSON, GB
    MORRISON, EC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1993, 64 (11) : 1145 - 1153
  • [22] Periodontal repair in dogs:: A bioabsorbable calcium carbonate coral implant enhances space provision for alveolar bone regeneration in conjunction with guided tissue regeneration
    Wikesjö, UME
    Lim, WH
    Razi, SS
    Sigurdsson, TJ
    Lee, MB
    Tatakis, DN
    Hardwick, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2003, 74 (07) : 957 - 964
  • [23] Retrograde Study Using Radiographic Comparison of Bone Fill Observed after Guided Tissue Regeneration by the Type of Periodontal Bone Defect
    Do, Woo-Seok
    Kim, Yong-Gun
    Suh, Jo-Young
    Kim, Jin-Wook
    Lee, Jae-Mok
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [24] Chitosan-based dental barrier membrane for periodontal guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration: A review
    Bee, Soo-Ling
    Hamid, Zuratul Ain Abdul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2025, 295
  • [25] Guided bone regeneration in osteoporotic conditions following treatment with zoledronic acid
    Mardas, Nikos
    Busetti, Juliano
    de Figueiredo, Jose Antonio Poli
    Mezzomo, Luis Andre
    Scarparo, Roberta Kochenborger
    Donos, Nikolaos
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (03) : 362 - 371
  • [26] Comparison of Bone Resorption Rates after Intraoral Block Bone and Guided Bone Regeneration Augmentation for the Reconstruction of Horizontally Deficient Maxillary Alveolar Ridges
    Gultekin, B. Alper
    Bedeloglu, Elcin
    Kose, T. Emre
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [27] A comparative study of autogenous, allograft and artificial bone substitutes on bone regeneration and immunotoxicity in rat femur defect model
    Zou, Wen
    Li, Xing
    Li, Na
    Guo, Tianwei
    Cai, Yongfu
    Yang, Xiaoqin
    Liang, Jie
    Sun, Yong
    Fan, Yujiang
    [J]. REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [28] DIGITAL SUBTRACTION RADIOGRAPHY IN ASSESSING BONE CHANGES IN PERIODONTAL DEFECTS FOLLOWING GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION
    WENZEL, A
    WARRER, K
    KARRING, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1992, 19 (03) : 208 - 213
  • [29] Advances in autogenous dentin matrix graft as a promising biomaterial for guided bone regeneration in maxillofacial region: A review
    Sun, Honglan
    Yin, Xiaoyunqing
    Yang, Chao
    Kuang, Huifang
    Luo, Wen
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (34) : e39422
  • [30] Guided bone regeneration using bone grafts and collagen membranes
    Wang, HL
    Carroll, WJ
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 32 (07): : 504 - 515