Biotène Versus HydraSmile for Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Study

被引:1
作者
Harley, Randall J. [1 ]
Bowers, Eve [2 ]
Li, Jinhong [3 ]
Bisignani, Mikayla [4 ]
Nilsen, Marci L. [4 ,5 ]
Johnson, Jonas T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Acute & Tertiary Care, 203 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
artificial saliva; head and neck cancer; radiation; xerostomia; BIOTENE; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; TRIALS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/oto2.70038
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the effectiveness of 2 artificial saliva substitutes (Biot & egrave;ne vs HydraSmile) in the symptomatic management of radiation-induced xerostomia.Study DesignRandomized double-blind cross-over study.SettingSingle tertiary care academic institution.MethodsIncluded adult patients >= $<!--<semantics>-->\ge <!--</semantics>-->$6 months postradiotherapy (50-70 gy) for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, or larynx. The primary endpoint was change in overall subjective xerostomia score from baseline, through use of HydraSmile versus Biot & egrave;ne. Scores were derived from a 100-point visual analog scale, with higher scores indicating better symptomatic control. Analysis of covariance model was used to regress the difference in after-treatment measurement between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne, with respect to baseline differences.ResultsA total of 91 participants were included (mean age 63.0 years [SD 9.7]; 85.7% male; 97.8% White). Change in overall xerostomia score with respect to baseline was not significantly different between HydraSmile and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.35 to 4.81). Compared to water alone, both HydraSmile (mean difference 7.45, 95% CI 3.61-11.29) and Biot & egrave;ne (mean difference 7.24, 95% CI 3.06-11.43) significantly improved overall xerostomia score. Forty (44%) patients reported a preference for Biot & egrave;ne, 46 (50.5%) preferred HydraSmile, and 5 (5.5%) had no preference. Patients who preferred Biot & egrave;ne did not significantly benefit from HydraSmile, whereas those who preferred HydraSmile did not significantly benefit from Biot & egrave;ne.ConclusionBiot & egrave;ne and HydraSmile significantly improved oral dryness among patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. While neither product demonstrated treatment superiority, individual product preference was predictive of greatest treatment benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of AqualiefTM Mucoadhesive Tablets in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Developed Radiation-Induced Xerostomia
    Iacovelli, Nicola Alessandro
    Ingargiola, Rossana
    Facchinetti, Nadia
    Franceschini, Marzia
    Romanello, Domenico Attilio
    Bossi, Paolo
    Bergamini, Cristiana
    Alfieri, Salvatore
    Cavalieri, Stefano
    Baron, Giovanna
    Aldini, Giancarlo
    Locati, Laura
    Orlandi, Ester
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [2] Randomized double-blind trial of amifostine versus placebo for radiation-induced xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer
    Lee, Maverick G. L.
    Freeman, Amanda R.
    Roos, Daniel E.
    Milner, Alvin D.
    Borg, Martin F.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (01) : 142 - 150
  • [3] Impact of Oral Intake of Glucosylceramide Extracted from Pineapple on Xerostomia: A Double-Blind Randomized Cross-Over Trial
    Murakami, Mamoru
    Nishi, Yasuhiro
    Harada, Kae
    Masuzaki, Tomohiro
    Minemoto, Yoko
    Yanagisawa, Takahiro
    Shimizu, Takaharu
    Tsuboi, Akito
    Hamada, Taizo
    Nishimura, Masahiro
    NUTRIENTS, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [4] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of concomitant pilocarpine with head and neck irradiation for prevention of radiation-induced xerostomia
    Haddad, P
    Karimi, M
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 64 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [5] The Effect of 1% Pilocarpine Mouthwash on Salivary Flow Rate in Patients with Radiation-Induced Xerostomia: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Motahari, Paria
    Pakdel, Farzaneh
    Hashemzadeh, Nastaran
    Heydari, Farid
    Zamiri, Reza Eghdam
    Katebi, Katayoun
    MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 15 (02) : 108 - 116
  • [6] SUCRALFATE MOUTH WASHING IN THE PREVENTION OF RADIATION-INDUCED MUCOSITIS - A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY
    MAKKONEN, TA
    BOSTROM, P
    VILJA, P
    JOENSUU, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 30 (01): : 177 - 182
  • [7] Efficacy of GUMA® Hydral versus BiotSneA® Oralbalance mouthwashes plus gels on symptoms of medication-induced xerostomia: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study
    Barbe, Anna Greta
    Schmidt-Park, Yasmin
    Hamacher, Stefanie
    Derman, Sonja Henny Maria
    Noack, Michael Johannes
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (01) : 169 - 180
  • [8] PHASE III RANDOMIZED STUDY: ORAL PILOCARPINE VERSUS SUBMANDIBULAR SALIVARY GLAND TRANSFER PROTOCOL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF RADIATION-INDUCED XEROSTOMIA
    Jha, Naresh
    Seikaly, Hadi
    Harris, Jeffrey
    Williams, David
    Sultanem, Khalil
    Hier, Michael
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Black, Martin
    Butler, James
    Sutherland, Donna
    Kerr, Paul
    Barnaby, Pam
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2009, 31 (02): : 234 - 243
  • [9] Trehalose versus carboxymethylcellulose oral spray for relieving radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Piboonratanakit, Pornpan
    Ferreira, Joao N.
    Pravinvongvuthi, Kulpriya
    Maison, Khwanchanok
    Urkasemsin, Ganokon
    Boonroung, Thirayu
    Prayongrat, Anussara
    Lertbutsayanukul, Chawalit
    Sucharitakul, Jeerus
    Vacharaksa, Anjalee
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [10] Topical Phenytoin Versus Placebo in the Management of Acute Radiation-Induced Dermatitis in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zabihi, Ebrahim
    Zamani, Mobina
    Vallard, Alexis
    Magne, Nicolas
    Moslemi, Dariush
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (01)