Return on investments in social determinants of health interventions: what is the evidence?

被引:1
作者
Nikpay, Sayeh [1 ]
Zhang, Zhanji [2 ]
Karaca-Mandic, Pinar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minnesota Populat Ctr, Dept Appl Econ, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Business Advancement Ctr Hlth BACH, Carlson Sch Management, Dept Finance, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR | 2024年 / 2卷 / 09期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
return on investment; social determinants of health;
D O I
10.1093/haschl/qxae114
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There has been an increasing recognition of the importance and the value of addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve population health outcomes, manage health care costs, and reduce health inequities. Despite the strong interest in investing in SDOH initiatives by various stakeholders, the literature on the return from such investments is scarce. The differences in study populations and methodologies, and the lack of data on SDOH intervention outcomes and/or costs, make it challenging to quantify and generalize outcomes for decision-making. We reviewed the literature on SDOH interventions focused on food and housing insecurity, and developed a methodology for estimating a key outcome: the return on investment (ROI), defined as the net returns from an intervention divided by its costs. The ROI estimates we report can be used by stakeholders to prioritize among alternative SDOH interventions for fundraising, investing, and implementing purposes. The average ROI for food-insecurity programs was 85% (ranging from 1% to 287%; except for 1 study's ROI, -31%) and for housing-insecurity programs was 50% (ranging from 5% to 224%; except for 1 ROI, -38%). In addition, these estimates can serve as key inputs for designing and employing innovative financing and policy solutions to increase the use of these interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 2023, The Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS-HC) panel design and data collection process
  • [2] American Hospital Association (AHA), 2024, Social determinants of health
  • [3] American Medical Association (AMA), 2024, Social determinants of health
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, Social determinants of health
  • [5] Artiga S., 2018, HLTH CARE ROLE SOCIA
  • [6] Blewett Lynn A, 2023, IPUMS, DOI 10.18128/D071.V2.3
  • [7] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2023, Why Is Addressing Social Determinants of Health Important for CDC and Public Health?
  • [8] Czeisler MÉ, 2020, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V69, P1250, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4
  • [9] DeSalvo KB., 2019, Medicaid. Health Affairs Blog blog on the Internet, DOI [10.1377/forefront.20190701.764626/full, DOI 10.1377/FOREFRONT.20190701.764626/FULL]
  • [10] A Social-Return-On-Investment Analysis Of Bon Secours Hospital's 'Housing For Health' Affordable Housing Program
    Drabo, Emmanuel Fulgence
    Eckel, Grace
    Ross, Samuel L.
    Brozic, Michael
    Carlton, Chanie G.
    Warren, Tatiana Y.
    Kleb, George
    Laird, Aurelia
    Porter, Keshia M. Pollack
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2021, 40 (03) : 513 - 520