Economic Evaluation of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec from Italian NHS Perspective

被引:2
作者
Torre, Enrico [1 ]
Di Matteo, Sergio [2 ]
Bruno, Giacomo Matteo [3 ]
Martinotti, Chiara [2 ]
Bottaro, Luigi Carlo [4 ]
Colombo, Giorgio Lorenzo [3 ]
机构
[1] Endocrinol Diabetol & Metab Dis Unit ASL3, Genoa, Italy
[2] SAVE Studi Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Ctr Res, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Pavia, Dept Drug Sci, Pavia, Italy
[4] ASL3, Gen Direct, Genoa, Italy
关键词
icodec; once-weekly basal insulin; diabetes; differential cost analysis; cost-utility analysis; adherence improvement; TYPE-2; DIABETES-MELLITUS; HEALTH-CARE COSTS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; TREATMENT INITIATION; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; PERSISTENCE; NONADHERENCE; DEGLUDEC; THERAPY;
D O I
10.2147/CEOR.S475461
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Icodec, once-weekly basal insulin, aims to simplify therapy management by reducing injection frequency for diabetic patients. The efficacy and safety of icodec were evaluated in the ONWARDS clinical development program. This study evaluates icodec economic and quality of life impact from the Italian National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective. Materials and Methods: A pharmacoeconomic study was developed to assess the once-weekly insulin icodec value, highlighting its potential to decrease needle use while improving adherence and quality of life. In the base case, a differential cost and cost-utility analysis over one year compared to once-daily insulin degludec were developed. Based on the comparison with degludec, a scenario analysis was planned between icodec and the mix of basal insulins available on the market. Economic evaluations included drug and administration costs, needles, and impact on adherence. The cost-utility analysis measured the utility associated with the weekly injection compared to the daily ones, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured as Delta<euro>/Delta QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Years). To assess the robustness of the results, a deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were carried out. Results: At an annual cost 25% higher than degludec, considering the economic benefits generated by the needle use reduction (-<euro>51.10) and adherence improvement (-<euro>54.85), once-weekly icodec grants no incremental cost and even potential savings per patient. Furthermore, icodec reported a utility advantage (0.023). It achieved a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to degludec. The comparison with the mix of basal insulins also reported a cost-effectiveness profile. Sensitivity tests conducted confirmed the robustness of the findings, highlighting the key drivers of the analysis. Conclusion: Icodec represents a new therapeutic option to simplify basal insulin treatment. It also improves the patient's management and his quality of life, without increasing the economic burden for the Italian NHS, while guaranteeing an excellent cost-effectiveness profile.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 811
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. AIFA, 2006, Determinazione 27 settembre 2006. Manovra per il governo della spesa farmaceutica convenzionata e non convenzionata. (GU Serie Generale n.227 del 29-09-2006). GU Serie Generale n.227 del 29-09-2006
[2]  
Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. AIFA, Determinazione 3 luglio 2006. Elenco dei medicinali di classe a) rimborsabili dal Servizio sanitario nazionale (SSN) ai sensi dell'articolo 48, comma 5, lettera c), del decreto-legge 30 settembre 2003, 269, convertito, con modificazioni, nella legge 24 novembre 2006, 326. Prontuario farmaceutico nazionale 2006). (GU Serie Generale n.156 del 07-07-2006-Suppl. Ordinario n. 161. Prontuario farmaceutico nazionale 2006). (GU Serie Generale n.156 del 07-07-2006-Sup
[3]   Assessment of Adherence to Insulin Injections among Diabetic Patients on Basal-Bolus Regimen in Primary and Secondary Healthcare Centers in Al-Jouf Region of Saudi Arabia; A Descriptive Analysis [J].
Alsaidan, Aseel Awad ;
Alsaidan, Omar Awad ;
Mallhi, Tauqeer Hussain ;
Khan, Yusra Habib ;
Alzarea, Abdulaziz Ibrahim ;
Alanazi, Abdullah Salah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (10)
[4]  
AMD, Annali AMD 2022Diabete T2
[5]   Clinical inertia is the enemy of therapeutic success in the management of diabetes and its complications: a narrative literature review [J].
Andreozzi, F. ;
Candido, R. ;
Corrao, S. ;
Fornengo, R. ;
Giancaterini, A. ;
Ponzani, P. ;
Ponziani, M. C. ;
Tuccinardi, F. ;
Mannino, D. .
DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2020, 12 (01)
[6]  
[Anonymous], Resident population on 1st January. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica
[7]  
Antonazzo IC, 2023, VALUE HEALTH, V26, pS353
[8]   Reconsidering the role of glycaemic control in cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: A 21st century assessment [J].
Aroda, Vanita R. ;
Eckel, Robert H. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2022, 24 (12) :2297-2308
[9]   A Review of Diabetes Treatment Adherence and the Association with Clinical and Economic Outcomes [J].
Asche, Carl ;
LaFleur, Joanne ;
Conner, Christopher .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (01) :74-109
[10]   Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5) A Randomized Trial [J].
Bajaj, Harpreet S. ;
Aberle, Jens ;
Davies, Melanie ;
Donatsky, Anders Meller ;
Frederiksen, Marie ;
Yavuz, Dilek G. ;
Gowda, Amoolya ;
Lingvay, Ildiko ;
Bode, Bruce .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 176 (11) :1476-1485