Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission: rapid review of evidence from Italy, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China

被引:1
作者
Faherty, Laura J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Lima, Pedro Nascimento [4 ]
Lim, Jing Zhi [5 ]
Roberts, Derek [5 ]
Karr, Sarah [5 ]
Lawson, Emily [5 ]
Willis, Henry H. [6 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Boston, MA 02116 USA
[2] Maine Med Ctr, Portland, ME 04102 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] RAND Corp, Arlington, VA USA
[5] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[6] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
COVID-19; non-pharmaceutical interventions; effective reproduction number; contact rate; disease transmission; infectious disease modeling; CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019; IMPACT; EPIDEMIC; CONTAINMENT; INFLUENZA; DYNAMICS; LOCKDOWN; POLICIES; DEATHS; SPREAD;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1426992
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Prior to the development of COVID-19 vaccines, policymakers instituted various non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to limit transmission. Prior studies have attempted to examine the extent to which these NPIs achieved their goals of containment, suppression, or mitigation of disease transmission. Existing evidence syntheses have found that numerous factors limit comparability across studies, and the evidence on NPI effectiveness during COVID-19 pandemic remains sparse and inconsistent. This study documents the magnitude and variation in NPI effectiveness in reducing COVID-19 transmission (i.e., reduction in effective reproduction rate [Reff] and daily contact rate) in Italy, the United States, the United Kingdom, and China. Methods: Our rapid review and narrative synthesis of existing research identified 126 studies meeting our screening criteria. We selected four contexts with >5 articles to facilitate a meaningful synthesis. This step yielded an analytic sample of 61 articles that used data from China, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Results: We found wide variation and substantial uncertainty around the effectiveness of NPIs at reducing disease transmission. Studies of a single intervention or NPIs that are the least stringent had estimated Reff reductions in the 10-50% range; those that examined so-called "lockdowns" were associated with greater Reff reductions that ranged from 40 to 90%, with many in the 70-80% range. While many studies reported on multiple NPIs, only six of the 61 studies explicitly used the framing of "stringency" or "mild versus strict" or "tiers" of NPIs, concepts that are highly relevant for decisionmakers. Conclusion: Existing evidence suggests that NPIs reduce COVID-19 transmission by 40 to 90 percent. This paper documents the extent of the variation in NPI effectiveness estimates and highlights challenges presented by a lack of standardization in modeling approaches. Further research on NPI effectiveness at different stringency levels is needed to inform policy responses to future pandemics.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Impact of community masking on COVID-19: A cluster-randomized trial in Bangladesh
    Abaluck, Jason
    Kwong, Laura H.
    Styczynski, Ashley
    Haque, Ashraful
    Kabir, Md Alamgir
    Bates-Jefferys, Ellen
    Crawford, Emily
    Benjamin-Chung, Jade
    Raihan, Shabib
    Rahman, Shadman
    Benhachmi, Salim
    Bintee, Neeti Zaman
    Winch, Peter J.
    Hossain, Maqsud
    Reza, Hasan Mahmud
    Jaber, Abdullah All
    Momen, Shawkee Gulshan
    Rahman, Aura
    Banti, Faika Laz
    Huq, Tahrima Saiha
    Luby, Stephen P.
    Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2022, 375 (6577) : 160 - +
  • [2] Modelling lockdown measures in epidemic outbreaks using selective socio-economic containment with uncertainty
    Albi, Giacomo
    Pareschi, Lorenzo
    Zanella, Mattia
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 18 (06) : 7161 - 7190
  • [3] Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19
    Aleta, Alberto
    Martin-Corral, David
    Pastore y Piontti, Ana
    Ajelli, Marco
    Litvinova, Maria
    Chinazzi, Matteo
    Dean, Natalie E.
    Halloran, M. Elizabeth
    Longini, Ira M., Jr.
    Merler, Stefano
    Pentland, Alex
    Vespignani, Alessandro
    Moro, Esteban
    Moreno, Yamir
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 4 (09) : 964 - +
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Coronavirus: Italy extends emergency measures nationwide
  • [5] Designing social distancing policies for the COVID-19 pandemic: A probabilistic model predictive control approach
    Armaou, Antonios
    Katch, Bryce
    Russo, Lucia
    Siettos, Constantinos
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 19 (09) : 8804 - 8832
  • [6] The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review
    Banholzer, Nicolas
    Lison, Adrian
    Ozcelik, Dennis
    Stadler, Tanja
    Feuerriegel, Stefan
    Vach, Werner
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 37 (10) : 1003 - 1024
  • [7] Estimating and explaining cross-country variation in the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19
    Banholzer, Nicolas
    Feuerriegel, Stefan
    Vach, Werner
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [8] Effectiveness of face masks for reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review
    Boulos, Leah
    Curran, Janet A.
    Gallant, Allyson
    Wong, Helen
    Johnson, Catherine
    Delahunty-Pike, Alannah
    Saxinger, Lynora
    Chu, Derek
    Comeau, Jeannette
    Flynn, Trudy
    Clegg, Julie
    Dye, Christopher
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2023, 381 (2257):
  • [9] Brook CE, 2021, EPIDEMICS-NETH, V37, DOI [10.1101/2020.11.12.20230870, 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100527]
  • [10] Mapping social distancing measures to the reproduction number for COVID-19
    Brooks-Pollock, Ellen
    Read, Jonathan M.
    McLean, Angela R.
    Keeling, Matt J.
    Danon, Leon
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 376 (1829)