Health economic evaluation of structured education programs for patients with diabetes: a systematic review

被引:1
作者
Ye, Caihua [1 ]
Zhou, Qiwei [1 ]
Yang, Wenfei [1 ]
Tao, Libo [2 ]
Jiang, Xinjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Med Univ, Int Nursing Sch, Haikou, Hainan, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Hlth Policy & Technol Evaluat, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
health economic evaluation; diabetes; structured education; cost-effectiveness analysis; systematic review; SELF-MANAGEMENT EDUCATION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CARE MANAGEMENT; LOW-INCOME; INTERVENTION; PEOPLE; BURDEN; COMPLICATIONS; STANDARDS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2024.1467178
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes structured education programs have been demonstrated to effectively improve glycemic control and self-management behaviors. However, evidence on the health economic evaluation of these programs is limited. Objectives: To systematically review the health economic evaluation of structured education programs for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: The English databases PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE, OVID, COCHRANE LIBRARY, EMBASE, and EBSCO, along with the Chinese databases CNKI, WANFANG, VIP, and SINOMED, were searched from their inception to September 2024. The quality of the literature was assessed using the CHEERS 2022 checklist. A descriptive analysis was performed on the studies included in the review, with all currencies converted to international dollars. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than one times the per capita GDP was considered highly cost-effective, while a ratio between one and three times the per capita GDP was considered cost-effective. Results: A total of 28 studies from upper-middle-income and high-income countries were included. The average quality score of the included studies was 18.6, indicating a moderate level of reporting quality. Among these, eleven studies demonstrated that diabetes structured education programs were highly cost-effective and twelve were found to be cost-effective. In contrast, three studies were deemed not cost-effective, and two studies provided uncertain results. The ranges of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for short-term, medium-term, and long-term studies were - 520.60 to 65,167.00 dollars, -24,952.22 to 14,465.00 dollars, and -874.00 to 236,991.67 dollars, respectively. Conclusion: This study confirms the cost-effectiveness of structured education programs for diabetes and highlights their importance for patients with type 2 diabetes who have HbA1c levels exceeding 7% and are receiving non-insulin therapy. Additionally, the potential advantages of incorporating telecommunication technologies into structured diabetes education were emphasized. These findings offer valuable insights and guidance for decision-making in diabetes management and clinical practice, contributing to the optimization of medical resource allocation and the improvement of health status and quality of life for patients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 73 条
[51]   Effects of a structured education program on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes [J].
Pacheco, Ana Paula F. ;
van de Sande-Lee, Simone ;
Sandoval, Rita de Cassia B. ;
Batista, Sonia ;
Marques, Jefferson L. B. .
ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2017, 61 (06) :534-541
[52]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906, 10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160]
[53]   Economic burden, financial stress, and cost-related coping among people with uncontrolled diabetes in the U.S [J].
Patel, Minal R. ;
Tolentino, Dante Anthony ;
Smith, Alyssa ;
Heisler, Michele .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 34
[54]   Cost-effectiveness of insulin pumps compared with multiple daily injections both provided with structured education for adults with type 1 diabetes: a health economic analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of Pumps over Structured Education (REPOSE) randomised controlled trial [J].
Pollard, Daniel John ;
Brennan, Alan ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Waugh, Norman ;
Elliott, Jackie ;
Heller, Simon ;
Lee, Ellen ;
Campbell, Michael ;
Basarir, Hasan ;
White, David .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (04)
[55]   The Community Diabetes Education (CoDE) Program Cost-Effectiveness and Health Outcomes [J].
Prezio, Elizabeth A. ;
Pagan, Jose A. ;
Shuval, Kerem ;
Culica, Dan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (06) :771-779
[56]   The cost-effectiveness of different types of educational interventions in type II diabetes mellitus: A systematic review [J].
Rohimi, Wan Nur Liyana Hazwani Wan ;
Tahir, Nurul Ain Mohd .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
[57]   Differential Health Care Use, Diabetes-Related Complications, and Mortality Among Five Unique Classes of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Singapore: A Latent Class Analysis of 71,125 Patients [J].
Seng, Jun Jie Benjamin ;
Kwan, Yu Heng ;
Lee, Vivian Shu Yi ;
Tan, Chuen Seng ;
Zainudin, Sueziani Binte ;
Thumboo, Julian ;
Low, Lian Leng .
DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 (05) :1048-1056
[58]   The Economic Costs of Type 2 Diabetes: A Global Systematic Review [J].
Seuring, Till ;
Archangelidi, Olga ;
Suhrcke, Marc .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2015, 33 (08) :811-831
[59]   Cost-effectiveness of flexible intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with Type 1 diabetes in the UK [J].
Shearer, A ;
Bagust, A ;
Sanderson, D ;
Heller, S ;
Roberts, S .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2004, 21 (05) :460-467
[60]   The WISDOM self-management intervention: A cost-effectiveness analysis to support the transformation of type 2 diabetes care in England [J].
Singh, Surya ;
Price, Hermione ;
Fayers, Kate ;
Leal, Jose ;
Donoghue, Victoria ;
Hempenstall, Julia ;
Lewis, Paul ;
O'Halloran, Paul ;
Tsiachristas, Apostolos .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (10)