MIKROBE: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial of one-stage or two-stage surgery for prosthetic knee infection

被引:0
作者
Terry, Rohini [1 ]
Dean, Sarah [1 ]
Hourigan, Patrick [2 ]
Ben Waterson, Hugh [2 ]
Wylde, Vikki [3 ]
Carpenter, Natalie [1 ]
Whale, Bethany [1 ]
Powell, Roy J. [4 ]
Tarrant, Polly [2 ]
Medina-Lara, Antonieta [1 ]
Alvand, Abtin [5 ]
Toms, Andrew D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, St Lukes Campus,Heavitree Rd, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[2] Royal Devon Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaed Ctr, Exeter Knee Reconstruct Unit, Barrack Rd, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Bristol Biomed Res Ctr, Bristol Med Sch,Musculoskeletal Res Unit, Bristol BS10 5NB, England
[4] NIHR Res Design Serv South West, London, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed NOC, Oxford, England
关键词
Total knee replacement; Prosthetic joint infection; Orthopaedic surgery; Feasibility; Equipoise; Recruitment; Pilot randomised controlled trial; Qualitative interviews; JOINT INFECTIONS; REVISION; ARTHROPLASTY; REPLACEMENT; HIP;
D O I
10.1186/s40814-025-01634-4
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundTotal knee replacement surgery is common, with over 107,000 operations performed in the UK in 2019. After surgery, about 1% of patients develop a deep infection, known as a prosthetic joint infection. Two types of operations, one- or two-stage revision surgery, are routinely performed to treat the infection. Re-infection rates are similar, but there is uncertainty regarding longer-term outcomes for patients. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of conducting a future randomised controlled trial that will compare clinical and cost-effectiveness of one-stage versus two-stage revision knee surgery for prosthetic joint infection.MethodsFollowing eligibility screening, consenting patients took part in an audio-recorded consultation with their surgeon and were then randomised on a 1:1 allocation to one-stage or two-stage revision surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures were administered at baseline and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Embedded qualitative work with patient participants and nonparticipants and with surgeons to understand the acceptability of trial processes and involvement was undertaken. Patient and public involvement and engagement activities were conducted throughout the study.ResultsOf 136 patients screened, only 3 were randomised and had surgery as part of the study. Qualitative data were collected from the three participants, as well as from two eligible patients who declined participation and two who withdrew from participation after the initial patient-surgeon consultation. Five surgeons took part in qualitative interviews prior to study end.ConclusionThis study indicated that a larger randomised controlled trial evaluating one-stage versus two-stage revision knee surgery for prosthetic joint infection is not feasible with the current straightforward randomised controlled trial design. Future research needs to consider the most appropriate study design and methodology to address this important research question.Trial registrationNo.: NCT04458961.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Patients' experiences of acquiring a deep surgical site infection: An interview study
    Andersson, Annette Erichsen
    Bergh, Ingrid
    Karlsson, Jon
    Nilsson, Kerstin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2010, 38 (09) : 711 - 717
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: 16th Annual Report
  • [3] The Impact of Information Presentation and Cognitive Dissonance on Processing Systematic Review Summaries: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Bicycle Helmet Legislation
    Bechard, Benoit
    Kimmerle, Joachim
    Lawaree, Justin
    Bedard, Pierre-Oliver
    Straus, Sharon E.
    Ouimet, Mathieu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (10)
  • [4] Beecham J., 2001, MEASURING MENTAL HLT, V2, P200
  • [5] How I do it - Second stage revision total knee arthroplasty
    Bloch, Benjamin
    [J]. KNEE, 2020, 27 (06) : 2007 - 2012
  • [6] Clinical and cost effectiveness of single stage compared with two stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM): pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial
    Blom, Ashley W.
    Lenguerrand, Erik
    Strange, Simon
    Noble, Sian M.
    Beswick, Andrew D.
    Burston, Amanda
    Garfield, Kirsty
    Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
    Harris, Shaun R. S.
    Kunutsor, Setor K.
    Lane, J. Athene
    MacGowan, Alasdair
    Mehendale, Sanchit
    Moore, Andrew J.
    Rolfson, Ola
    Webb, Jason C. J.
    Wilson, Matthew
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 379
  • [7] Cahill J L, 2008, J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), V16, P58
  • [8] EuroQol Research Foundation, 2019, EQ-5D-5L User Guide
  • [9] Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
    Herdman, M.
    Gudex, C.
    Lloyd, A.
    Janssen, M. F.
    Kind, P.
    Parkin, D.
    Bonsel, G.
    Badia, X.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (10) : 1727 - 1736
  • [10] Horwood J, 2016, INT J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V20, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ijotn.2015.05.002