Polar response strategies across modalities: Evidence from German Sign Language (DGS)

被引:0
作者
Loos, Cornelia [1 ]
Steinbach, Markus [2 ]
Repp, Sophie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
关键词
sign language; response particles; polarity; negation; optimality theory; nonmanuals; gesture; German Sign Language (DGS); QUESTIONS; COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1353/lan.2024.a937185
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Research on spoken languages has shown that response particles may indicate the truth of a previous utterance or the polarity of the response. In responses to negative antecedents, the two functions come apart and particles become ambiguous. We present the first quantitative study on response strategies in sign languages by discussing data from a production experiment in German Sign Language ( Deutsche Geb & auml;rdensprache; DGS). The results indicate that DGS does not exploit the potential of simultaneous manual and nonmanual strategies to disambiguate responses. Still, the type of articulator influences the choice of response element. We propose an optimality-theoretic model to account for the role of articulator type, the disambiguation potential, and the morphosyntax of response elements in DGS.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 467
页数:36
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] The paradox of sign language morphology
    Aronoff, M
    Meir, I
    Sandler, W
    [J]. LANGUAGE, 2005, 81 (02) : 301 - 344
  • [2] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [3] Battison R., 1978, LEXICAL BORROWING AM
  • [4] BECKER CLAUDIA, 2016, Handbuch Laut, Gebarde, Buchstabe, P203, DOI [10.1515/9783110295993-012, DOI 10.1515/9783110295993-012]
  • [5] N-words and sentential negation: Evidence from polarity particles and VP ellipsis
    Brasoveanu, Adrian
    Farkas, Donka
    Roelofsen, Floris
    [J]. SEMANTICS & PRAGMATICS, 2013, 6
  • [6] Brentari D., 1998, A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology
  • [7] Production and Comprehension of Prosodic Markers in Sign Language Imperatives
    Brentari, Diane
    Falk, Joshua
    Giannakidou, Anastasia
    Herrmann, Annika
    Volk, Elisabeth
    Steinbach, Markus
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [8] Why do we shake our heads?
    Bross, Fabian
    [J]. GESTURE, 2020, 19 (2-3) : 269 - 298
  • [9] BROSS FABIAN, 2020, The clausal syntax of German Sign Language: A cartographic ap- proach, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.3560718, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.3560718]
  • [10] Burridge Kate., 2002, Australian Journal of Linguistics, V22, P149, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0726860022000013166, 10.1080/0726860022000013166]